• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Delphiki

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2010
4,342
162
Ohio
✟5,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.

What evidence would you present that He did this?

When? Like today or tomorrow? I think the fact that there wasn't a moon immediately before, then there one being there would be self evident that a moon appeared ex nihilo... But if God doesn't show him/her/itself in the process in any way, then it's not evidence of a god -- only that a moon appeared for no apparent reason or cause. To have evidence that he did it, we'd have to see him doing it, or be already familiar with some sort of physical evidence of God existing so that some sort of fingerprint would be left behind.

Since the scenario you give already relies on a bunch of other impossibilities in order to take place, it's really hard to say anything else.

Not to mention, a moon being spontaneously created right here and now wouldn't necessarily be ex nihilo.

If you're trying to get a response from scientifically-minded individuals, all I can say is, you'll need a lot more detail for your scenario, as scientists will generally keep digging into more specifics of the evidence until an explanation begins to develop.



@LHM - People writing about vampires that sparkle in the sun instead of bursting into flames is positive evidence that there is no god.
 
Reactions: Orogeny
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,699
15,166
Seattle
✟1,175,210.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.

What evidence would you present that He did this?


Other then pointing out the new moon suddenly orbiting the planet when there was not one there before?
 
Upvote 0

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.

What evidence would you present that He did this?
It would depend. Is the moon identical to our moon? I.e. showing evidence of impacts and ground moon dust, indicating that it has been there for quite some time, and possibly formed in a collision?

If so, then you are just making an argument form special pleading. Yes, if you insert an infinitely powerful God into the equation, then any evidence that we would see could be fabricated. However, that raises the following questions:

1. Why did God seek to deliberately mislead us? (i.e. 6,000 year old earth)
2. What reason do you have to posit a God?
 
Upvote 0

VehementiDominus

Active Member
May 12, 2011
307
13
England
✟520.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
God creates another moon -- ex nihilo -- orbiting the earth.

What evidence would you present that He did this?

I wouldn't present any evidence that he did this.

If a new moon appeared out of nowhere, I'd examine the evidence and draw conclusions from that. I'm not going to start with the preconcieved conclusion that "Goddidit!", am I? No, the conclusion is drawn from the evidence, not vice versa.

Your premise goes off the assumption that God does exist. It's nonsensical. It doesn't mean anything.

I could ask the exact same for Allah or Quetzalcoatl. It's literally meaningless.

Tell you what, pray reeeeeeeally ard and get your God to make this extra moon. Of course, you'll have to ask him to keep the tides working properly. When this extra moon appears we'll examine the evidence, ok?

Though, something tells me, every Christian in the world could spend 24 hours a day praying for this new moon and nothing would happen. Except maybe a lot of Christians starve to death through deciding to pray for a new moon rather than eat. Actually, if everyone in the world prayed, whether they were Christian or not, to God to create this extra moon, I'm still pretty certain nothing would happen.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
When? Like today or tomorrow?
You pick.

Today, tomorrow, next week, last week, whatever lets you answer it to the best of your comfort level.

Just answer it, please.
I think the fact that there wasn't a moon immediately before, then there one being there would be self evident that a moon appeared ex nihilo...
Hmmm ... and what makes you select ex nihilo over ex materia?
But if God doesn't show him/her/itself in the process in any way, then it's not evidence of a god -- only that a moon appeared for no apparent reason or cause.
This in no way has anything to do with my challenge.
To have evidence that he did it, we'd have to see him doing it, or be already familiar with some sort of physical evidence of God existing so that some sort of fingerprint would be left behind.
Go right ahead and tell me what you think that fingerprint should be.
Since the scenario you give already relies on a bunch of other impossibilities in order to take place, it's really hard to say anything else.
Go ahead and try -- give it your best educated guess.
Not to mention, a moon being spontaneously created right here and now wouldn't necessarily be ex nihilo.
That's your job -- to give us enough evidence as to know what really transpired.
Help yourself -- I'm easy.

Here, I'll make one up: The moon is made of a hard plastic, has green cheese at its core, and has a sticker on it that says MADE IN JAPAN.

I'll take anything -- just please answer the challenge and don't yak it to death.

Thank you --
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It would depend.
I disagree.
Is the moon identical to our moon?
If you want it to be.
I.e. showing evidence of impacts and ground moon dust, indicating that it has been there for quite some time, and possibly formed in a collision?
If you want it to be.

It can even have the June Taylor Dancers dancing on it, if you want.

Please, just answer it though -- (I think another poster is depending on it).
If so, then you are just making an argument form special pleading.
Nope -- just putting forth a very simple challenge, as prompted to do so in another thread.
Yes, if you insert an infinitely powerful God into the equation, then any evidence that we would see could be fabricated.
Forget fabrication -- that would render this challenge moot.

Let's assume it really happened.
However, that raises the following questions:

1. Why did God seek to deliberately mislead us? (i.e. 6,000 year old earth)
2. What reason do you have to posit a God?
These have NOTHING to do with this challenge.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I wouldn't present any evidence that he did this.
Because you would withhold the evidence; or because you don't have any?

I suspect the latter, but feel free to show me wrong.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thank you -- as they say in Spanish: es sobre tiempo.

(I would hope that Einstein would disagree with you though; albeit on a technicality that has to do with the Laws of Thermodynamics and omniscience.)

I -- personally -- agree with you: none.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
61
✟176,857.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Thank you -- as they say in Spanish: es sobre tiempo.

(I would hope that Einstein would disagree with you though; albeit on a technicality that has to do with the Laws of Thermodynamics and omniscience.)

I -- personally -- agree with you: none.
You do realize that's a really reason to not believe god did it.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
the TRUTH that there is no evidence for creationism. Your special pleading is going to make that lack of evidence anything more then a lack of evidence.

Your question is flawed because you do not know what properties a god created moon might have so there may very well be an answer to this question that one can discern from a real god created moon, but since you cant answer any specifics about this moon, the question goes nowhere.

Its a Dud.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
the TRUTH that there is no evidence for creationism.
There is and there isn't.

As far as you are concerned, there isn't any -- (albeit, I'm open to surprises).

From an omniscient perspective, the amount of total energy in the universe would increase in accordance with the appearance of the new moon.
Your special pleading is going to make that lack of evidence anything more then a lack of evidence.
No special pleading involved -- there is no discernable evidence that you guys can come up with; albeit, as I said, I could be wrong.
No -- it's you that can't answer -- not I.

QV the OP
 
Upvote 0

Delphiki

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2010
4,342
162
Ohio
✟5,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
You pick.

Today, tomorrow, next week, last week, whatever lets you answer it to the best of your comfort level.

Ok.. yesterday, then.

Just answer it, please.

Did.

Hmmm ... and what makes you select ex nihilo over ex materia?

You selected ex nihilo in your question.

This in no way has anything to do with my challenge.
Sure it does. For god to create something, there has to first be a god to do it.

Go right ahead and tell me what you think that fingerprint should be.



There are so many different religions and beliefs about god, I wouldn't know which example to pick... And since there's never been any evidence of any god anywhere, that puts an even bigger wall in the way.

That's your job -- to give us enough evidence as to know what really transpired.

As someone pointed out, the lack of craters on a moon the same composition and in a similar orbit to our moon would indicate a very young moon, but as for evidence of it being created ex nihilo, there wouldn't be any.

Here, I'll make one up: The moon is made of a hard plastic, has green cheese at its core, and has a sticker on it that says MADE IN JAPAN.

I'll take anything -- just please answer the challenge and don't yak it to death.

Thank you --

We already know that you suggest that since there can't be evidence of creation, that it must have happened. Unfortunately, that's a fallacy. Otherwise the argument that you're swimming in an ocean of plaid cotton candy with spiders made of lollipops that you can't see, touch, taste, hear, or smell would also be true.

The reason we know creation didn't happen the way the bible says is because there's no evidence for it, and additionally all evidence is against the biblical creation.

Now, how about you answer this question: Why would God make the universe in a form completely contradictory to the words of the bible?
 
Upvote 0

VehementiDominus

Active Member
May 12, 2011
307
13
England
✟520.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Because you would withhold the evidence; or because you don't have any?

I suspect the latter, but feel free to show me wrong.

Because I wouldn't have any.

Neither would I have the conclusion that Goddidit, to start off with. That's how Bibles get written. Y'know, when people make stuff up and claim it as inerrant "Truth", without verifying any of it?

Then a load of gulliable, easily-bluffed people believe it without question just because it says it's "Truth".

What evidence would I have available?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,937
52,601
Guam
✟5,141,563.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0