Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Coming back to one of the original points, how can we ensure that any debate/teaching forum that might be separated (or continued here, as the case may be) becomes flame-free? One does not like the idea of banning - is this the only measure that can be taken with those who continually allow their emotions to overwhelm their logic?
Sometimes I think that this forum has largely become a place for some to vent their frustrations, more than a place for serious discussion of matters.
Perhapsa forum is needed for the venting of frustrations so it doesn't spill over into general discussion! (LOL)
Well I hope you will stick around and that we will become a place of fellowship and edification.I have been posting on CF for abt a month now, but have made very few posts in the Seventh day forum because of what seems to be a lot of animosity and friction between folks in here. I just don't like that and do not want to be a part of it.
Coming back to one of the original points, how can we ensure that any debate/teaching forum that might be separated (or continued here, as the case may be) becomes flame-free? One does not like the idea of banning - is this the only measure that can be taken with those who continually allow their emotions to overwhelm their logic?
Sometimes I think that this forum has largely become a place for some to vent their frustrations, more than a place for serious discussion of matters.
Perhapsa forum is needed for the venting of frustrations so it doesn't spill over into general discussion! (LOL)
It wasn't me and it isn't showing on my end as having been edited, but it does indeed seem to have changed. It's a puzzler to me.did someone edit the "what do you think of my sig out???
hmm weird is all . I hope to come back to the body of Christ and share my vast knowledge . LOL whatever I DON't know ill defend to the end lol Just kidding. LOLIt wasn't me and it isn't showing on my end as having been edited, but it does indeed seem to have changed. It's a puzzler to me.
I am not a big fan of banning members. To me this should always be a last resort.
jtbdad,
I have seen things written about formers adventists that are not true. Yet a former cannot come one here to correct what was said. Will this be considered flaming-some one who cannot answer back?
DRL
I am a supporter of banning. what is the point of rules if there is not consequence. there has to be a line and it has to be drawn. this is not acceptable. in this forum we have people who start controversal thread and then complain about controversy. We have people who say inflamatory things and then complaing about flaming . it is cracy. Logic does not dictate here emotions does. if you don't ban some one how will they learn?
A few may go read the response on DST, but the lies are still allowed to be perpetuated here without consequence. It may even be what they truly believe about other Christians, but a lie is still a lie. Once stated, others believe it too.What used to be encouraged was just to make a post something like " I cannot respond here, but to get my perspective check here: ___________
and put a link to a discussion in Denominational Specific etc.
This is a good question. I think the first thing that should be done is the situation brought to the attention of the moderators. We certainly don't want a persons character attacked and not allow them to defend themselves, but non-Adventists are not permitted to debate. I would ask you to send me a PM outling the situation. I will confer with our policy director and ask him for direction. My guess and this is only a guess is that he will direct me to remove the original accusation.jtbdad,
I have seen things written about formers adventists that are not true. Yet a former cannot come one here to correct what was said. Will this be considered flaming-some one who cannot answer back?
DRL
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?