Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That would be the supreme court. Perhaps you should look up what supreme means. They ruled, this is the meaning, this is the law.
There is no law in Alabama giving sanction to same-sex unions.
Except it does. See, because the supreme court ruled that it does, it does. You can disagree, you can flap your arms and hold your breath until you go blue in the face, you can stay in denial, but the fact remains that the supreme court's interpretation of the law is binding. If you don't like their interpretation, appeal. But if you try to ignore rulings you just don't like, you can expect to get the pants sued off of you.It does not apply in this situation, even though 5 ideologues used that argument to push their ideological agenda.
They overstepped there too. Where in the Constitution
is the stated power of the feds to control marriage or
decide what medications are legal or illegal for that
matter?
ANYTHING not written in the Constitution as a power of
the feds is a power belonging to the states and/or the people.
Actually Trump doesn't care about SSM or where one goes to the bathroom. As an aside, the governor ofAlabama is about to be impeached.Can't you guys send him, Trump and Arpaio (sp?) off to an island somewhere where they can be an arm each of their own government and leave normal people alone?
I can't help but notice that those supporting Moore are ignoring the question as to whether Loving vs. Virginia was valid decision. So let me ask again. Did the Supreme Court have the right to strike down laws prohibiting interracial marriage?
I have, many times. If you think you know part of it
that I'm missing, feel free to show me up on here. I
can take it. What is the enumerated power of the
federal government to control marriage or the Supreme
Court to pass laws in place of the legislature?
Actually Trump doesn't care about SSM or where one goes to the bathroom. As an aside, the governor ofAlabama is about to be impeached.
Instead of building a wall between the US and Mexico, we probably would be better off with one between the US and Alabama.
Of course not! Of course, since it was a unanimous decision, that means we had nine ideologues trying to legislate morality who needed to be booted off the bench!
Two very different issues.I can't help but notice that those supporting Moore are ignoring the question as to whether Loving vs. Virginia was valid decision. So let me ask again. Did the Supreme Court have the right to strike down laws prohibiting interracial marriage?
Two very different issues.
Skin pigmentation is genetic. Sexual behavior is a choice.
Skin pigmentation is not a moral issue. Sexual choices are.I don't believe either one is mentioned in the Constitution and remember, the Supreme Court isn't supposed to legislate morality. So the question remains if the federal government cannot rule on the constitutionality of state marriage laws isn't Loving vs. Virginia a wrong decision? If they can't rule on the constitutionality of state marriage laws then obviously it is.
But it looks like to me your argument is they can't rule on those state marriage laws you don't want them to rule on.
Two very different issues.
Skin pigmentation is genetic. Sexual behavior is a choice.
Skin pigmentation is not a moral issue. Sexual choices are.
Yes, marriage is a choice, but the issue of mixed marriage is skin pigmentation, not whether a man wanted to have sex with another man.Including the choice to get married.
Yes, marriage is a choice, but the issue of mixed marriage is skin pigmentation, not whether a man wanted to have sex with another man.
Skin pigmentation is not a moral issue. Sexual choices are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?