- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nice to see a fable presented in a fablish way.Actually, that development first occurred in the Stegosaurus lineage 150 million years ago, as is obvious by this artistic recreation
Alas, it is a trait that remained restricted to quadrupeds, as is seen in the modern giraffe
A trait retained in the modern Sableye
How diamond eyes function for sight remains a modern mystery, but scientific investigations continue.
As we now know, all therapods entirely consisted of 100 dollar bills in US currency, evolving from the less valuable Canadian currency
Thanks for the writing prompts, dude.
Actually, the way they connect what fossil was related (ancestor) to what..is no secret.
Evolutionary speculation always sounds cool, but is still basically just massive amounts of scientific-sounding guessing against a backdrop of several thousand assumptions.
Genetics is anything but speculative or based on assumption.
Genetics is pretty factual.
Isn't it a little presumptuous to call it the "first bird beak?"
Genetics exist, but what they are telling us is, ultimately, debatable.
As far as what they tell us about the days of Adam and Noah...yes, totally.Genetics exist, but what they are telling us is, ultimately, debatable.
I have no trouble seeing what Hansel and Gretel were said to have done, or seeing what modern nature science says fossils mean. Really. The thing is, they are foolish stories.It indeed isn't a secret. It's rather public and easily accessible information.
Which is exactly why it is kind of bizar that you're having trouble getting it right.
Irony.I have no trouble seeing what Hansel and Gretel were said to have done, or seeing what modern nature science says fossils mean. Really. The thing is, they are foolish stories.
That is why knowing truth from fables comes in handy. Even if science cannot attain that bar, I do ask that they at least know that their religion is all about pumping out fables.Irony.
That is why knowing truth from fables comes in handy. Even if science cannot attain that bar, I do ask that they at least know that their religion is all about pumping out fables.
Guess we would just ask you which was which, and hide the bibles in the closet?You wouldn't know truth from fable if both came up while holding a 50 feet tall sign.
That is why knowing truth from fables comes in handy. Even if science cannot attain that bar, I do ask that they at least know that their religion is all about pumping out fables.
Here's an insane idea: ask about the evidence, instead of simply following the word of someone.Guess we would just ask you which was which, and hide the bibles in the closet?
OK, I'll do that. Give evidence for your religion that you call science. Especially, give evidence for the origin claims/old ages. The pattern of folks from your religion thus far has been to offer belief based circular arguments only.Here's an insane idea: ask about the evidence, instead of simply following the word of someone.
On the other hand, if I look at the evidence of Christ rising from the dead, and His life and direct effects on lives today and through time...you want to say that is not evidence. Let's face it, origin sciences are a jealous and petty little narrow minded religion. A religion that delights in denying facts and evidence as well as making up dark and strange fables.
OK, I'll do that. Give evidence for your religion that you call science. Especially, give evidence for the origin claims/old ages. The pattern of folks from your religion thus far has been to offer belief based circular arguments only.
You 'know' that radioactive decay existed in the far past on earth, and was responsible for all isotopes/ratios we now see...because...you believe it was the same nature in effect always.
You know that time exists the same out in unknown deep space, because....you see light from the stars IN our tie here near earth, and believe it should be the same out there.
Etc.
On the other hand, if I look at the evidence of Christ rising from the dead, and His life and direct effects on lives today and through time...you want to say that is not evidence. Let's face it, origin sciences are a jealous and petty little narrow minded religion. A religion that delights in denying facts and evidence as well as making up dark and strange fables.
OK, I'll do that. Give evidence for your religion that you call science.
Especially, give evidence for the origin claims/old ages.
The pattern of folks from your religion thus far has been to offer belief based circular arguments only.
You 'know' that radioactive decay existed in the far past on earth, and was responsible for all isotopes/ratios we now see...because...you believe it was the same nature in effect always.
Again, why would you assume otherwise?You know that time exists the same out in unknown deep space, because....you see light from the stars IN our tie here near earth, and believe it should be the same out there.
On the other hand, if I look at the evidence of Christ rising from the dead, and His life and direct effects on lives today and through time...you want to say that is not evidence
Let's face it, origin sciences are a jealous and petty little narrow minded religion. A religion that delights in denying facts and evidence as well as making up dark and strange fables.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?