- Jan 7, 2003
- 41,835
- 19,852
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Unitarian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The question is:
"It would be great!" doesn't answer the question.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The question is:I think a dream ticket would be Vance/Trump Jr - vs AOC/Bernie
It would be great!
"It would be great!" doesn't answer the question.What do you think he would keep and what do you think he would change should we get a premature change in regime?
I'd take Eric first, personally.Well one’s too young, two are women and the other one is Eric so… yeah Jr gets it by default.
Tiffany seems ok. I like that she’s not really in the spotlight like her other siblings.I'd take Eric first, personally.
The twenty eighth amendment should be a disqualification of all family of former presidents from holding any federal office or cabinet position for 100 years.Tiffany seems ok. I like that she’s not really in the spotlight like her other siblings.
I’d never vote for her to be president but I got nothing against her.
I completely agree, with the exception of the last sentence being unlikely.If i had to predict, I think that Trump's second term honeymoon is about over. Wars, an economic quagmire and this never ending battle on illegals is going to take its toil. The GOP will likely lose the House in 2026 and then it will be pretty much a lame duck Presidency with the exception being putting out one fire (crisis) after another. What an exhausting 4 years. May Jesus return soon.
Closer than ever but perhaps unlikely or even the wrong end times thinking on my part. God blessI completely agree, with the exception of the last sentence being unlikely.
Oh go ahead. The thread is about him.Must...not...post...chubby...Vance...meme...must...remain....strong
-CryptoLutheran
Vance doesn't have what psychologists call the halo effect. He does not have personal magnetism. Obama had the halo effect. Trump seems to have what I can only define as the busted halo effect. He would be easier to defeat but his policies would be as heartless, cruel and immoral.
Well the Trump effect on his base certainly proves that.The halo effect is inherently subjective.
It does seem likely to me that the Vance admin would court Big Tech and their big bucks.Well the Trump effect on his base certainly proves that.
Vance doesn't have it, although tech money can purchase some.
Vance's Senate seat was essentially purchased for him by Peter Thiel, who then leaned on Trump to pick Vance for VP. What does Thiel want a Vance administration to look like?It does seem likely to me that the Vance admin would court Big Tech and their big bucks.
The poll does not suppose that the Vance administration would result from his running; he already ran and is now next in line.Without the looming threat of Trump giving him the "Pence treatment" and sending the MAGA-hounds after him, I think he'd basically be a George W Bush style republican.
Which means, he certainly still wouldn't be popular among Democrats, but would represent a move back toward "normalcy" in the eyes of a lot of folks.
But the question is, would he be able to win without the "Trumpy stuff"?
I think the verdict is out on that one... That would largely depend on who his opponent was.
If the Democrats run an AOC, then a "conventional republican" wins.
If the Democrats run a Gavin Newsom, then a republicans would likely have to embrace some "Trumpy stuff" to beat him.
You are not alone.I think I just threw up in my mouth a bit.
I think the Berniecrat faction of the Democatic party understand that they have to play a longer game than that.Without the looming threat of Trump giving him the "Pence treatment" and sending the MAGA-hounds after him, I think he'd basically be a George W Bush style republican.
Which means, he certainly still wouldn't be popular among Democrats, but would represent a move back toward "normalcy" in the eyes of a lot of folks.
But the question is, would he be able to win without the "Trumpy stuff"?
I think the verdict is out on that one... That would largely depend on who his opponent was.
If the Democrats run an AOC, then a "conventional republican" wins.
That would be his best chance. Don't forget, he is a Roman Catholic which would perhaps encourage him to put a kindlier face on the "Trumpy stuff." Some of Trump's policies are popular even with centrists and would be even more so shorn of their "revenge on the libs" trappings.If the Democrats run a Gavin Newsom, then a republicans would likely have to embrace some "Trumpy stuff" to beat him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?