Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You know we're not talking about simple facts, relatively easily derived by repeatable experiments.
I disagree.Not really.
It is unknown and impossible to find out or study HOW God created everything He did.
We can only study WHAT He created.
Not disputing that, but this topic is about (natural) science:I disagree.It is not impossible to study God's way. And He might reveal some things. In fact, He encourages us to study.
2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
No.Spend as much money as you like and evolution is still the best theory explaining the plethora of facts from paleontology, molecular genetics, and other areas of biology.
And this is not all.No.
As long as there's no natural mechanism for writing purposeful DNA, it's just a naturalistic conviction / assumption.
You ASSUME (because you have no other option as a naturalist) that such miraculous feats occur unintended by copying corrupted data that still runs well enough.
Nobody disputes mutation and natural selection.
We're just not all brainwashed (anymore) into believing it can account for things all of humanity couldn't even accomplish.
And that's because the things that come forth from surviving mutations are hereditary diseases, diminishing gene pools and disappearance of traits, disappearance of kinds / species, rather than improvements and variety.
I might ask you the same question.
I am commanded by the Lord Jesus Christ to preach the Gospel to every creature.
No threats, just fact. Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
And that's because the things that come forth from surviving mutations are hereditary diseases, diminishing gene pools and disappearance of traits, disappearance of kinds / species, rather than improvements and variety.
The level of genius and complexity of living nature, from solar system to the nano technological world in the cells, SCREAMS creation.
i am, i just didn't expect these opinions to be irrational and disgusting at the same time. I've seen people here say "retards" (yes, using this word) are going to hell because their is no excuse for not believing in god. What is that? Then when you try to ask for an intelligent reason why this god is a loving father and just judge in their eyes they go "well, if you knew the truth about christ..." or "who are you to judge God.. our minds are finite".By being here, you show that you are, at the least, interested in Christian opinion ...
It's the only naturalistic theory.No? What better theory exists?
Next question:but think they know the most: study
The study involved genetically modified organisms, where there is little political bias to confuse the issue.
The more extreme the opposition, Fernbach and his co-authors found, the less people knew about the science and genetics, but the more their “self-assessed” knowledge — how much they thought they knew — increased.
“If somebody is well calibrated, those two things should be pretty highly correlated: If I know how much I know, then if I know a little I should say I know a little, and if I know a lot I should say I know a lot,” Fernbach explained. “Therefore there should be a high correlation between self-assessed and objective knowledge.
“And indeed, that’s actually true for the people who are moderate, or people who have the attitude that is consistent with the scientific consensus,” he said.
However, as people become more extreme, that relationship degrades and flips so that people who think they know more actually know less.
Yes, it is clear there are 'retards' in every group..i am, i just didn't expect these opinions to be irrational and disgusting at the same time. I've seen people here say "retards" (yes, using this word) are going to hell because their is no excuse for not believing in god. What is that? Then when you try to ask for an intelligent reason why this god is a loving father and just judge in their eyes they go "well, if you knew the truth about christ..." or "who are you to judge God.. our minds are finite".
It's the only naturalistic theory.
Speak for yourself.Well, if there are no competing scientific theories, then we should certainly have a lot of confidence in our extremely successful one.
Next question:
Can you please list several “anti-science” views?
Speak for yourself.
I'm not a naturalist.
When will you understand the difference between the observable and the historic, between physics and origins?Do you object to the naturalistic theory that explains and predicts orbital motions in the solar system?
Yes, some are.Vaccines are harmful
When will you understand the difference between the observable and the historic, between physics and origins?
You're smarter than this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?