Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
1. What is "nature"?
2. What is "natural" about "nature"?
Everything that could, in principle, be observed (directly or indirectly).1. What is "nature"?
What is watery about water?2. What is "natural" about "nature"?
No, you do not know, you cannot know.No, I mean i'm not sure.
According to whom?Their is a very compelling hypothesis about how life begin in the volcanic sea vents.
Again, according to whom?I know it because simply by virtue of being the best explanation.
Creation doesn't contradict any "areas of science" that I am aware of.Unless you can offer a better explanation that doesn't contradict all the other areas of science, like say creationism.
And you would know that how?But about knowing... i cant KNOW that I am not the only self aware life form. Is that what you mean. If we really want to be stingy about the word know, one really doesn't know anything,...
I disagree.... especially anything about God.
Evidence for molecules to man evolution? There is none, and before you go citing sources to scientific evidence of (what evo fundies like to call) microevolution, dont bother, I call it variation, it's scientific and contradicts nothing in scripture.However their is very strong evidence evolution happened
The "evidence for creation" is universal....and explains the diversity of life. Their is no evidence for creationism.
A naturalistic explanation for the origin of nature is what I was looking for. That you lot haven't got one is your problem not mine. and where did I "plead for a special exception"?You demand justification for the existence of the universe, and yet you plead for a special exception in your justification? Epic fail.
I like asking questions.If you're going to stop asking questions, why not stop at "the universe exists?"
Is this what atheists believe?Aha! I smell, once again, the opportunity for a joke at someone else's expense!JK, I hope you'll take this in humor. I've posted it before.
Theist: What created the universe?
Atheist: Nothing. It's always been there.
Theist: Nonsense! Everything needs a cause, universe included. That First Cause is God!
Atheist: Ok, what caused God?
Theist: Nothing. He's always been there.
Atheist:
Is this what atheists believe?
Some do. Some don't. Atheism is not a position on the origin of the universe, so there is no reason to think there is a unanimous opinion. It is nonbelief in the existence of deities, nothing more.Is this what atheists believe?
1. What is "nature"?
2. What is "natural" about "nature"?
Apparently not enough to question where God came from...A naturalistic explanation for the origin of nature is what I was looking for. That you lot haven't got one is your problem not mine. and where did I "plead for a special exception"?I like asking questions.
Evidence for molecules to man evolution? There is none, and before you go citing sources to scientific evidence of (what evo fundies like to call) microevolution, dont bother, I call it variation, it's scientific and contradicts nothing in scripture.
Would you have me believe that what we observe - variations - given enough time can take, for example, a cat and produce something other than a cat?
Here it is evos: If you want proof of evolution, the kind that would convince even the likes of me that our having evolved was a serious possibility, then youre going to have to stop looking to the past and start looking to the future, cat to not a cat..... Lights! Camera! action!..... Film it.....
Here it is evos: If you want proof of evolution, the kind that would convince even the likes of me that our having evolved was a serious possibility, then youre going to have to stop looking to the past and start looking to the future, cat to not a cat..... Lights! Camera! action!..... Film it.....
The "evidence for creation" is universal.
Yes it does. Specifically, young earth creationism denies all or part of:Creation doesn't contradict any "areas of science" that I am aware of.
Could you explain how YEC denies mathematics, sociology, pharmacology, and electronics? I can see how the others must be denied, but not these four.Yes it does. Specifically, young earth creationism denies all or part of:
Geology
-including Plate Tectonnics
Astronomy
Mathematics
Meteorology
Biology
Genetics
Paleontology
Botany
Geography
Physics
-including Atomic Physics
-including Electronics and Electricity
Taxonomy
Linguistics
Sociology
Pharmacology
Archaeology
And not to be left out, the written record of history
I'm sure I've missed some, as well.
I will happily explain the presence any given category upon request.
I suspect that refers to the "pi" agrument. The bible seems to imply that pi = 3.Could you explain how YEC denies mathematics,
Probably that man can only be moral with threat of damnation from God.sociology,
Well... that one is based on medical knowledge, and the Bible says that thought and emotion occurs in the heart, rather than the brain. Not sure if that is what sbvera13 was referring to, though.pharmacology,
and electronics? I can see how the others must be denied, but not these four.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?