vossler said:
I've always suspected that scientists weren't the most God fearing people around. That was based on some of my previous points I made where science and God always seemed like oil and water.
So your posts are based on your previous posts. Ok then.
However, since coming here to CF this observation has really proven itself in so many ways. If one goes to the C&E area you'll see how separating God from science is tantamount to the ability to perform good science. You might say that this comes only from non-Christians, yet with few exceptions most Christians have a similar view.
Actually, so long as we're talking about separating religious beliefs (even including the belief in God) from the scientific method, then I 100% agree.
Think of it this way: when you observe something you don't understand, is your first explanation "It's a miracle!"
or "Hmm... that's odd, let's see if we can figure this out..."
IMO, his public recognition of God was only a small part of what made him such a good Christian scientist. The fact that he relied upon God for inspiration and direction is what truly made him a good scientist.
And we only know that he relied upon God because he made a point to let poeple know this. Others may choose to keep the matter private, between God and themselves... and I think we've agreed that they have every right to do so.
If I had, before posting his testimony, said that scientists should bring God into their scientific experiments, I believe most people here at CF would have attacked that statement.
Indeed. It does help that you qualified your statement and shown an example how a person's beliefs can work within a scientific framework without potentially contaminating the results.
The problem is that you're using "God" and "A person's religious beliefs" interchangably.
Yes, but the preferred way is in public.
Preferred by whom?
And even so, what is the difference? God gets the glory either way.
I personally don't know how one can believe in God and not believe he was involved with the process of life. Wouldn't this be an inept god and thereby no god at all?
Not to change the subject...looking at life as it is... with all its flawed, vestigal, jury-rigged, and downright inefficent designs, then one might argue that God does have some explaining to do.
YECs can easily dismiss all this as a result of The Fall, which, theologically, is a sound answer, but from a scientific perspective, is as worthless as claiming "It's a miracle" and closing the book on it.
That same Gallup poll stated that 87% of Americans call themselves Christians, or at least appear to do so. I believe if half of those actually were we would be fortunate.
Not our place to judge without proof. If 87% of Americans call themselves our brothers and sisters in Christ, then 87% of them are... unless we have some reason to think they lied on the poll.
That would mean 40 - 45% of Americans were Christian. Using that same methodology then only 20 - 25% of scientists are Christians. It's not quite so narrow now.
Only because you've just called every other person who claims to be saved a liar. Are you in posession of some special insight into their souls that the rest of us lack?
I don't know about you, but I'm gathering information.
As am I... and making sure the information being gathered is accurate and honest.