You pick.
Today, tomorrow, next week, last week, whatever lets you answer it to the best of your comfort level.
Ok.. yesterday, then.
Did.
Hmmm ... and what makes you select ex nihilo over ex materia?
You selected ex nihilo in your question.
This in no way has anything to do with my challenge.
Sure it does. For god to create something, there has to first be a god to do it.
Go right ahead and tell me what you think that fingerprint should be.
There are so many different religions and beliefs about god, I wouldn't know which example to pick... And since there's never been any evidence of any god anywhere, that puts an even bigger wall in the way.
That's your job -- to give us enough evidence as to know what really transpired.
As someone pointed out, the lack of craters on a moon the same composition and in a similar orbit to our moon would indicate a very young moon, but as for evidence of it being created ex nihilo, there wouldn't be any.
Here, I'll make one up: The moon is made of a hard plastic, has green cheese at its core, and has a sticker on it that says MADE IN JAPAN.
I'll take anything -- just please answer the challenge and don't yak it to death.
Thank you --
We already know that you suggest that since there
can't be evidence of creation, that it must have happened. Unfortunately, that's a fallacy. Otherwise the argument that you're swimming in an ocean of plaid cotton candy with spiders made of lollipops that you can't see, touch, taste, hear, or smell would also be true.
The reason we know creation didn't happen the way the bible says is
because there's no evidence for it, and additionally all evidence is against the biblical creation.
Now, how about you answer this question: Why would God make the universe in a form completely contradictory to the words of the bible?