Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sure. Ever hear the phrase 'neo-Darwinist race theories' before?Frumious Bandersnatch said:John, Did you ever hear the phrase one trick pony?
F.B.
john crawford said:Sure. Ever hear the phrase 'neo-Darwinist race theories' before?
Thanks. I clicked on the link and answered a few posts. Now, what point have you proved that I prove by posting on this second thread?TheBear said:He still doesn't get it. And this is the second thread I started, which proves the point.
http://www.christianforums.com/t2459116-biological-racism.html
No way, as you say - "That doesnt make any sense .."abbismonster said:John Crawford, your saying that by saying that the descendents of humans that lived in Africa were primitive, we are claiming all black people are primitive?
Back when?people living in asia were primitive, people who moved to europe were primitive, they were all primitive back then.
I had a hunch. I looked around all the various threads in this forum. Your participation in threads that have nothing to do with the topic of racism is rare at best. You post almost exclusively in threads where the topic is about racism, (real or imagined), and dominate those threads, (have the most number of posts by at least double of anyone else's). So I say to myself, 'This guy is really fixated and obsessed on racism. But, maybe I'm wrong.' So, I tested that theory by creating two other threads with 'racism' in the title. And sure enough, in short order you were right there, posting at least twice as much as the closest runner-up in each of the new threads.john crawford said:Thanks. I clicked on the link and answered a few posts. Now, what point have you proved that I prove by posting on this second thread?
TheBear said:Test complete.
Mods, you can close this thread now.
Apos said:You know, you've dodged this question so many times that it sems pretty rock solid obvious that you are just putting us all on here. But in the hopes that just mayeb you are amenable to a sensible discussion, we'll try this one last time.
Dannager said:It's funny, they've become one-trick ponies. john zeros in on the whole racism thing, and dad sticks to his convictions of a merged past universe.
http://www.jay-matternes.com/Hominids.htmlGrengor said:No he's saying that since in the Out of Africa model, Neanderthals were killed of or died out on natural means, it means that the ToE is racist. Not only does the ToE not say this, but it's a gross stretch of even the regular "ToE is racist" argument.
I'm no more obsessed or fixated on racism than you are on evolution. As far as I'm concerned, evolution is racism, so every time someone posts something on evolution, I have to point out the inherent racism in all theories of human evolution. To prove your point or theory, and to fully complete the test, just start a thread on evolution and I will be right there to point out that all theories of human evolution are racially biased and bigoted. As long as neo-Darwinist race theorists continue to call and classify all Jews, Christians and Muslims descendents of monkey and ape ancestors, I recommend that all Jews, Christians and Muslims call and classify all neo-Darwinist theories of ape and human evolution racially bigoted, prejudiced and biased.TheBear said:I had a hunch. I looked around all the various threads in this forum. Your participation in threads that have nothing to do with the topic of racism is rare at best. You post almost exclusively in threads where the topic is about racism, (real or imagined), and dominate those threads, (have the most number of posts by at least double of anyone else's). So I say to myself, 'This guy is really fixated and obsessed on racism. But, maybe I'm wrong.' So, I tested that theory by creating two other threads with 'racism' in the title. And sure enough, in short order you were right there, posting at least twice as much as the closest runner-up in each of the new threads.
I wouldn't know since I'm not concerned with animal husbandry, breeding different species or races of dogs, or poodle and Great Dane racism.billwald said:"Race" is the equivalent of "breed" as used in animal husbandry. Is it "racist" to claim that poodles are different than Great Danes?
john crawford said:I'm no more obsessed or fixated on racism than you are on evolution. As far as I'm concerned, evolution is racism, so every time someone posts something on evolution, I have to point out the inherent racism in all theories of human evolution. To prove your point or theory, and to fully complete the test, just start a thread on evolution and I will be right there to point out that all theories of human evolution are racially biased and bigoted. As long as neo-Darwinist race theorists continue to call and classify all Jews, Christians and Muslims descendents of monkey and ape ancestors, I recommend that all Jews, Christians and Muslims call and classify all neo-Darwinist theories of ape and human evolution racially bigoted, prejudiced and biased.
After all, we have more historical evidence of neo-Darwinist racial bigotry, bias and prejudice than neo-Darwinist race theorists have of our evolution from African ape ancestors.
First we distinguish between hairy ape hominids and human hominids in the past just like we distinguish between hairy apes and modern humans today. You can make that distinction, I assume.Apos said:Please explain how the idea that ALL modern humans are descended from a population of early hominids that originated in Africa is racist. In ANY way shape or form. Please even explain how the mere location of these hominids being in Africa has anything at all to do in particular with the people who in the modern day happen to live in Africa.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?