• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Paul Ryan, Enemy of the Middle Class?

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Here's an opinion piece from earlier this year that will bring those of you who weren't aware of Rep Paul Ryan's (current House Budget Committee Chairman) "plan."

Paul Ryan's budget blueprint: Pushing the aged into poverty - Los Angeles Times

The hall of mirrors in which our bitterly partisan politics now play themselves out is a curious place. But even by its distorted standards, the reaction to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan's budget blueprint has been odd, particularly the general reluctance to call it what it plainly is: an attempt to abolish Medicare and gut Medicaid, while further lowering the taxes paid by corporations and wealthy individuals.
Economists already are picking over the plan's dubious statistics, but — as The Times reported Friday — the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has outlined what adoption of this proposal to supplant Medicare with vouchers and private insurance exchanges would mean. The overall cost of healthcare would go up, and retirees' out-of-pocket medical expenses would double — an increase that would push tens of millions of people living on fixed incomes over the financial brink.

Privatizing Medicare is only the beginning. I am sure that privatizing Social Security will be revisited. I am sure we have the brothers Koch and other wealthy conservative campaign contributors to thank for the continued push to privatize.
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Paul Ryan’s Influence on the G.O.P. : The New Yorker

To envisage what Republicans would do if they win in November, the person to understand is not necessarily Romney, who has been a policy cipher all his public life. The person to understand is Paul Ryan.

As we have already seen in this thread, that is not good news. The article is 7 pages long, if anyone needs to catch themselves up.




 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I found a bit of truth in your link

Quoting from the link

"We're now getting this class warfare that pits people against each other," Ryan said. "[The President] is going from town to town, impugning the motives of Republicans, setting up straw men and scapegoats, and engaging in intellectually lazy arguments, as he tries to build support for punitive tax hikes on job creators."

And it's not just Obama
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Let's get something straight -- regardless of what Grover Norquist says, going back to Clinton rates doesn't raise taxes -- it simply corrects them. The Bush tax cuts were supposed to be temporary and not permanent, but oh how soon we forget!
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
This:

It's been called "hot-spotting". Focus resources at the core of the problem - the same tactic has been used in law enforcement, to positive effect:

John Jay College - The Center on Crime Prevention and Control

and:

ttp://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/11/29/hot-spotting-big-city-crime-spending-less-and-getting-more/

It's a more efficient use of resources, and though the method may include higher expenses initially, they tend to be lower cost long term.

But wholesale slashing by contrast tends to exacerbate existing problems.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Let's get something straight -- regardless of what Grover Norquist says, going back to Clinton rates doesn't raise taxes -- it simply corrects them. The Bush tax cuts were supposed to be temporary and not permanent, but oh how soon we forget!
Interesting isn't that he only wants to correct taxes on certain people? Interesting indeed
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Interesting isn't that he only wants to correct taxes on certain people? Interesting indeed



It amazes me how people who know better (GOP members of Congress) continue to spew this garbage!

Mr. Mach, the reason for letting the upper brackets expire first, is that we are still in a recession, and if you let the middle and lower brackets expire at the same time, the economy will slow, because the middle and lower brackets have a higher multiplier (the reduction in their spending if you take disposable income away from them). Economists know this, the GOP in Congress certainly knows this, and pretends they don't, because they know YOU don't know it.

Obama isn't playing class warfare -- he is using fiscal policy the way it is supposed to be used. The GOP, on the other hand, is pandering to politics instead of what is best for our economy, which would be to let the upper brackets expire first. Their spending won't change if you charge them a little more, because they have more disposable income than they know what to do with (a lower multiplier). Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest

If the Eurozone didn't know it before, they certainly must have guessed it by now ...
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In other words, we should punish success.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,969.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
In other words, we should punish success.

How are they being punished. If I make more money, I make more money, even if a greater % goes to taxes. Oh noes, I can't buy another island and a yacht. Whatever shall I do.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How are they being punished. If I make more money, I make more money, even if a greater % goes to taxes. Oh noes, I can't buy another island and a yacht. Whatever shall I do.
That works all the way down the line.

Example:

I make more money than that homeless guy even if a greater % goes to taxes.. Oh noes, I can't buy the latest smartphone.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
In other words, we should punish success.

Being able to make a sizeable contribution used to be a matter of civic pride -
at least in the birthplace of democracy.

It's not a matter of punishment, but that our country needs tax revenues.

The problem of wealth disparity in this country is not a "liberal" observation; it's a fact and a problem:

America's Descent into Poverty ~ Paul Craig Roberts - PaulCraigRoberts.org

There are a growing number of people in this country for whom an increase in taxes (and for some for whom a decrease in assistance) would push them over the edge.
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In other words, we should punish success.



How do you get this statement, from what I was saying about fiscal policy?! I just explained the mechanics -- it has to do with who has the disposable income (to spare), and the state of our economy at the moment. Applying fiscal policy to the situation would mean that when the Bush tax cuts expire (as they are supposed to anyway), you let the upper brackets expire first. Soon all of us will be back to Clinton rates (the Bush rates have to expire - remember?), but for now President Obama wants to phase in the expiration of the upper brackets first.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You explained the mechanics as you understand them. It isn't up to the government to judge people based on their disposable income.

Let me once again explain the Obama federal income tax philosophy which apparently he shares with a large number of our liberal friends:

We can't allow those citizens who pay no tax to bear the burden of those who don't pay their fair share
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
OK, folks, let's discuss. Is Paul Ryan (and with him the GOP) declaring war on the middle class? Why or why not?


It hurts to see such hate from my fellow believers on the opposite side of the political aisle.
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It hurts to see such hate from my fellow believers on the opposite side of the political aisle.

You have to admit that what we are saying is true. And we call them by their names, and not "that Bozo" or something. You have to give us that.
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
You have to admit that what we are saying is true. And we call them by their names, and not "that Bozo" or something. You have to give us that.

So you admit to hating them? Interesting.
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
We do?????

Yes, if you have kept up with what the GOP members of Congress have been voting for, or at the very least, reading your daily local newspaper.

But if not, then perhaps you wouldn't want to acknowledge it. Go to Congress.org and look up your US GOP House and Senate representation, and see what they've been voting for. I already know, because I subscribe to their "Megavote" newsletter that tells me whenever my people have voted for or against something. It is very informative and you will finally know exactly who your representation is helping, and who they are not helping.
 
Upvote 0

Assuredcw

Citizen for Civil Public Discourse
Oct 16, 2011
2,077
30
✟25,000.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So you admit to hating them? Interesting.

No, I don't admit to it, and I don't think any of the other posters are guilty, either. Proof: we (civilly) refer to them by their actual names, and of course are only describing what they are actually voting for (and against) in Congress.

The proof is always in their voting records.
 
Upvote 0