Tropical Wilds
Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
- Oct 2, 2009
- 6,733
- 4,839
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is that like The Wizard of Oz?Have you been to the Great Physician?
Yes, I did tell people that if they use my pens, they need put them where they belonged, including turquoise green. And if they didn’t, yes, I would say “please put my stuff back where it belongs if you’re taking it out…” If they kept putting it with the green pens, I’d keep telling them “ok, it doesn’t go there anymore, it goes with the blue pens. With the greens there now, which are mostly yellow green, and this is a more blueish green, it makes more sense that it goes with the blue.”Between these two sentences, did you teach that your turquoise green pen belonged in with the green pens?
And if you tested anyone on it, did you mark any answer wrong that said otherwise?
In addition, how would you mark any answer that says it goes in with the green pens today?
Is that like The Wizard of Oz?
Yes, I did tell people that if they use my pens, they need put them where they belonged, including turquoise green.
Pretty sure I can’t go to Jesus for an eyeglass prescription.I'll take that as a "No."
Pretty sure I can’t go to Jesus for an eyeglass prescription.
Or, more likely, I owned 14 and then I acquired 146 more.So, in looking back over the period between those two sentences, you thought you had 14 brushes at first when, in reality, there were 140 brushes?
Can we say your decimal point was off by one place?
I’m not sure you know what the point you’re trying to make is.And you can't go to the Wizard of Oz for eternal life.
Or, more likely, I owned 14 and then I acquired 146 more.
I’m not sure you know what the point you’re trying to make is.
Our solar system? No.So, in Pluto's case, are you saying that, after 1930, our solar system acquired more planets, causing Pluto to have to be demoted?
Some of us aren’t so excited to cast of the shackles of being well educated as others, I suppose.It's simple:
Science can take a hike.
Our solar system? No.
Other systems? Yes.
Since 1990, we’ve found 5,700+ of them, actually.
Some of us aren’t so excited to cast of the shackles of being well educated as others, I suppose.
I suppose that means math is out too, since they’re entirely linked and inseparable.
Can’t say I’m mad about that one, though.
Well it does, you just don’t like that it does and cannot refute that it does, lol.Then your analogy doesn't apply.
Rare omission of not being well informed on your part, but ok.No argument there.
LoL, what? Seriously? Math is math, my guy.If math contradicts the Bible, math can take a hike.
I find it fascinating how hard some people will work to be utterly wrong at really basic things and decide the solution isn’t to make themselves more knowledgeable but to demand everybody around them be stupid.One poster here uses math as a poster child for the Bible being wrong, based on the Bible [allegedly] saying Pi is 3.0.
Based off of that information, the logical answer would be 1, unless you’re not sequencing, then the answer would be 0 or undefined. More information is needed, which means that when it is discovered, we will have a new and more correct answer.Want some math?
7/7 = 1
3/3 = 1
0/0 = what?
LoL, what? Seriously? Math is math, my guy.
See, I haven’t caught this show yet, this is new information to me, lol.It's not even if the Bible is contradicted. It's only if HIS interpretation of the Bible is contradicted, then 'science can take a hike'.
See, I haven’t caught this show yet, this is new information to me, lol.
I have explained already that in 1930 and for 60 years after that it was reasonable to classify Pluto as a planet. It is in orbit around the Sun, and it is large enough to be spherical. During the period from 1930 to 1992, Pluto was the only known extra-Neptunian object, so the question whether it had cleared its orbit did not arise. It was only when many more extra-Neptunian objects were discovered that it became necessary to define a new class of objects (dwarf planets) among those that move in heliocentric orbits.Pluto is an example of inaccurate scientific information.
Else it would not have been classified as our 9th planet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?