Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
SirKenin said:You have no right to judge whether or not someone is a believer by their sins. Man knows the outside, but only God knows the heart. I can't know that. You can't know that. Nobody can know that but God, so really your question is impertinent and not worth spending any more time on.
SirKenin said:She can always leave and stay single because you can NOT show me a verse in the Bible that provides for her remarriage.
Grishnak said:Sure I can.
She is divorced, unmarried, loosed from a spouse.
Whats funny, and Ive let this one slide, is you say Paul said ''let the unbeliever leave" and then pretend he said its ok to remarry after when actaully, he gives no such advice
So how do you conclude that one can remarry if the unbeliever leaves?
Grishnak said:Holy Cow-Monkeys, I think Im gonna swallow my tongue here.
So Paul went a step FURTHER than Jesus had?
WOW !!
Paul shows that what? "You can't hold a non-believer accountable to Jesus' teachings"
YAY
We're finally getting somewhere
So Jesus only permitted ONE item for divorce, then Paul, realizing that, hey, you cant MAKE an unbelieving spouse behave themselves, so why should the BELIEVER have to pay for the UNbelievers behavior the rest of their lives
SirKenin said:To the advice itself, which is that if an unbelieving husband or wife were pleased to dwell with a Christian relative, the other should not separate. The husband should not put away an unbelieving wife, nor the wife leave an unbelieving husband, v. 12, 13. The Christian calling did not dissolve the marriage covenant, but bind it the faster, by bringing it back to the original institution, limiting it to two persons, and binding them together for life. The believer is not by faith in Christ loosed from matrimonial bonds to an unbeliever, but is at once bound and made apt to be a better relative. But, though a believing wife or husband should not separate from an unbelieving mate, yet if the unbelieving relative desert the believer, and no means can reconcile to a cohabitation, in such a case a brother or sister is not in bondage (v. 15), not tied up to the unreasonable humour, and bound servilely to follow or cleave to the malicious deserter, or not bound to live unmarried after all proper means for reconciliation have been tried, at least of the deserter contract another marriage or be guilty of adultery, which was a very easy supposition, because a very common instance among the heathen inhabitants of Corinth. In such a case the deserted person must be free to marry again, and it is granted on all hands. And some think that such a malicious desertion is as much a dissolution of the marriage-covenant as death itself. For how is it possible that the two shall be one flesh when the one is maliciously bent to part from or put away the other? Indeed, the deserter seems still bound by the matrimonial contract; and therefore the apostle says (v. 11), If the woman depart from her husband upon the account of his infidelity, let her remain unmarried. But the deserted party seems to be left more at liberty (I mean supposing all the proper means have been used to reclaim the deserter, and other circumstances make it necessary) to marry another person. It does not seem reasonable that they should be still bound, when it is rendered impossible to perform conjugal duties or enjoy conjugal comforts, through the mere fault of their mate: in such a case marriage would be a state of servitude indeed. But, whatever liberty be indulged Christians in such a case as this, they are not allowed, for the mere infidelity of a husband or wife, to separate; but, if the unbeliever be willing, they should continue in the relation, and cohabit as those who are thus related. This is the apostles general direction.
Do you want me to start showing that Jesus Christ is the SAME forever and that He is indeed GOD and that He was there before the foundations of the world?SirKenin said:He NEVER used that example to show that it was ok to break HIS commandments, so your argument is invalid.
Thats your arguement?Jesus also broke Deuteronomic Law, so he was not being hypocritical. The concept of mercy was directed at the Scribes and Pharisees.
Jesus never broke his commandments, so he was not being hypocritical.
WHOA....slow down cowboy.Mercy was not a provision to use as an excuse to break Jesus' commandments at will.
He was able to follow them to the letter.If that's the case why did Jesus waste his time giving them to us to begin with? Why did he follow them to the letter?
Keep praying about that flirting problem.Because you are expected to as well. He was setting an example that you are expected to follow.
JUst as David will be judged for eating that showbread when he had a extraordinary need.You will be judged on that final day based upon your adherence. God is not going to be sitting there going "Oh, you broke this law, this law and this law on purpose, in defiance of Jesus? Hmm. Well this is your lucky day. I've decided to let that slide today". Isn't going to happen. You will be judged according to your deeds and misdeeds here on earth, abuse of the concept of mercy or not.
Whats funny about your commentary is that I can find other commentaries that will disagree.In fact, Paul was saying nonbelievers can't be held accountable for breaking the commandments, because they don't believe in them to begin with. If you even bothered reading the first commentary that I posted (from Matthew Henry) you would realize that Paul is saying just let the rebel go, but the believer is not allowed to initiate the divorce.
dittoIt's about time your started doing a little more reading and a little less condescending and pretending to know everything.
You say you have a young daughter, I think.Time to forget about trying to work your way around the truth by abusing the concept of mercy. We are told by Paul not to test God's grace, and that is exactly what you are advocating.
SirKenin said:You have no right to judge whether or not someone is a believer by their sins. Man knows the outside, but only God knows the heart. I can't know that. You can't know that. Nobody can know that but God, so really your question is impertinent and not worth spending any more time on.
babyangel said:Trust me I have told him everything under the sun. And talked and talked and talked. He said he would not go to counceling and I have the problems, I need sex counceling (as stated earlier I cant have sex with someone I can not trust or respect for obvious reasons, sex was good before) I need to just get over it.
Just like when I was depressed with postpartum depression and asked for help (ie stay home and keep me company) he was always out. His reponse was get over it or I will leave you. Also he has said if you go through bad menopause I will leave you. Were is the love and support and encouragement I need. I dont know how menoupause will hit me, but what if I need help and he just leaves me at that point or abuses me even more because I may have verbal outbursts. I cant trust this person.
I am scared if I was paralized he would rape me against my will. I do not want to live life in fear. I also wanted to say we dated 6 years before marriage and we never fought, nothing to fight about. Then when we married I had to keep silent no opinion at all.
I took it for 10 years and finally 5 years ago could not take anymore. Things were so so for 5years that is where I did my talking saying I am not happy get counceling, etc. He didnt take it seriously and kept going. Things just got worse and finally last year I asked him to leave. I thought it would be a wake up call yet he doesnt change. How long do I need to wait? Especially since he says he wants to divorce me.
Crazy Liz said:Does this mean what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 7 is illusory, since the believing spouse cannot know whether the spouse who left is a believer or an unbeliever?
ah.She is not divorced for the two reasons given in the Bible. In those two verses you quoted, if Paul was to imply that the divorced and widows could get remarried contrary to Jesus' and his own teachings, that would make him a heretic and a hypocrite.
So no you can't.
OH NOCrazy Liz said:Does this mean what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 7 is illusory, since the believing spouse cannot know whether the spouse who left is a believer or an unbeliever?
babyangel said:See what those kind of "restrictions" does to a person. That is not what the bible is for. Bottom line for my dollar is God knows all and sees all. Only he can be the judge and I know I have done nothing wrong. And my husband is yes worse than an unbeliver the bible says so (help me out grish I cant remember the verse) but it talks about not providing for the family etc which he doesnt. So wouldnt one that is worse than an unbeliever infact be considered an unbeliever??
Grishnak said:We do the best we can given our lives and hope that God willl forgive our shortcomings, that He will show MERCY when life wont allow us to do EXACTLY what HIs word commands.
seebs said:Heh. You could go to a counselor and come back saying "they need both of us to do this".
Did he post here in the past? We had a guy with that attitude for a while.
I am so sorry. I can't help; I can offer a little comfort, but not much help. If this man is unwilling to work on the relationship, there's not much left to do.
This is very wrong. He doesn't seem to have any idea what marriage is about. He should be overjoyed to have a wife who is willing to talk to him and share her opinions.
I see two possibilities. One is that he's having an affair, the other is that he's being an idiot. He doesn't seem to appreciate you.
The one good chance I see is that if you walk, he may realize that he actually does like you.
But man o man.
How many kids have you got, and what ages? Do they know that something's up?
What religion, if any, is your husband? If he's religious, have you talked to a pastor or whatever about this? Not that it always helps; some churches have really dysfunctional marriage teachings.
But... I dunno. I don't know that we can help, but I can tell you that you are loved. I can tell you that you are not wrong to be unhappy, and that your husband owes you more than he is giving you. I can pray for you.
Thank you Grishnak.Grishnak said:We do the best we can given our lives and hope that God willl forgive our shortcomings, that He will show MERCY when life wont allow us to do EXACTLY what HIs word commands.
seebs said:It doesn't make him an unbeliever, just not a good spouse.
I am very sorry people are attacking you.
At this point, I would suggest that instead of bulling through all of Paul's writings trying to get a clear answer on this circumstance, you take a break and read the Gospel according to John. Just read through it enjoying the beautiful language, and hear the words of your Savior. It will be more edifying, I promise.
Whats truely amazing to me is to see that Deut 24:1 was written to protect the woman from abuse or even death at the hands of her husband, and to make sure she was provided for in a manner that she could be married again having a divorce decree.heartnsoul said:Thank you Grishnak.I echo Seeb's post. Our God is a compassionate God who does show us mercy, love and forgiveness. Those who do not know God that way will be humbled by God someday. I believe the mark of a truly spiritually mature believer is someone who really knows who God is. I am grateful to have personally experienced God's love and forgiveness...and guess what? I was divorced and remarried and God didn't kick me to the curb...instead he blessed me continuously. Others on this forum have also been blessed after a divorce and remarriage. What an awesome God we have!
Grishnak said:What blows my mind is that in BOTH cases the WOMAN is the one having to be defended both by Moses and then by Jesus.
Its like, no matter how many time men are told to honor their wives, many will find a way to abuse her.
And many will also find a way to excuse that abuse.
huh.Crazy Liz said:And then so-called Christian men twist Jesus' words to say you can divorce but you can't remarry, again keeping the woman in bondage.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?