• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

kimber1

mean people suck
Feb 25, 2003
13,143
810
54
Va.
Visit site
✟45,863.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
i understand that debi, but that's the CATHOLIC POV and unfortunately not everyone is Catholic
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
kimber1 said:
i understand that debi, but that's the CATHOLIC POV and unfortunately not everyone is Catholic
No they are not.... but I was addressing you under the mistaken thought of something else so go on dear Sister ..... Sorry to have interrupted you in your argumentation ....
 
Upvote 0

Rochir

By Grabthar's hammer ... YES.WEEK.END!
Sep 27, 2004
13,786
1,930
In your lap
Visit site
✟38,651.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

You know, that would be even ok, if at the same time liberal Christians would not be punished if in their own forum they post and teach that gays and lebsians are welcome in the church and that e.g. abortions under certain circumstance are indeed acceptable!

The right to teach according to your faith should extend to all!
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am all for equality here and what is good for the goose is good for the gander ..... since when have you ever seen me post a post like that in this fora that was not objective Rochir?

That means that every Faith would be able to teach their teachings ..... that is only fair .... I may not agree with some others but that is not my DECISION to make and I can then take that subject to the fora specified to be able to debate it .... can I not?
 
Upvote 0

kimber1

mean people suck
Feb 25, 2003
13,143
810
54
Va.
Visit site
✟45,863.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
no problem debi. i know where you're coming from and you where i'm coming from. all i want is fairness to all not only to one piece of the puzzle.

The right to teach according to your faith should extend to all!
that's it right there in a nutshell
 
Upvote 0

Rochir

By Grabthar's hammer ... YES.WEEK.END!
Sep 27, 2004
13,786
1,930
In your lap
Visit site
✟38,651.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
debiwebi said:
When faced with the decision of having to follow God's Law or man's Law who do we follow first? GOD'S ....

And what exactly God's Law is has been under debate from the inception of Christianity onwards!

I am sorry, but your way of arguing implies that there is only one way - your way! Sorry to say but that is not what goes on in this world. in the real world, you have millions of Christians rejecting abortion and homosexuality, and you have millions of Christians accepting these two subjects and embracing them!

It is fine if you declare your view about God's Law on this site - it should be equally valid and proper to voice other opinions about the same Law!
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,346
1,474
38
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟140,803.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
debiwebi said:
True and I see where you are coming from .... and agree that it would be easier for you to be able to post without retribution ....

Lovingly In Christ
Debi
Well, I wasn't talking about myself, because I'm not homosexual... But I'm sure there are people on CF who are in homosexual relationships.
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
OldShepherd said:
It does. Any, pro, con, neutral, discussion of the morality of the listed topics will be restricted to the forums listed.
True but how can ANY POV be truly expressed adequately to someone that is searching in their own FAITH if it is cinstantly being contradicted by another?

Thus the reason why it should be extended that if a Catholic wants to know the Catholic POV then they should be allowed to discuss it in OBOB and if a Methodist want sto know a Methodist POV they should be allowed to discuss in the Methodist forum ect .... this way they are not getting conflicting POV that will only hinder them from understanding ....

This is often the problem that we encounter, as I deal with many newbies, or Catechumens that are then asking me questions privately because they go to these forums, and so much information is being given to them they cannot decipher it all ....

This is a matter of respecting someone and respecting the Faiths on the board to be able to express their doctrines and morals freely to one another.... I can understand that open debate about such issues amongst all of us should be limited to certain forums, but I do not understand why we respectively cannot talk about such issues within our own confines.....
 
Reactions: Rising_Suns
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
:: Starlight :: said:
Well, I wasn't talking about myself, because I'm not homosexual... But I'm sure there are people on CF who are in homosexual relationships.
Sorry starlight, I should not have assumed .... please forgive me a sinner
 
Upvote 0

pdudgeon

Traditional Catholic
Site Supporter
In Memory Of
Aug 4, 2005
37,852
12,353
South East Virginia, US
✟493,233.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

yep, it's covered right here:
f. depicts self-harm, suicide, cruelty to animals or harm towards others

abortion harms the fetus and as such is covered under this rule.
 
Reactions: Avatar
Upvote 0

JesusFreak2006

Active Member
Feb 13, 2006
39
7
41
Were every day is CHRIST mas
✟194.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
pdudgeon said:
yep, it's covered right here:
f. depicts self-harm, suicide, cruelty to animals or harm towards others

abortion harms the fetus and as such is covered under this rule.

Great defense!
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

This is true to an extent and I say an extent because even Erwin has defined what is scripturally a biblical marriage and what is not.... he has also then declared that objective proof must be provided to support such opinions .... therefore it is not just an opinion of someone is it but one that is backed up with objective proof .... going back to rule 1, we see what that proof can consist of ....


1.3 You will only post negative statements about another individual’s belief or religious organization (including non-Christian religions) with objective evidence provided. Members are allowed to say “The doctrines X church is false because of Y scriptures and Z other relevant evidence”.

Now as I have had explained to me by the Admins of this site and if I am wrong here they may correct me as necessary.... Just because one rule stands in one section does not mean that it does not also have to be taken in light of the other rules as a whole. Therefore in context of the rules rule 4.2 and this rule would coincide with one another, making the rule of substantiation necessary with objective evidence.... Then considering that some people might consider the fact that if your opinion states that because they are doing this and that they are not then Christian .... this rule would then apply

1.5You will not directly state or otherwise imply that another member is not a Christian if he or she falls under Rule 6.5 and 6.6 and he or she does not have a hidden faith icon without providing substantiation from scripture or doctrine or historic church writtings.

This then tells you the proof required .....

Now I may be corrected here but this is the way that I have been taught to read the rules properly so as to follow them, and so as not to infringe upon them .....
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,577
27,116
76
Lousianna
✟1,016,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

So, if a post simply discusses one's abortions (etc) in a manner that presents this as a normal (morally neutral) aspect of life without specifically stating that it is normal it's OK anywhere on CF?

EXAMPLES (Post in female teen forum):

The last month my lesbian partner had an abortion which was an answer to prayer.

(Post in male teen forum)

Anyone know where to go for an inexpensive abortion?

(Teen forum post)

Any advice on the process of getting a gender change? I am finally ready for this step.

AND in these examples any responses that challenge these acts as sin is subject to moderator action?

CF will be a very different place under the new rule.


Sad.
 
Upvote 0

Avatar

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2004
549,102
56,600
Cape Breton
✟740,518.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
The Lord's Envoy said:
Homosexuality is morally offensive to God and Christians. Abortion is morally offensive to God and to Christians. Extramarital Sex is morally offensive to God and to Christians, etc.

No. Yes. Yes.
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

umm these are situations that I did not think of ..... WOW! what if this did come up? then this means that essentially if it wasn't posted in the forums specified then we could say nothing to dissuade the person ....

AS CHRISTIANS we have an obligation to!!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,346
1,474
38
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟140,803.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Why sad? It's just that the morality of it can't be discussed in any way... It can't be promoted, but it also can't be condenmed.
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Avatar said:
No. Yes. Yes.
Yes yes & yes ..... there is a Catholic icon by your name am I right and did you just say that homosexuality was not morally offensive to God? Just asking for clarification here..... As I want to make clear that according to the Church and Her Teachings it is....
 
Upvote 0

Debi1967

Proudly in love with Rushingwind62
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2003
20,540
1,129
58
Green Valley, Illinios
Visit site
✟94,055.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
:: Starlight :: said:
Why sad? It's just that the morality of it can't be discussed in any way... It can't be promoted, but it also can't be condenmed.
In all the situations that he stated he stated situations that would illicit promotion of some sort of the act......
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.