• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Schools that teach creationism in the science class.

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
(*)This assumes there is no staffing emergency in the school district, and there are always emergencies, which is how a lot of biology teachers are named 'Coach'.
in all fairness, i believe it would be a safe bet that the teaching requirements would be relaxed for kindergarten through, maybe, the sixth grade.
-my guess.
even these "teachers" would probably have some type of formal "teaching" course.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The internet may be the downfall of the remaining U.S. creationists. Your neighbor's son has resources that your neighbors did not. It is getting harder and harder for creationists to hide their children from reality.

You really need to distinguish what you mean by creationists. The term is not as black and white as everyone thinks. Creationism is the belief that God created the universe and from there it goes all over the place.
 
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
44
Cambridge
Visit site
✟39,787.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Possibly.

My point is that evolution is generally accepted as the grand unified theory of biology by the biology community. Not teaching evolution in science class is equivalent to ignoring the foundation of modern biology. Teaching something opposed to evolution is bringing a controversy that exists only in the public sphere into the science classroom, since no such controversy exists within biology, itself.

Now, maybe the answer is to remove science from the curriculum when people don't like its conclusions. Personally, I think that's a bad idea, but it's an internally consistent argument. Saying that something other than science should be taught in the science classroom, however, is disingenuous.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

A product of homeschooling? Do you realize that in most cases kids that are taught at home do better at college and more of them go than their public school counterparts? You have a very jaded view of reality when it comes to certain things due to your very apparent bias against religion.
 
Upvote 0

sandybay

Newbie
Apr 8, 2015
184
3
85
✟339.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
The evolution of everything from nothing has no basis in reality. We share 25% of the same DNA as a daffodil, but we don't share ancestry with daffodils.

Nothing comes from nothing, except of course God.

If you go back far enough we share ancestry with everything.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,282
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If you go back far enough we share ancestry with everything.

Luke would disagree.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
 
Upvote 0

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Luke would disagree.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Actually that passage does agree with what he said, just in a different way.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Luke would disagree.

Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

... and god created everything. So yes, in a way, the bible shows all life coming from one original "life". Or nonlife if you don't count god as alive.
 
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
44
Cambridge
Visit site
✟39,787.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You really need to distinguish what you mean by creationists. The term is not as black and white as everyone thinks. Creationism is the belief that God created the universe and from there it goes all over the place.

This is not how "creationist" or "creationism" are typically used. They're generally used to identify a couple of different specific beliefs about that creation process. By what you have just said, I am a creationist. After all, I think that God is the creator of all things. But when people are talking about creationists, they aren't talking about me.

Certainly, you are right that creationism is not one precise thing. But, typically, when the term "creationism" is used, it refers to the acceptance of some significant subset of Henry Morris' ideas about how the world was made, 6000-10,000 years ago, or to a slightly broader category of beliefs that accept an older world, but at least oppose the theory of evolution, as it is understood by scientists.

There has been some push among TE's to relabel ourselves as "evolutionary creationists" for better precision, but I don't think it will catch on because it's not helpful in most contexts. Creationists don't understand it (or don't accept it). Non-Christians don't need the specificity because the theological statement is not especially relevant to discussions of science.
 
Upvote 0

sandybay

Newbie
Apr 8, 2015
184
3
85
✟339.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
The internet may be the downfall of the remaining U.S. creationists. Your neighbor's son has resources that your neighbors did not. It is getting harder and harder for creationists to hide their children from reality.

You really need to distinguish what you mean by creationists. The term is not as black and white as everyone thinks. Creationism is the belief that God created the universe and from there it goes all over the place.

A creationists is someone who believes in a creator.

The Internet will eventually be the downfall of the Christian religion in the US because it gives people access to other opinions, religions only flourish when no other opinions are allowed in.

Finding out what causes thunder and lightning caused people to stop believing in Thor.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship

Pretty sure belief in the Norse gods ended before that point, and most religions die out because of OTHER RELIGIONS becoming dominant and stamping out those who retain the previous beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,282
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
... and god created everything. So yes, in a way, the bible shows all life coming from one original "life". Or nonlife if you don't count god as alive.

According to that passage, who is Adam's common ancestor?
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single

I agree with some of this post, especially "Evolution is a scientific theory and creation is religious doctrine." What I don't understand is why you would think it is OK to teach religious doctrine in a science class.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

English is not my first language.

I dont care how much you say you have studied, I only challange your use of terms and science. Your post is very ignorant of both.

This is not a matter of opinion, this is a matter of you being wrong.
 
Reactions: Ada Lovelace
Upvote 0

South Bound

I stand with Israel.
Jan 3, 2014
4,443
1,034
✟46,159.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

The minimum requirement is that a teacher pass the Praxis II exam. Many, if not most, government school teacher have no additional training in their content area than the two or three general classes they were required to take in college.

The only reason I had a degree in my content area is that both of my parents were college professors and I got free tuition.

I was asked to teach literature, which I love, but had no specific training.

So, in answer to your question, not much.
 
Upvote 0

sandybay

Newbie
Apr 8, 2015
184
3
85
✟339.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status

That does not sound good, do you think most Americans are aware of this?
 
Upvote 0