Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Creationist always complain about "atheistic science" as if there was some other form of science. Strangely enough they don't complain how the work on gravity is all "atheistic" or that all of the work on electronics is "atheistic". EE's do not pray to St. Eligius when starting a new project. For some strange reason they pick on evolution.Considering he testified against ID, it's safe to say that he isn't pro-ID
Nobody here claimed that he was. I'm well aware that he's a Christian. So what? Atheism has nothing to do with science.
Nice citation! Seriously that was funny! They kicked out Myers and let Dawkins walk in.
Oh my goodness!!
Amazing hypocrisy and incompetence. How do you recognize PZ and not recognize Dawkins?
But thanks for checking out the link.
Creationist always complain about "atheistic science" as if there was some other form of science.
Oh look, something else you're just objectively wrong about. The term "monotonous" is not just applicable, it wouldn't surprise me if it was invented to describe Stein's drawling tones. This is less "finding Pixels hilarious" (which is still horribly wrong, just for a very different reason) and more "finding a reading of the Encyclopedia Brittanica by a robot hilarious".
Dawkins must have had his white cowboy hat on. That would fool anybody ha ha ha!
Seriously Dawkins can be a jerk, and comically so more recently. PZ Meyers is such a weasel he's alienated most of his fellow atheists. I'm not surprised they barred his attendance.
OP has left the thread a while ago and is now active in a new one concerning the fossile record.I haven't been keeping up with this thread. Is the OP satisfied yet or is he still demanding that evolution be removed from Australian schools?
Okay. Irreducible complexity is not a failed argument, and there are quite a few examples at this point.
Your entire argument is from ignorance. You acknowledge that in your post #687, but more on that in a moment.
Michael Behe is a true stud. Talk about a guy who can stand up and take a punch. His observations on the bacteria flagellum are not busted, but rather alive and doing well. And yes, the list of irreducible structures and processes grows daily.
IC is literally an argument from ignorance / incredulity.
It literally consists of "I don't understand how it became complex, therefor I don't believe that it became complex".
Would anyone please tell us what they think ID theory is?
Creation science is not the same thing as ID.
Yeah you might want to look at it again dude. You look pretty silly right now.
That find was one of the keys to the Dover trial. That was one of the few times he showed any emotion at all, according to Eugenie Scott. His eyebrows rose a bit when that came out. I will see if I can find a YouTube video on it.
No, I'm pretty much spot on.
You are welcome to show me wrong if you think I am.
Ha ha here we go again - will you admit it when I do?
If you actually succeed: happily.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?