- Dec 28, 2004
- 1,496
- 69
- 38
- Faith
- Pagan
- Marital Status
- Engaged
- Politics
- US-Others
Should the "dont knock it till you try it" rule/argument work for religion?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't see a working argument there. If you find the truth then surely you should "knock" whatever is false, whether you have "tried it" or not?Antoninus Verus said:Should the "dont knock it till you try it" rule/argument work for religion?
kedaman said:knock it if its false.
By assuming something it doesn't mean that its true. But by finding a contradiction in something, you see that its false.Deus said:Hence the problem,
Everyone assumes they are following the "true" path, while all other paths are false. If you had been brought up muslim you'd be knocking christianity.
Most likely nearly everyone is wrong.
kedaman said:By assuming something it doesn't mean that its true. But by finding a contradiction in something, you see that its false.
I haven't found contradictions in their faith, I just don't care looking for any. Its utterly pointless. I'd rather look for contradictions in my own faith. You point out one and I would agree.Deus said:Well many would say that there are prevalent contradictions in christianity, even though you probably wouldn't agree with them. Just as muslims or jews wouldn't agree that you have found contradictions in their faith. There are many astounding supernatural claims that can't be disproven, but I see no reason to believe in any of them.
That is also true but utterly pointless. Though you can find a set of premises inconsistent, you can never find them to be consistent, let a lone true.morningstar2651 said:Now we're getting logical.
Without proven true premises, you cannot prove your conclusion.
I think religion has nothing to do with knowledge. It has to do with morality.Lifesaver said:Religions provide different beliefs, that is, articles that can be true or false.
What every person ought to do is believe in what is true and discard what is false.
To know that something is false, one needn't have ever believed in it (I know dogs cannot speak, and I have never "tried" this belief).
Therefore, it is perfectly possible for someone to discard a religion they know to be false without having ever believed in it; the saying does not apply.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?