Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Anoetos, I assure you, that if you believe such things I will not be angry with you. I would ask that you rephrase such beliefs so that they do not bear any resemblance of attacking, because some may take it as such, not recognizing that you are voicing your beliefs in the way you see it appropriate.telling the world the deep truth that we are all sinners in need of a savior, and that the grace by which he saves us is free, never gets old and that is the primary business of the church.
this is what i was referring to when i said your church doesn't do it.
your "gospel" is not free.
i am sorry to have to tell you this, and i fully expect to be reported to the mods for "being mean" or something, but i can't help it; your "gospel" has works, done by you, added to what Christ has done. and this probably explains your church's excellence in doing good deeds: it is trying to earn a wage.
ours does not. ours is biblical. yours is not.
it follows then, that we, as church are doing and being what Jesus intended.
you are not.
Tada,
Your church does a lot of good works.
I am not sure what an "invisible church onlyist" is, but my guess is that you mean "Protestant".
I will admit that you have a point. We do generally lag behind your church in the doing of good deeds.
But this begs the question, what is the purpose of the church? The Church, mind you, not individual Christians, or even Christians acting together. I am not entirely certain that the Church has, as it's primary duty, the doing of good deeds, the feeding of the hungry, clothing of the naked, etc.
Of course, Christians should do these things, but ISTM that the primary purpose of the church is to be the means by which sinners are brought into a saving relationship with Christ. The good things that Christians are to do they do having been prepared in the church to do them.
So then, I see the primary purpose of the church to be the preaching of the Gospel and the equipping of the saints. We do this. Your church does not, for all it's good deeds.
II. The visible Church, which is also catholic or universal under the Gospel (not confined to one nation, as before under the law), consists of all those throughout the world that profess the true religion;[2] and of their children:[3] and is the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ,[4] the house and family of God,[5] out of which there is no ordinary possibility of salvation.[6]
IV. This catholic Church has been sometimes more, sometimes less visible.[8] And particular Churches, which are members thereof, are more or less pure, according as the doctrine of the Gospel is taught and embraced, ordinances administered, and public worship performed more or less purely in them.[9]
There is no big problem Anoetos.A discussion of merit is far afield here and I refer having taken us to it. I also am sorry if anyone perceives my remarks as "attacking". They were prompted by tada's characterization of "invisible church onlyists" as persons who do not, generally, participate in good works.
Anoetos, I assure you that the Catholic Church teaches that all good fruits are of the Spirit. It is the Spirit which motivates us to do the good works, and when they are done, we have truly performed the works, although they proceeded from the Spirit of God. In this way, while we acknowledge that God renders to every man according to his deeds (Romans 2), we also acknowledge that we truly plant, and truly water, yet God yields the increase. Ultimately, God receives glory for enabling us to such work. For what would such fruits be without the Spirit of God coaxing them out of us?Besides the fact that there is no such thing as an "invisible church onlyist" and beside the fact that we do, in fact, perform a great many good deeds, I merely wanted to outline why I think it is that your church places such a high premium on them. You see your good works as central to your salvation, a part of the Gospel, for all intents and purposes. We don't, and neither does the Bible.
We see them as fruit and outworking of what God has done in us. They are uncoerced acts of love that flow from hearts set free. I hear you saying that you believe the same when you say that they are fruits of the spirit, but really, how can that be so when you believe they have salvific merit? You do them for a wage, whether you attribute them to the movements of your own will or the work of the Spirit in you, it is you who take the credit and the benefits you perceive as accruing to them. It is you who receive glory for them.
Not so with us.
There is no big problem Anoetos.
Anoetos, I assure you that the Catholic Church teaches that all good fruits are of the Spirit. It is the Spirit which motivates us to do the good works, and when they are done, we have truly performed the works, although they proceeded from the Spirit of God. In this way, while we acknowledge that God renders to every man according to his deeds (Romans 2), we also acknowledge that we truly plant, and truly water, yet God yields the increase. Ultimately, God receives glory for enabling us to such work. For what would such fruits be without the Spirit of God coaxing them out of us?
I encourage you to examine the fifteenth chapter of John. Jesus is the True Vine, and his Father is the husbandman. Branches are cut out based on whether they bear fruit or not, and those which do bear fruit are pruned of the bad so that they may bear more good fruit. However, the branches which are not cut off and thrown into the fire are only able to grow their fruit because they abide in Christ; it is Christ which allows the branch to grow the fruit. Nonetheless, the Father judges the branches, not the Vine, based on their fruit.
I'm sorry, but I do not understand how my views are at variance with the Catechism. You state: "it simply becomes nonsensical because no good works, or merit, is needed for salvation." I do not see how this logically follows. Merit is always needed for salvation. All of our merits, including those of the Virgin Mary and the Saints, have proceeded from the grace of God, the charity of Christ.Unfortunately, your views are at variance with the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I will provide one example to start -
1477 "This treasury includes as well the prayers and good works of the Blessed Virgin Mary. They are truly immense, unfathomable, and even pristine in their value before God. In the treasury, too, are the prayers and good works of all the saints, all those who have followed in the footsteps of Christ the Lord and by his grace have made their lives holy and carried out the mission in the unity of the Mystical Body."
This is from a discussion concerning the Treasury of Merit. The basic concept is that Merit (which includes those things listed above) can be transferred by the Church to individuals to aid in their personal salvation and to assist in reducing the torment of Purgatory. If you apply your concept of good works to the concept of the Treasury of Merit, it simply becomes nonsensical because no good works, or merit, is needed for salvation.
Merit of any sort is invisible, is it not?By the way, the Treasury of Merit is utterly and completely invisible.
Well, Paul plants, Apollos waters, but God gives the increase. God has chosen to associate men with his work of grace. Paul wrote to Timothy, saying that if Timothy continued in the doctrine, he would save himself and them that heard him. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God, which is preached by men. In this way men are associated with salvation, yet it is truly the grace of God.Why would you need merit other than or beyond that of Christ?
Of course, you will tell us that all merit, even that of Mary and the saints stems from Him, but this is a convenient fiction, a way of whistling past the theological graveyard, as it were: you don't take credit but you get it.
I'm sorry, but I do not understand how my views are at variance with the Catechism. You state: "it simply becomes nonsensical because no good works, or merit, is needed for salvation." I do not see how this logically follows. Merit is always needed for salvation. All of our merits, including those of the Virgin Mary and the Saints, have proceeded from the grace of God, the charity of Christ.
Merit of any sort is invisible, is it not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?