selfinflikted
Under Deck
- Jul 13, 2006
- 11,441
- 786
- 46
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Riiight...the majority is only smart when they're voting for something you agree with.
Will of the people or not, I just don't think marriage needs to be a government issue.
Frankly, I don't care who you want to marry...just don't force me to honor a marriage that I don't believe in.
It's not a federal government issue. It always has been a state issue. California voters decided. And now this judge has tried to undo what they decided.
It's not a federal government issue. It always has been a state issue. California voters decided. And now this judge has tried to undo what they decided.
California voters cannot vote on law that violates the Federal Constitution. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend Zaac? Civil rights should also never be up for vote in the first place.It's not a federal government issue. It always has been a state issue. California voters decided. And now this judge has tried to undo what they decided.
Dogstar, I just really don't care.
Well, since you continue to act as God's mouthpiece, apparently he consulted with you.You don't have to believe in it. I don't recall a part in God's word where He reached down from His throne and consulted with Jase or any other sinful man as to what would be sin.
13And what age is that? 5?6?7? Do tell us at what age a person suddenly becomes accountable for his sin?
It's not a federal government issue. It always has been a state issue. California voters decided. And now this judge has tried to undo what they decided.
It's not YOU who we want to recognize our marriages. It's the law.
Unlike you guys, I don't order the impeachment of a judge just because I disagree with his verdict. No majority should ever have the right to vote to deny other people rights.Riiight...the majority is only smart when they're voting for something you agree with.
I agree, it shouldn't be - but it is. Marriage begins and ends with a state issued legal contract. Therefore, it's secular law that matters - not religious dogma.Will of the people or not, I just don't think marriage needs to be a government issue.
Nobody is asking you to honor anyone elses marriage. People are only asking that you let people have the same secular rights that you do. You wouldn't like it if liberals voted to remove your rights - so why should you vote to take away the rights of others?Frankly, I don't care who you want to marry...just don't force me to honor a marriage that I don't believe in.
There are a lot of things in the Constitution not explicitly listed as a right. That's the purpose of the Federal courts - to interpret the law. The founders intentionally made the Constitution vague and overly broad to accomodate future societal changes.They shouldn't have been voting on it to begin with.
If the law truly was unconstitutional, I would expect a judge to overturn it. Sometimes the will of the people is not in accordance with the constitution. I just don't think marriage is a constitutional right, for anyone.
California voters cannot vote on law that violates the Federal Constitution. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend Zaac? Civil rights should also never be up for vote in the first place.
On the contrary. Why do you suppose gays are fighting so hard for the "right" to marry? It's not for the purposes of saying they're married...they've been doing that for years. It's because they want the benefits that heterosexual couples receive from marriage. The only option I'd have as a business owner would be to get rid of ALL benefits for married people so that I wouldn't have to recognize a marriage that I don't view as being Godly.
Riiight...the majority is only smart when they're voting for something you agree with.
Will of the people or not, I just don't think marriage needs to be a government issue.
Frankly, I don't care who you want to marry...just don't force me to honor a marriage that I don't believe in.
On the contrary. Why do you suppose gays are fighting so hard for the "right" to marry? It's not for the purposes of saying they're married...they've been doing that for years. It's because they want the benefits that heterosexual couples receive from marriage. The only option I'd have as a business owner would be to get rid of ALL benefits for married people so that I wouldn't have to recognize a marriage that I don't view as being Godly.
Obviously not per Gays and progressives. ONLY their opinions take power and authority. That's reality talking.
It defies intellectualism to redefine marriage to include same gender spouses. How absurd that two men think they can be husband and wife. Or, two husbands, or, two wives. Two women think they can be each other's wife? Or husband? Insanity is now called academic decision.
How do you keep the Gay Agendaists from invading your Synagouge and kicking you ignorant, intolerant, hateful anti-gay bigots out and from being members?
Oh really? Which Rabbinic Sage would agree with you on that? C'mon now, Jews are not hated the world over because they throw darts better than everyone else.
Per any rabbi that has ever lived, you are not able to make a choice unless you are given other things to choose.
Many are. The great Rabbi's speak well for we Christians.
Then I hope you will be there for us in the coming years when the Gay Agenda comes for our total submission. We will still reject it and them and we will be forced to suffer for this.
Hope to see a safe face in yours.
The Supreme Court has already declared marriage to be a "fundamental basic human right". That is federal law.They didn't. There is nowhere in the Constitution that says everybody has the right to get married anymore than it says everyone has the right to drive a car. o why is that so hard for you to comprehend Jase?
It's a federal issue when states violate the 14th Amendment.You don't have a federal right to marry whomever you want. Those rights are set by the state and always have been.
Neither did blacks or women a few decades ago.There is no civil rights violation. Orientation doesn't have protected status.
On the contrary. Why do you suppose gays are fighting so hard for the "right" to marry? It's not for the purposes of saying they're married...they've been doing that for years. It's because they want the benefits that heterosexual couples receive from marriage. The only option I'd have as a business owner would be to get rid of ALL benefits for married people so that I wouldn't have to recognize a marriage that I don't view as being Godly.
The Supreme Court has already declared marriage to be a "fundamental basic human right". That is federal law.
Loving v. Virginia.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?