Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How exactly does the video substantiate ID?The video substantiates and supports it with evidence galore. Your refusal to acknowledge it doesn't refute it or invalidate it in the least. Not by a long shot and not in your wildest dreams.
The video substantiates and supports it with evidence galore. Your refusal to acknowledge it doesn't refute it or invalidate it in the least. Not by a long shot and not in your wildest dreams.
So if humans can manipulate DNA they are as intelligent as God? Are you sure that's an argument you want to put forward?
That's what you derive from the data? LOL!So if humans can manipulate DNA they are as intelligent as God? Are you sure that's an argument you want to put forward?
Design-based science is leaving Darwin in the dust. "The difference between the MPP and what other people are doing with nanotechnology and biotechnology is that we're trying to think in terms of information science," Murray said. "For a computer scientist like Winfree, the MPP is about the idea that information is the essence of nature," author Marcus Y. Woo explained; "that life is driven by the programming power of DNA." There may well come a day when human-designed molecular algorithms become indistinguishable from "natural" ones. If so, natural selection -- or any other theory of unguided causes -- would become incoherent.
The intelligent design movement may now take a bow and say, "We told you so." We said the DNA code and its algorithms are analogues to computer software; now the latecomers are catching on. We said intelligent design makes predictions and leads to testable conclusions. We said that codes upon codes in hierarchical networks are best explained by intelligent causes rather than undirected processes like mutation and natural selection. We said that intelligent design is a fruitful scientific theory. We said information is a fundamental property of life and the universe.
Now the light has dawned. In spite of their metaphysical preconceptions, Caltech scientists are demonstrating all this.
If Engineers Program DNA, Is It Intelligent Design?
What "data"? It's what your article appears to be saying - humans can manipulate DNA. That proves ID is right. Ergo, humans are on a par with the Intelligent Designer i.e. GodThat's what you derive from the data? LOL!
That's the only conclusion that YOU are able to reach because you deem ED conclusions as unacceptable by default.What "data"? It's what your article appears to be saying - humans can manipulate DNA. That proves ID is right. Ergo, humans are on a par with the Intelligent Designer i.e. God
Design-based science is leaving Darwin in the dust. "The difference between the MPP and what other people are doing with nanotechnology and biotechnology is that we're trying to think in terms of information science," Murray said. "For a computer scientist like Winfree, the MPP is about the idea that information is the essence of nature," author Marcus Y. Woo explained; "that life is driven by the programming power of DNA." There may well come a day when human-designed molecular algorithms become indistinguishable from "natural" ones. If so, natural selection -- or any other theory of unguided causes -- would become incoherent.
The intelligent design movement may now take a bow and say, "We told you so." We said the DNA code and its algorithms are analogues to computer software; now the latecomers are catching on. We said intelligent design makes predictions and leads to testable conclusions. We said that codes upon codes in hierarchical networks are best explained by intelligent causes rather than undirected processes like mutation and natural selection. We said that intelligent design is a fruitful scientific theory. We said information is a fundamental property of life and the universe.
Now the light has dawned. In spite of their metaphysical preconceptions, Caltech scientists are demonstrating all this.
If Engineers Program DNA, Is It Intelligent Design?
That's what you derive from the data? LOL!
Here is the valid conclusion that should be reached:
That's not what the people who made it up testified in court. Where they lying?True! No pretention, the ID position doesn't introduce any religion into the subject.
"There may well come a day when human-designed molecular algorithms become indistinguishable from "natural" ones. If so, natural selection -- or any other theory of unguided causes -- would become incoherent."Lol! we can make artificial snowflakes that are indistinguishable from natural snowflakes, but that doesn't the concept of natural snowflake development incoherent.
Quite; from a theist viewpoint - which is more likely, that - with our limited intelligence - we can mimic natural processes, or that we can do what an omnipotent, omniscient God does?What "data"? It's what your article appears to be saying - humans can manipulate DNA. That proves ID is right. Ergo, humans are on a par with the Intelligent Designer i.e. God
You have not presented any data. Youbcan, whenever you get the urge.That's the only conclusion that YOU are able to reach because you deem ED conclusions as unacceptable by default.
BTW
The response of "What data?"" to me is equivalent to the response of "Ï can't see!" or better yet, the response of "I don't wanna see!"
It isn't irrational to conclude that a program needs a programmer. What is irrational is to conclude that it doesn't.
The video substantiates and supports it with evidence galore.
Your refusal to acknowledge it doesn't refute it or invalidate it in the least. Not by a long shot and not in your wildest dreams.
Actually, the evidence in nature which clearly indicates a programmer is so clear that we are told that people who deny seeing it have absolutely no excuse,.
What makes you so sure that Paul was talking about the particular version of ID that you are pushing?Actually, the evidence in nature which clearly indicates a programmer is so clear that we are told that people who deny seeing it have absolutely no excuse,.
Romans 1:20 NIV
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?