Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Infinity.This reminds me of a turtle analogy.
In your imaginary universe, your cubes extend infinitely. Please explain what those cubes are expanding into.
The part you are missing, and it's not possible to picture it, is that that's all there was. There wasn't a point in something. There wasn't something outside the point. It didn't expand into something.The universal origin story known as the Big Bang postulates that, 13.7 billion years ago, our universe emerged from a singularity — a point of infinite density and gravity
What you said is still there. You said that the universe has a center. I asked for evidence. You said you'd 'read a book'. 'Quote me' You said. So I did.So in other words you can't. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you misunderstood what I said.
On what basis? Some version of 'common sense'? Why not do some actual studying instead. Read about it.Maybe I misunderstood what you said; but I reject the notion that the universe popped up all over the place at once.
Proof?
'Around 13.7 billion years ago, everything in the entire universe was condensed in an infinitesimally small singularity, a point of infinite denseness and heat.'
Why?The alteration of the period is virtually insignificant after it is divided by infinity.
The part you are missing, and it's not possible to picture it, is that that's all there was. There wasn't a point in something. There wasn't something outside the point. It didn't expand into something.
Wait where did you show that science proves creation? All I see is some rambling about thermodynamics and a clear misunderstanding of the Big Bang. How does that "prove" a being created the universe?
Yes, calling it a point doesn't really do it justice - it was all there was and it might even have been infinite in extent...The part you are missing, and it's not possible to picture it, is that that's all there was. There wasn't a point in something. There wasn't something outside the point. It didn't expand into something.
No; all we know is that we can trace it back no further than a very hot dense state beyond which our physics fails - and we know why it fails. But if (when?) we can fix the physics, we'll likely still reach a point earlier than which we can't probe for lack of information.Science might not prove creation, but there was a beginning that is reliably shown.
No; all we know is that we can trace it back ...
There's digital versions of this combined observation and reasoning too.Only on paper.
There's digital versions of this combined observation and reasoning too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?