Hans Blaster
I march with Sherman
- Mar 11, 2017
- 22,731
- 16,997
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
I have zero use for that book, unless there is a bug to smash.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Scientists are morons when it comes to the Bible -- absolute clueless morons.
Thanks for the QED.I have zero use for that book, unless there is a bug to smash.
As the great Roman philosopher Simplicus Flimflammus once said "It takes one to know one".Scientists are morons when it comes to the Bible -- absolute clueless morons.
Yup -- eyes barn ignit, eyes die ignit.As the great Roman philosopher Simplicus Flimflammus once said "It takes one to know one".
Scientists are morons when it comes to the Bible -- absolute clueless morons.
Neat.But they ARE experts when it comes to the particular area of reality that they are experts on.
Equally relevant we can thank Mark Siddall for his research into hippopotamus butt leaches.Neat.
Johnny can do handstands and adjust his center of gravity to maintain inverted positions for thirty seconds or more.
But can he spell?
No, let's not ignore it. I'd like you to rebut it. If you can't, you owe me an apology.Lets disregard the fact that your answer is false, which shows a woeful lack of research.
Asserted without evidence. Nice start.When where and what all documented forensically, several repeats.
You don't meet your own standards for others, but you win hands down? Lol, you're funny.Lets just compare with evidence for abiogenesis. You do not know whether it happened at all ,even once let alone several times, , where even which planet it happened on , when (to the nearest billion years), or even what actually happened, when if you say what happened happend, that your really dont seem to know what happened.. Nobody saw it. There is no evidence of the first cell. There is nothing to analyse. There is not even a model for the first self evolving self replicating cell (aka life) the precursors for that step (aka no life). ie not even a valid hypothesis.
So evidence stakes,
I win hands down. You have nothing at all! Even high priest Dawkins of the faith says he has no idea...listen to your priest, you are off message!
Neat.
Johnny can do handstands and adjust his center of gravity to maintain inverted positions for thirty seconds or more.
But can he spell?
Then do it, if you can.
I've given challenge after challenge and encouraged people to use that science knowledge of theirs to impress the living halo out of me.
But instead, they prefer to mock, ridicule, make fun, and scratch themselves to death trying to figure them out.
So be it.
Speaking of tarring, the Bible's claims are a real pain in science's side, aren't they?You've given a challenge that doesn't make sense. The Lost Tribes is your wheelhouse: it's a Biblical claim.
Why should science (since you still seem to just love to tar every thing with the same brush) try and validate something you believe in?
Speaking of tarring, the Bible's claims are a real pain in science's side, aren't they?
Because they have a rich history of sticking their noses in areas they don't belong, and making judgement calls that are lies, untruths, and erroneous speculations.Why should science (since you still seem to just love to tar every thing with the same brush) try and validate something you believe in?
Because they have a rich history of sticking their noses in areas they don't belong, and making judgement calls that are lies, untruths, and erroneous speculations.
That's why you'll find their advice to us, stuff like:
- pray to a milk carton, it's just as effective
- give up on the idea of a global Flood
- put stock in the Scopes Monkey Trial
- keep the Ten Commandments off of public property
- shack up, if you want to, just be aware of STDs
- hug your trees
- smoke dope, and drink alcohol, as long as it's in moderation
- other junk they can use to dilute the Bible
Because they have a rich history of sticking their noses in areas they don't belong, and making judgement calls that are lies, untruths, and erroneous speculations.
That's why you'll find their advice to us, stuff like:
- pray to a milk carton, it's just as effective
- give up on the idea of a global Flood
- put stock in the Scopes Monkey Trial
- keep the Ten Commandments off of public property
- shack up, if you want to, just be aware of STDs
- hug your trees
- smoke dope, and drink alcohol, as long as it's in moderation
- other junk they can use to dilute the Bible
Thanks for the advice, but science certainly comes to the rescue of someone having cognitive dissonance against clear-cut issues in the Bible.In summary, please stop blaming all of the things you don't like to "science" especially when most of these things aren't related to actions of science. It makes you look the fool.
Thanks for the advice, but science certainly comes to the rescue of someone having cognitive dissonance against clear-cut issues in the Bible.
Do you think, for example, that Roe v Wade would have gotten passed, had not science plutoed "child in the womb" to "fetus"?
So!?AV, I've told you before that fetus has been used to refer to a child in the womb for centuries before Roe vs Wade was even a sparkle of an idea.
So!?
Of course it would.
I'll ask again:
Would Roe v Wade have gotten passed, had not science [centuries ago] plutoed "child in the womb" to "fetus"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?