Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
LOL, the ignorance of the spiritually dead leads to the foolish belief that humanism has won.
Keep worshipping your human gods.
Once again, no laws have been made. The judge didn't break any laws.
Nope, I am saying the non-Christians are spiritually dead. Ephesians 2:1Are you trying to say that the christians in this thread aren't christians?
Actually they do make laws. In our country there are four sources of law; the Constitution, legislation, administrative regulations and the common law. But in this case what matters is that judges also apply the law to certain situations and in this case the Supreme Court has found that the 14th prevents denying a marriage license over matters of gender. Now Justice Moore can think that is a incorrect finding and disagree with it, but as an officer of the court he is bound to abide by it.I get it. You choose to imagine that judges make law, which is wrong.
Unfortunately despite petitions to Alabama Supreme Court, SSM is still in tact in Alabama.Does Alabama have a law that acknowledges same-sex unions? If not, there is no requirement that the judge allow them. The federal government is subservient to the States in regard to marriage license. The judge would be within his legal rights.
The federal government overrides the state in constitutional rulings. Hence why interracial marriage bans at the state level were struck down.
They interpret the laws that already exist.
Actually, he's not...And who keeps Roy Moore in check?
Actually they do make laws. In our country there are four sources of law; the Constitution, legislation, administrative regulations and the common law.
The 14th amendment was invoked by the supreme court when they said SSM was to be legal. They also cast down DOMA if I remember right but that was before the SSM decision.No, those were stupid laws and the states backed down.
If you read the bill of rights, the states overrule the feds,
not the other way around.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Actually they do make laws. In our country there are four sources of law; the Constitution, legislation, administrative regulations and the common law. But in this case what matters is that judges also apply the law to certain situations and in this case the Supreme Court has found that the 14th prevents denying a marriage license over matters of gender. Now Justice Moore can think that is a incorrect finding and disagree with it, but as an officer of the court he is bound to abide by it.
Roy Moore didn't break any laws.
I get it. You choose to imagine that judges make law, which is wrong.
Nope, I am saying the non-Christians are spiritually dead.
Once again, no laws have been made. The judge didn't break any laws.
LOL, the ignorance of the spiritually dead leads to the foolish belief that humanism has won.
Judges can use case law to help in their present decisions, but they never make laws.Actually they do make laws. In our country there are four sources of law; the Constitution, legislation, administrative regulations and the common law. But in this case what matters is that judges also apply the law to certain situations and in this case the Supreme Court has found that the 14th prevents denying a marriage license over matters of gender. Now Justice Moore can think that is a incorrect finding and disagree with it, but as an officer of the court he is bound to abide by it.
Of course it sounds like a victory to someone who is intolerant of Godly morality and Christian virtues. It's the progressive way.And yet Moore's off the bench again -- sounds like a victory to me.
No, those were stupid laws and the states backed down.
If you read the bill of rights, the states overrule the feds,
not the other way around.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Judges can use case law to help in their present decisions, but they never make laws.
Then how would you explain such civil offenses such as conversion?Actually, judges cannot make laws. In this country there are three branches of invested powers. The Executive, The Legislative, and the Judicial.
The Legislative pass the bills that only become law under the presidents signature. Or if he deems not to sign, the bill passes into law without that signature.
The Judicial branch interprets the laws. Period.
States control marriage laws and education according to the Constitution. The feds have zero say over those laws, except that the SCOTUS can declare State laws unconstitutional. The feds cannot make laws on issues that are designated to the States. This is why the fed threatens loss of funding to the States as a way of bullying the States into doing federal wishes. States that don't need or want federal funding can tell the feds suck it and the feds can't do a thing about it.No, they didn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia#Implications_of_the_decision
No. Federal law overrides state law. That is why the feds could still prosecute Marijuana in Washington and Colorado. The section you are quoting only talks about the delegation of powers.
Judges can use case law to help in their present decisions, but they never make laws.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?