Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Science doesn't seem at all to want truth nor correction - it keep getting worse and worse, continually, covering up previous errors over and over again.... making up new stories or ideas as it goes, not willing (ever?) to admit the truth nor to repent (turn to Yahweh for His forgiveness or for His help, or to go to Him, to go His Way ) ....Science can't correct itself to the point it catches up to creationism since creationism isn't science.
Science is good at starting fires, then putting them out.Science doesn't seem at all to want truth nor correction - it keep getting worse and worse, continually, covering up previous errors over and over again....
Y2K and Nebraska Man always come to my mind.Sometimes that is the best way to learn.
I'm familiar with the excuses.Y2K was a software development issue. Nebraska Man was a newspaper exaggeration.
How many times, pitabread, have you seen someone tell us:Y2K was a software development issue.
Ya ... he came complete with a binomial: Haroldcookii hesperopithecus ... didn't he?Nebraska Man was a newspaper exaggeration.
I'm familiar with the excuses.
How many times, pitabread, have you seen someone tell us:
"If you don't like science, don't use a computer."
BUT ... let computer scientists "light a fire," and it's a different story, isn't it?
Now it's a "faulty development issue" ... isn't it?
How'd that happen?
Even if it was never published in the newspapers.Same thing happens even today. This is why people should take reporting of science by journalists with a grain of salt.
Even if it was never published in the newspapers.
Even if it was never known to the general public -- only to the Fourth Reich.
Nebraska Man is still a scientific failure, isn't he?
Move on to what? other mistakes?Regardless the original classification was an error, but that's part of the learning process. Science has moved on. Creationists should too.
Move on to what? other mistakes?
Why wasn't Nebraska Man put through the scientific method from [pun] head to toe [/pun]?
How is it he was [pun] walked through peer review [/pun] and came out [pun] without a scratch [/pun]?
The name went on before the quality went in, didn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?