PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Sure I could, I could, were I god, create an orange without DNA that was still edible, a rock without crystalline structure or pattern, an omnipotent being can literally do anything.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can you create a rock with no prior history?
Can you create a rose or an orange with no prior history?
I do believe the correct answer is no, as those would not then be rocks, roses and oranges as all of those would have apparent "history" if created from nothing in a fraction of a second.
I am mad. I did not finish the reading ...
When did I say I gave them false information?
You do understand it was an analogy to how God gives us false information by making the universe appear to be much older than it really is, yes?
Sure I could, I could, were I god, create an orange without DNA that was still edible, a rock without crystalline structure or pattern, an omnipotent being can literally do anything.
Besides this, an orange without DNA would not be an orange. Same for the rock.
That's what they assume based on today's rates, yes. It's not a fact and is in dispute.
You are forgetting the other aspects of the God of the bible. Besides this, an orange without DNA would not be an orange. Same for the rock.
I understand. But you used a WRONG analogy. I (God) did not give false information to my students (people).
The millions of years of age is NOT a false information.
In what way is making the universe look billions of years older than it actually is NOT false?
Because it sure sounds false to me!
Even we do not know why, but we do know the radiometric dating gives the right order to sequential events. The number is only a label. It is real, but it may not indicate the true time.
It is not as simple as counting the years.
Who says? If God made an orange without DNA, who are you to say it's not an orange?
Even we do not know why, but we do know the radiometric dating gives the right order to sequential events. The number is only a label. It is real, but it may not indicate the true time.
It is not as simple as counting the years.
Why not?
Because we do not know what is time yet.
Are you seriously trying to tell us clocks don't work because we don't know what time is, yet?
This is not an argument, this is word play.
It works at our scale. But behaves strangely at some special scales.
It is very similar to that we do not see God, so we say God does not exist.
Time works strangely at different scales?
First, translate into English. Second, provide supporting scientific evidence.
In what way is making the universe look billions of years older than it actually is NOT false?
Because it sure sounds false to me!
If the universe were made to be only 6000 years old, it would not function.
Just as making Adam a recently born baby, would result in a dead Adam in a few days.
How do you know you aren't really looking at a 6000 year old, created universe?
Time works strangely at different scales?
First, translate into English. Second, provide supporting scientific evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?