How is the system-working-as-it-is-designed-to-work=“attacking our Constitution”?Everyone involved, ever D.A., every judge that is attacking our Constitution, that has violated the law, needs to be held accountable. That is how it should be.
A jury of peers does not mean a jury of Joe Biden supporters. Nor is a biased judge supposed to try a case. Nor should the defendant be banned from speaking. Manufacturing a felony charge derived from a misdemeanor charge where the statute of limitations has run out in order to get one man is mocking our law. All of the taxpayer money improperly used for political reasons is to tie up Trump and get him convicted of something before the election even though such a conviction will be overturned. A lot of Americans see this as cheating in an election, election interference.How is the system-working-as-it-is-designed-to-work=“attacking our Constitution”?
What makes you think everyone on the jury supports President Biden? Voie dire, remember?A jury of peers does not mean a jury of Joe Biden supporters.
No indication of bias has been shown. Sure, some assume it...but they're gonna, no matter what. If you want to recuse a judge, you have to show actual bias, not just assume it.Nor is a biased judge supposed to try a case.
Considering Trump has already made public, derogatory, even defamatory statements about potential witnesses, a limited gag order seems wise. Especially since his followers have shown they're more than willing to threaten those potential witnesses on his behalf.Nor should the defendant be banned from speaking.
Those "lot of Americans" haven't seen the evidence the prosecution has. Nor would they be convinced by it, even if they did. Their minds are made up already.Manufactured a felony charge derived from a misdemeanor charge where the statute of limitations has run out in order to get one man is mocking our law. All of the taxpayer money improperly used for political reasons is to tie up Trump and get him convicted of something before the election even though such a conviction will be overturned. A lot of Americans see this as cheating in an election, election interference.
You avoided the manufactured charges. Criminal charges in four jurisdictions at once against the leading candidate for president in election season. That's an attack against our democratic elections and an attack against our Republic. The people have a duty to not allow this to continue.What makes you think everyone on the jury supports President Biden? Voie dire, remember?
No indication of bias has been shown. Sure, some assume it...but they're gonna, no matter what. If you want to recuse a judge, you have to show actual bias, not just assume it.
Considering Trump has already made public, derogatory, even defamatory statements about potential witnesses, a limited gag order seems wise. Especially since his followers have shown they're more than willing to threaten those potential witnesses on his behalf.
Those "lot of Americans" haven't seen the evidence the prosecution has. Nor would they be convinced by it, even if they did. Their minds are made up already.
They'd all be disqualified as jurors during voie dire for cause.
It all boils down to this: Is Trump above the law? Clearly, you believe he is.
Some of us disagree.
-- A2SG, we'll have to see how the jury decides, once they've seen the evidence......
Whether or not the charges are valid will be determined by the evidence. Clearly, that evidence was sufficient to indict, so the validity of the charges must not be as obvious to the rest of the judicial system, including those with experience in NY law, as they are to you.You avoided the manufactured charges.
Apparently, we've not see a presidential candidate who has skirted the law as much as Trump has. He already has a couple of guilty verdicts under his belt so far, we'll have to see if there are any more.Criminal charges in four jurisdictions at once against the leading candidate for president in election season.
The judicial system functioning as it's supposed to is not an attack against the republic. It's how it's supposed to work. Just let the system do it's job, and we'll see how it turns out.That's an attack against our democratic elections and an attack against our Republic. The people have a duty to not allow this to continue.
Good to know that if you were called to be on the jury then you'd have excused yourself.A jury of peers does not mean a jury of Joe Biden supporters. Nor is a biased judge supposed to try a case. Nor should the defendant be banned from speaking. Manufacturing a felony charge derived from a misdemeanor charge where the statute of limitations has run out in order to get one man is mocking our law. All of the taxpayer money improperly used for political reasons is to tie up Trump and get him convicted of something before the election even though such a conviction will be overturned. A lot of Americans see this as cheating in an election, election interference.
Keep complaining about how unfair the Justice system is to a rich man, I’m sure there will be plenty of people who agree with you.A jury of peers does not mean a jury of Joe Biden supporters. Nor is a biased judge supposed to try a case. Nor should the defendant be banned from speaking. Manufacturing a felony charge derived from a misdemeanor charge where the statute of limitations has run out in order to get one man is mocking our law. All of the taxpayer money improperly used for political reasons is to tie up Trump and get him convicted of something before the election even though such a conviction will be overturned. A lot of Americans see this as cheating in an election, election interference.
He's the leading presidential candidate of the people of the United States, and the people are mostly low income or middle class. It is improper to violate someone's Constitutional rights based upon how successful they are in business or because of their politics.Keep complaining about how unfair the Justice system is to a rich man, I’m sure there will be plenty of people who agree with you.
He's the leading presidential candidate of the people of the United States, and the people are mostly low income or middle class. It is improper to violate someone's Constitutional rights based upon how successful they are in business or because of their politics.
Those who have violated our Constitution are the ones who need to "own it." A defendant has every right to speak, officers of the court have no right to attack Trump or violate his rights.It was his choice to run.
Republican primary voters had other choices. They chose the candidate with multiple charges against him in multiple courts. Own it.
As a defendant, you don't have any right to attack or otherwise try intimidating a jury or any officer of the court.
Those who have violated our Constitution are the ones who need to "own it." A defendant has every right to speak, officers of the court have no right to attack Trump or violate his rights.
Are gag orders a violation of the Constitution? They can be but when applied correctly to a particular instance they are not.Those who have violated our Constitution are the ones who need to "own it." A defendant has every right to speak, officers of the court have no right to attack Trump or violate his rights.
Gag orders on defendants are extremely rare. This is because according to the U.S. Constitution there is a presumption of innocence and the Bill of Rights is very much about protecting the rights of a defendant. So too they are making an exception for Trump to have the time to examine the massive amount of evidentiary records provided--the judge is not granting Trump enough time. This almost never happens to a defendant. Likewise Trump's attorneys are not able to give fair representation because they are simultaneously hitting Trump with four trials in four distinct jurisdictions. Also most judges would have recused to prevent even a suggestion of lack of impartiality. All of this means the cases will eventually be thrown out on appeal, but the idea is to tie Trump up so Biden, who's campaign has been funded by wealthy donors, can dominate in campaigning and Trump can also be called a convicted criminal. Any way they can prevent a fair election process, whether by keeping Trump off of the ballot, by violating his rights under the Constitution, by preventing proper identification of voters, or by exploiting weaknesses in the chain of custody of ballots is fair game to the hard left.Are gag orders a violation of the Constitution? They can be but when applied correctly to a particular instance they are not.
Yes, poorest most persecuted man ever, our man of perpetual victimhood.Gag orders on defendants are extremely rare. This is because according to the U.S. Constitution there is a presumption of innocence and the Bill of Rights is very much about protecting the rights of a defendant. So too they are making an exception for Trump to have the time to examine the massive amount of evidentiary records provided--the judge is not granting Trump enough time. This almost never happens to a defendant. Likewise Trump's attorneys are not able to give fair representation because they are simultaneously hitting Trump with four trials in four distinct jurisdictions. Also most judges would have recused to prevent even a suggestion of lack of impartiality. All of this means the cases will eventually be thrown out on appeal, but the idea is to tie Trump up so Biden, who's campaign has been funded by wealthy donors, can dominate in campaigning and Trump can also be called a convicted criminal. Any way they can cheat in an election, by keeping Trump off of the ballot, by violating his rights under the Constitution, by preventing proper identification of voters, or by exploiting weaknesses in the chain of custody of ballots is fair game to the hard left.
Most people dont even know what the alleged crime is.Yet, a cloud of doubt hangs over all the proceedings. Only about 3 in 10 Americans feel that any of the prosecutors who have brought charges against Trump are treating the former president fairly.....
This take is so hot you could use it to smelt iron ore.He's the leading presidential candidate of the people of the United States, and the people are mostly low income or middle class. It is improper to violate someone's Constitutional rights based upon how successful they are in business or because of their politics.
Your response sounds like a Trump interview.Gag orders on defendants are extremely rare. This is because according to the U.S. Constitution there is a presumption of innocence and the Bill of Rights is very much about protecting the rights of a defendant. So too they are making an exception for Trump to have the time to examine the massive amount of evidentiary records provided--the judge is not granting Trump enough time. This almost never happens to a defendant. Likewise Trump's attorneys are not able to give fair representation because they are simultaneously hitting Trump with four trials in four distinct jurisdictions. Also most judges would have recused to prevent even a suggestion of lack of impartiality. All of this means the cases will eventually be thrown out on appeal, but the idea is to tie Trump up so Biden, who's campaign has been funded by wealthy donors, can dominate in campaigning and Trump can also be called a convicted criminal. Any way they can prevent a fair election process, whether by keeping Trump off of the ballot, by violating his rights under the Constitution, by preventing proper identification of voters, or by exploiting weaknesses in the chain of custody of ballots is fair game to the hard left.
Gag orders have nothing to do with guilt or innocence. They're rare because the government tries to avoid being in the business of limiting speech. At the same time, it can be necessary to do so if someone's speech is threatening the validity of the trial (like, for instance, encouraging people to attack or threaten participants in the trial).Gag orders on defendants are extremely rare. This is because according to the U.S. Constitution there is a presumption of innocence and the Bill of Rights is very much about protecting the rights of a defendant.
Trump and his lawyers have delayed his trials for years. They've had plenty of time to review the evidence.So too they are making an exception for Trump to have the time to examine the massive amount of evidentiary records provided--the judge is not granting Trump enough time. This almost never happens to a defendant.
That does tend to happen when you keep delaying your trials. They have to happen eventually, and the longer you delay, the more likely it becomes that they'll all happen at about the same time.Likewise Trump's attorneys are not able to give fair representation because they are simultaneously hitting Trump with four trials in four distinct jurisdictions.
Why would you think that most judges would have a suggestion of impartiality?Also most judges would have recused to prevent even a suggestion of lack of impartiality.
Yes, yes, it's all a big conspiracy by the "hard left." One they've somehow managed to keep anyone from spilling the beans on for almost a decade now. Color me skeptical.All of this means the cases will eventually be thrown out on appeal, but the idea is to tie Trump up so Biden, who's campaign has been funded by wealthy donors, can dominate in campaigning and Trump can also be called a convicted criminal. Any way they can prevent a fair election process, whether by keeping Trump off of the ballot, by violating his rights under the Constitution, by preventing proper identification of voters, or by exploiting weaknesses in the chain of custody of ballots is fair game to the hard left.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?