- Jan 29, 2017
- 12,920
- 13,373
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Fact is, the notion of a link has widely become unpopular so we will never get the connection affirmed scientifically.
Hummm?
No, evolution, for the sake of Darwinism.You asserted that science is keeping something under wraps for the sake of Darwinism.
Evolution tells us we come from apes. God did not breathe into the nostrils of apes. It is flawed from start.
I believe we were speaking about" primate to man " not all fossils.To elaborate on Speedwell's comment, transitional fossils exist. Based on the definition of a transitional fossil (e.g. a fossil that contains intermediary characteristics between two or more taxa), such fossils have been found. There is no dispute over that fact.
Those claiming such fossils do not exist are typically professional creationist organizations. And naturally it is in their interest to not provide correct information about the scientific support for evolution, including transitional fossils.
In fact, the only way to suggest that transitional fossils don't exist is to dispute the existence of the fossils themselves. But that just seems silly.
Hard to understand that question, because man is a species of primate. Do you mean, how man became differentiated from the other primates, that transition?I believe we were speaking about" primate to man " not all fossils.
I believe we were speaking about" primate to man " not all fossils.
AgreedScience makes no claims about any gods at all, nor whether they have a creepy habit of breathing into the nostrils of apes.
[Simple comparative anatomy shows that there are no groupings of apes that excludes us but places the rest into a group.]
[Simple comparative anatomy shows that there are no groupings of apes that excludes us but places the rest into a group.]
And I am saying humans are not primates in other words , not an animal. This is why Darwinian evolution is flawed from the start.Hard to understand that question, because man is a species of primate. Do you mean, how man became differentiated from the other primates, that transition?
And I am saying humans are not primates in other words , not an animal. This is why Darwinian evolution is flawed from the start.
Of course that is possible. It is also possible that the toaster didn't toast my bread this morning, but that God took the fresh piece of bread out of the toaster and replaced it with an already toasted piece while my back was turned making tea.That's the most interesting thing to me about creationist claims that humans were a uniquely created species. If we're supposed to be so unique, why do we share most characteristics with other species?
If I may interject in your conversation, scripture tells us we are all made from the " dust of the earth". This has been uncovered by science, we can agree on that. Where the division comes in is the " kind" of that creation from dust. Scripture tells us all creation is made " after it's own kind". This is why animals do not mate out of their own kind and humans do not mate out of their own kind. Even though our DNA is so " close " to certain primates, it is yet so far from theThat's the most interesting thing to me about creationist claims that humans were a uniquely created species. If we're supposed to be so unique, why do we share most characteristics with other species?
If I may interject in your conversation, scripture tells us we are all made from the " dust of the earth". This has been uncovered by science, we can agree on that. Where the division comes in is the " kind" of that creation from dust. Scripture tells us all creation is made " after it's own kind". This is why animals do not mate out of their own kind and humans do not mate out of their own kind. Even though our DNA is so " close " to certain primates, it is yet so far from the
" same kind". So strictly speaking science with no intelligent design , evolution is flawed. Offspring can not be produced out side of our kind.
That's the most interesting thing to me about creationist claims that humans were a uniquely created species. If we're supposed to be so unique, why do we share most characteristics with other species?
It's our spirits that are unique. That is what is meant by the breathing of life into Adam.
These fragmented remains are an incomplete jigsaw which is why it keeps changing. The human genome of the homo sapiens sapiens remains unique and science keeps pointing to this fact.There are numerous hominid transitional fossils.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?