- Dec 27, 2018
- 1,126
- 400
- 33
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
To be fair to God, we couldn't know if/how he does if he did because he exists outside of our reasoning.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
To be fair to God, we couldn't know if/how he does if he did because he exists outside of our reasoning.From a Christian perspective it is surely true that God intervenes to lessen evil.
This is a fair explanation.If you'd like to save yourself a headache or two, forget the "God does not interfere in people's free will" answer to the problem of evil. It's something of a catch-all or cop-out answer some people give when they don't have an answer to the question.
That being said, we do not know if or when God "interferes" with a person's free will or when He doesn't. The bible is filled with examples of God doing just that. We see murders committed every day and ask why God didn't move to stop them. But we do not know how many murders God did in fact stop. So to answer your question, we do not know. And since we don't know, we may well have a nice world to live in because it would that much worse without it.
That just makes it sound like God is using something he hates as a useful idiot of sorts just to fulfill his own agenda and only because he wants to show everyone how awesome he is. It is what would be called narcissist if a man did that.—Or maybe God intended it, so that he could redeem us and demonstrate his justice, power, wisdom, mercy and love?
Which is why he is God. It's quite a different thing from man.That just makes it sound like God is using something he hates as a useful idiot of sorts just to fulfill his own agenda and only because he wants to show everyone how awesome he is. It is what would be called narcissist if a man did that.
We can be certain that there are not two Gods as some Gnostic beliefs have indicated. How can we be certain? Because there can only be one “omnipotent”, “omniscient”, and “omnipresent” being more than one being with these qualities would be a logical contradiction.I’m not a religious believer. Most religious doctrines (of all world religions—not just Christianity) don’t make logical sense to me. Here’s a question: Other than faith, how can anyone know that God is good? We all observe that both good and evil exist in the world. The kind and compassionate often suffer, while the wicked prosper. Why wouldn’t it be possible that God is dualistic—sometimes benevolent, sometimes malevolent? Or maybe there are 2 God’s—one good, one evil, who are in constant struggle with each other. I know this is unscriptural. But maybe the Biblical depiction of God as inherently good was a product of God’s evil side, and was intended to cause confusion. Other than faith (and I won’t argue with faith) there’s no way to objectively determine anything about God’s moral nature.
And of course, neither can it be unarguably determined that any kind of god or gods even exist.
Why can't 2 equipotent Gods exist? Is that anymore contradictory--or arbitrary--than the single OT God being divided into 3 entities by a committee in the 4th century?We can be certain that there are not two Gods as some Gnostic beliefs have indicated. How can we be certain? Because there can only be one “omnipotent”, “omniscient”, and “omnipresent” being more than one being with these qualities would be a logical contradiction.
God has always existed in three persons and one essence, the Spirit, the Son (Word or Logos), and Father are clearly expressed in the beginning and throughout the entire bible.Why can't 2 equipotent Gods exist? Is that anymore contradictory--or arbitrary--than the single OT God being divided into 3 entities by a committee in the 4th century?
It is more contradictory and more arbitrary. It is simple. This all came from somewhere. God did not "come from" at all. The way I say it is, "It makes more sense that God exists, than that I should exist. Yet, here I am, apparently."Why can't 2 equipotent Gods exist? Is that anymore contradictory--or arbitrary--than the single OT God being divided into 3 entities by a committee in the 4th century?
God has always existed in three persons and one essence, the Spirit, the Son (Word or Logos), and Father are clearly expressed in the beginning and throughout the entire bible.
Your argument is based purely on faith in one particular interpretation of the Bible and religious tradition. And as I said, I won't argue with faith. But can you not think outside the box? Or maybe outside the book?The prologue to the Gospel of John clearly spells that out, please read it and see what you think. It should be obvious that there cannot be two all powerful beings one of them is not all powerful. It is good that you are asking questions, keep asking until you get answers that are acceptable to you.
There is a difference between free will and choice. Adam and Eve were given a choice if they would eat the fruit of the tree of good and evil. We are given many choices in life and there is clearly a right and a wrong choice.That being said, we do not know if or when God "interferes" with a person's free will or when He doesn't.
There is a difference between free will and choice. Adam and Eve were given a choice if they would eat the fruit of the tree of good and evil. We are given many choices in life and there is clearly a right and a wrong choice.
Not to get off topic, but didn't God know that they would disobey? Wasn't this God's will?There is a difference between free will and choice. Adam and Eve were given a choice if they would eat the fruit of the tree of good and evil. We are given many choices in life and there is clearly a right and a wrong choice.
God's plan ESTABLISHES choice, including theirs. But if that isn't free will, then there is no free will of creatures.Not to get off topic, but didn't God know that they would disobey? Wasn't this God's will?
Remember the former things, those of long ago; I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me. I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say, "My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please."
Isaiah 46:9-10:
There was no choice. Adam and Eve's actions were part of God's plan all along.
God's plan ESTABLISHES choice, including theirs. But if that isn't free will, then there is no free will of creatures.
Nothing in the Bible suggests that God wants us to disobey him. I know what Calvan and Joseph Smith teach on this and I do not agree with them. God can know the future, but He can also choose not to know. Just like we are told He will remember our sins no more.There was no choice. Adam and Eve's actions were part of God's plan all along.
How is that a design flaw? What do you think God is doing?But it seems like a bit of a cop-out to then blame humanity for what is in essence a design flaw on God's part. Theists argue that God in His divine wisdom granted us humans free will, and it's we humans who through our prideful exercise thereof who are to blame for all of the world's sin and debauchery, not God.
But this would be like Google creating an AI that chose to destroy humanity, and then having the head of Google place the blame for that destruction on the AI instead of on the people who designed the AI. At least the head of Google would have ignorance as an excuse, God can claim no such defense.
Are you suggesting that when it comes to designing an intelligent being God can do no better than Google? (Although the jury is still out on Google's efforts)
"Wants"? What do we know of what God wants, but his commandments? His plans, however, that is a whole different thing. No need to want something there —that IS going to happen. Don't look at him like he's one of us. He isn't.Nothing in the Bible suggests that God wants us to disobey him. I know what Calvan and Joseph Smith teach on this and I do not agree with them. God can know the future, but He can also choose not to know. Just like we are told He will remember our sins no more.
Absolutely EVERY thing that comes to pass, does so by causation, either directly or indirectly, from First Cause.
Life is full of surprises.But this is true regardless of whether there's a God or not, so why propose the existence of something for which there is no need? Why not simply refer to it as the First Cause and leave it at that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?