Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
With a little help from artists too, I imagine?Living things look designed because they ARE designed - by the trial-and-error process of natural selection.
Huh, I've always thought it was a mess inherently wrought with problems. I gotta' stop reading.Tried, tested and proven.
With a little help from artists too, I imagine?
Find a tooth and a skull cap and next thing you know -- voila:
Any evidence homo erectus and neanderthals had bone diseases?As bone-diseased humans, who were once contributing members of the human race.
What? Tucked in bed with a fair damsel to keep him warm?In fact, the two middle ones remind me of what King David may have looked like, just before he died.
strawman. Thats not my argument.Bacteria cannot turn into pink unicorns.
you seem to be writing in english but your not using it in any recognizable pattern.The fact is you are here. And you have your beliefs about how you got here, not the pink unicorn. That you have attributed to chance. That is your belief. You may attempt to divert attention but start with the human body.
this word does not exist in common dictionaries. You are alos not using the 'a' properly. the use of the a simply implies that your not a materialist. But that doesn't mean your an anti materialist.I am in fact, an amaterialist.
Why? that has nothing to do with evolution. If you want i can start fighting straw men too.Nope, you have to show evidence that chance can build the two story wooden house. Science shows that it is designed.
And yet the Pyramid themselves are not evidence. It is the details and specifics about the structure that gives it design qualities. Humans do not have these qualities and in many cases contradict all logical design. If god desighned us he is a really bad designer.No, chance cannot build the great pyramid. Tests, along with the integrated complexity of said structure including the language embedded within is design.
Please show that would keep mutations from accumulating. This must be shown in order for your position to even be considered.Another day chief. And no, not because your muscles get larger it will invariably continue. Or that because a horse gets faster it will invariably continue. There is only adaptation. A feature of design. If you need evidence of bacteria remaining bacteria it is readily available.
again using that language but in no meaningful order.Atheism is not required. Science is sufficient. So Darwinism may remain where it is.
Thats your belief.
*bzzz* wrong answer. however you did unknowing just admit you solid foundation for your argument.I don't have to present anything.
See i provide evidence. You... you provide a desire for your position to be self evident when its not. this is
LOL strange how these bone deseased humans fall perfectly into a nested hierarchy.As bone-diseased humans, who were once contributing members of the human race.
In fact, the two middle ones remind me of what King David may have looked like, just before he died.
Yes -- I'm familiar with how scientists use computers to prophesy to them.We know this works, because human designers actually set up algorithms like this in order to design things, and the results are often astonishing and counter-intuitive.
So we know that the Darwinian algorithm is an effective designing agent. Which is, as I said, why things look designed.
strawman. Thats not my argument.
you seem to be writing in english but your not using it in any recognizable pattern.
I'm an amaterialistthis word does not exist in common dictionaries. You are alos not using the 'a' properly. the use of the a simply implies that your not a materialist. But that doesn't mean your an anti materialist.
You'll get it.Why? that has nothing to do with evolution. If you want i can start fighting straw men too.
The pyramid is evidence of the pyramid designers. If you encounter a 600 million year old pyramid and your belief entailed that there was no intelligence around capable of building this structure, your view, as a late observer has to change. Not history.And yet the Pyramid themselves are not evidence. It is the details and specifics about the structure that gives it design qualities. Humans do not have these qualities and in many cases contradict all logical design. If god desighned us he is a really bad designer.
Like I told you, another time. You are the one who has to show mutations accumulate. All evidence shows that there is a limit. See...anything.Please show that would keep mutations from accumulating. This must be shown in order for your position to even be considered.
Its snipping time already?*bzzz* wrong answer. however you did unknowing just admit you solid foundation for your argument.
Your evidence is my evidence actually. Limited adaptation. If you want to show that a man will eventually turn into a forklift, you need more than muscles getting larger and smaller. To be sure, the hijacking of adaptation by atheism is not universally recognized. Not regarded, in creationismSee i provide evidence. You... you provide a desire for your position to be self evident when its not. this is
Yes -- I'm familiar with how scientists use computers to prophesy to them.
Some time ago, I went on a tirade against computer-generated evolutionary paradigms.
Don't get me started again --
LOL -- read that question slowly.Any evidence homo erectus and neanderthals had bone diseases?
That's real cute.What? Tucked in bed with a fair damsel to keep him warm?
Here's your 'trixy Satan':LOL strange how these bone deseased humans fall perfectly into a nested hierarchy.
That trixy Satan.
Here's your 'trixy Satan':
Put them both together, and you have:
He didn't use mud -- mud was the progenitor of spontaneous generation.If God can use mud he can use copy errors.
Wikipedia said:The testaceans (shelled molluscs) are characterized by forming by spontaneous generation in mud...
Except God pronounced His creation "very good" (perfect) in Genesis 1:31.And a copy "error" is only an "error" in the sense that it isn't a faithful copy. It may actually be an improvement.
But they are used to dupe the public -- the koine -- us common people -- (as well as yourselves).Those are non-nested. They are exactly what is conspicuously absent in living things.
I'll take it that's a 'no' then.LOL -- read that question slowly.Any evidence homo erectus and neanderthals had bone diseases?
Any evidence fish are wet?
Speaking of cute.I don't believe I am a Homo sapiens, and by the same token, I don't believe they were Homos, either.
Of courseThat's real cute.
His body wasn't generating enough body heat, and he needed assistance.
He didn't live much longer after that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?