Okay. Cool.
I don't know. Science is working on it.
Okay. Cool.
I don't know. Science is working on it.
My guess is that it has been relegated to the COLD CASE files.Any idea who is paying for said research?
Any idea who is paying for said research?
Obviously, the money comes from baby-eating satanic atheists and Satan and his minions.
Ok, seriously though....
No. And I couldn't care less.
Some funding comes from government, some come from universities, some come from private foundations.
Scientific research is scientific research. No matter who pays for it.
I'ld assume the funding comes from similar places as any other scientific investigation/research project.
I don't see how it matters either. The validity of research is in the research, not in who pays for it.
My guess is that it has been relegated to the COLD CASE files.
Ok. Could you link to this research at least?
Or do I just have to take your word on it.
Not gonna happen, sorry.Read your question then the article to see what applies.
I don't spend my days following every single research team in the world. So no, I don't have any links available. I would have to go look for them and dig them up.
Your answer was that "Science was working on it" and since you are so adamantly pursuing "Dogma" ( set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted)
I would have thought you would avoid such activities and support your dogma with facts.
Your answer was that "Science was working on it" and since you are so adamantly
pursuing "Dogma" ( set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted)
I would have thought you would avoid such activities and support your dogma with facts.
If it was dogma, they wouldn't be doing the research. If it was dogma, they would do no research like creationists.
Where is the creationist research?
What advantage does life have over non-life?
Why would it happen?
What benefit is life to a rock?
How does a rock need life?
What processes point to life forming?
What is the chemical edvantage?
What is the thermal advantage?
What is the density advantage?
What chemical process encourages life over non-life?
How does life produce a benefit over non-living material?
If our solar system had one billion earth like planets in the same orbit, why would life developed on any of them?
What would cause it to happen?
As long as you happen to be on this planet, all these questions should have easy answers.
Any idea who is paying for said research?
Papers on abiogenesis and related fields (such as features of very early life or protein origins in astrobiology) published this year include authors working for/at:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center;
NASA Johnson Space Center;
Massachusetts Institute of Technology;
Florida State University;
University of Kansas;
Konrad Lorenz Institute;
California Institute of Technology;
Cornell University;
Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille;
Stockholm University;
Università di Firenze;
University of Sussex;
University of Sheffield;
Eötvös Loránd University Budapest;
University of Southern California;
Brazilian Center of Physics Research;
Sorbonne Université;
CRNM France;
Aachen University;
University of Belgrade;
The University of Tokyo;
RIKEN Biofunctional Catalyst Research Team;
Weston Observatory of Boston College;
Charles University in Prague;
Technische Universität München;
Universidade de Lisboa;
University of Brussels (Belgium);
American Museum of Natural History.
And probably several dozen others universities and institutions that I don't have the time to find on Google Scholar
If it was dogma, they wouldn't be doing the research. If it was dogma, they would do no research like creationists.
Where is the creationist research?
Those groups of institutions showed on these lists:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?