Well Valentine you and I both know that just unnecessary hyperbole. Trump supporters don't believe he can't do anything wrong? Really?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well Valentine you and I both know that just unnecessary hyperbole. Trump supporters don't believe he can't do anything wrong? Really?I suspected that the cause and effect was reversed among Donald's supporters... he can do no wrong, hence being friendly to Russia is the better (read: only plusgood) choice in the matter.
Not maybe just a groundless accusation?A better question is why are people supporting a President who is clearly violating our election laws, and seeking foreign assistance in our elections.
As stated it appears Adam Schiff is seeking to induce terror into the hearts and minds of Americans as to the threat of Russians attacking the U.S. mainland all because Trump is President or could be re-elected?
To what measure of fear mongering will some, many or a few of these Democratic politicians go to make a case? Does their arguments come across as anyway credible in the slightest? An actual attack on the mainland?
Wasn't there another Democratic politician who did the same in 64 in a commercial aired one time by their campaign but then they pulled it down? Some say it remains one of the most controversial political advertisement ever made. The Daisy Commercial. One wonders why Schiff didn't try to play it in the Senate. Isn't it basically what he was saying to the American people?
My question is juvenile? Why. If the issue is the end result of an election is questioned aren't you still questioning it's integrity? Hillary wanted to claim that for 240 years America has had fair and just elections....and you really would have us believe that's all changed and has collapsed merely because one Donald J Trump has come to office? I'm not saying the Russians have been sweet little innocents but what about the 1950's. The 1960's??? If ever there was a time America was worried about Russia weren't those the days? And yet electoral integrity was secure according to her through all those days. Doesn't seem rather convenience the claims the Democratic politicians now would like to make?That it should be obvious to a child that saying that the election may be under undue influence is different from saying that one will refuse to abide by the election.
Well Valentine you and I both know that just unnecessary hyperbole. Trump supporters don't believe he can't do anything wrong? Really?
Not maybe just a groundless accusation?
My question is juvenile? Why. If the issue is the end result of an election is questioned aren't you still questioning it's integrity? Hillary wanted to claim that for 240 years America has had fair and just elections....and you really would have us believe that's all changed and has collapsed merely because one Donald J Trump has come to office? I'm not saying the Russians have been sweet little innocents but what about the 1950's. The 1960's??? If ever there was a time America was worried about Russia weren't those the days? And yet electoral integrity was secure according to her through all those days. Doesn't seem rather convenience the claims the Democratic politicians now would like to make?
Trump was caught trying to solicit foreign interference in our election.
You don't know there's anything incriminating about testimony not coming forth due to Executive Privilege. You're entitled to your opinion on that but you have no facts to make your claim.There has been tons of evidence supporting the accusation, and absolutely no evidence presented which contradicts it. Additionally, direct evidence, both testimony and documents, have been withheld unilaterally by Trump.
Nope. Sorry but that's merely your accusation. Your saying that doesn't mean it's so.
It’s based on the phone call where Trump flat out asks for a favor. You insisting there’s nothing wrong with that doesn’t make it so.Nope. Sorry but that's merely your accusation. Your saying that doesn't mean it's so.
You don't know there's anything incriminating about testimony not coming forth due to Executive Privilege. You're entitled to your opinion on that but you have no facts to make your claim.
OK fair enough. So what do you have. Let's just say you have the nation pretty well split down the middle on this issue. Knowing therefore that the Founding Fathers demanded that there should be a super majority (2/3rds of the Senate) to believe whatever has risen to the level of an impeachable offence to remove a President than are you willing to go along with the Founders will? Obviously the Founders understood that the populace would have to accept without falling apart that it's OK for both sides to be thinking a certain way but you should hold tight and don't allow the nation to disintegrate over it.It’s based on the phone call where Trump flat out asks for a favor. You insisting there’s nothing wrong with that doesn’t make it so.
The denial from Trump's supporters about the evidence is astounding. You're dismissing it with absolutely no supporting justification of dismissing it. The "second hand" information claim is nonsense. No one has refuted the testimony in any way, shape, or form.
The Russians collaborated with the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton Campaign, not the Republican National Committee or the Trump organization.
If you expect pro-Donald talking points to be consistent, you're just setting yourself up for disappointment.The claim back in 2016 was that Hillary would try to provoke a war with Russia. That having Trump be friendly with Putin was better for us than Hillary being antagonistic.
Hey, remember when "Schiff" claimed that the stock market would crash if Donald was impeached?
And when "Schiff's" supporters warned of a civil war if Donald were to actually be removed?
No, there was consistent testimony that Donald was attempting to trade foreign aid with having that country's leader interfere in our elections.Not maybe just a groundless accusation?
OK fair enough. So what do you have. Let's just say you have the nation pretty well split down the middle on this issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?