Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm all energy myself.Okay ... so man consists of mass and energy.
Anything else, according to applied science?
In other words, is there a third ingredient? fourth? fifth?
You look like it.I'm all energy myself.
Intermixed is "time". Such ingredients changing over time.Okay ... so man consists of mass and energy.
Anything else, according to applied science?
In other words, is there a third ingredient? fourth? fifth?
The other is man is triune- with a body, a soul, and a spirit.Intermixed is "time". Such ingredients changing over time.
Citation? Or is this opinion?The other is man is triune- with a body, a soul, and a spirit.
Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.Citation? Or is this opinion?
so, a Scientific Citation is more than a claim. It's generally a link to the research paper, methodologies of the study and any datasets used to derive a conclusion. Your unsubstantiated claim doesn't even have an established author, let alone the rest of what is required of a scientific citation.Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
1 Thessalonians 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus
Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Only insofar as it has something to cite.so, a Scientific Citation is more than a claim.
Groovy.Bugeyedcreepy said:It's generally a link to the research paper, methodologies of the study and any datasets used to derive a conclusion.
From a scientific perspective, I take it?Bugeyedcreepy said:Your unsubstantiated claim doesn't even have an established author,
Science is myopic.Bugeyecreepy said:... let alone the rest of what is required of a scientific citation.
Like evidence and research you acknowledged with:Only insofar as it has something to cite.
Groovy.
Correct, You care about believing true things and avoiding false things, right?From a scientific perspective, I take it?
a paint brush is myopic. In fact, many tools and toolsets I use are myopic. That's a good thing.Science is myopic.
Yes.Like evidence and research you acknowledged with:
Your version of "true" is different from mine.Bugeyedcreepy said:Correct, You care about believing true things and avoiding false things, right?
Yup.Bugeyedcreepy said:a paint brush is myopic.
Yup.Bugeyedcreepy said:In fact, many tools and toolsets I use are myopic.
Cool, nice of you to acknowledge.Yes.
No, True is True regardless. There is no such thing as "versions" of true.Your version of "true" is different from mine.
A definition is not "True", it's a Definition. Nothing about Pluto changed when the definition was tightened to exclude Pluto, and the other 1800 or so objects that we've since found that match Pluto's conditions. We have definitions to make things clear, would you rather we remember 1800-ish solar objects that are synonymous with attributes identical to Pluto? Or like you and your religion, just arbitrarily and subjectively decide with no real guidance what is and isn't a planet in the Solar System?Your version of "true" would say Pluto was our 9th planet from 1930-2006.
and certainly shouldn't find a monumental amount of evidence that disproves any "creation week" either.Yup.
It can't paint on an easel that was never made.
Just like science shouldn't be demanding evidence of a week full of miracles that didn't generate any.
Religion though, that's a presupposition of all presuppositions that in some cases dangerously interferes with reality.Yup.
Hammers were made for nails; screwdrivers were made for screws; monkey wr... skip that one; saws were made for wood; and so on was made for etc.
In that case, from 1930-2006 you were wrong.No, True is True regardless. There is no such thing as "versions" of true.
Did you even bother to read his response. A definition can change over time, yet that change has no bearing on the actual object in question.In that case, from 1930-2006 you were wrong..
Furthermore, you were wrong and didn't know it.
And you didn't know it, because you didn't have tools powerful enough to catch it.
And you praised yourselves in 1930 for something that was labeled wrong.
And you sent a message out into space in 1974 from Aricebo with the wrong information on it, because it was based on mislabeling a planet that wasn't a planet like the rest.
And Thalidomide was mislabeled too, wasn't it?
And the Challenger blew up because you were wrong too.
In that case, from 1930-2006 you were wrong.
Furthermore, you were wrong and didn't know it.
And you didn't know it, because you didn't have tools powerful enough to catch it.
And you praised yourselves in 1930 for something that was labeled wrong.
And you sent a message out into space in 1974 from Aricebo with the wrong information on it, because it was based on mislabeling a planet that wasn't a planet like the rest.
.....what? ......just, what??And Thalidomide was mislabeled too, wasn't it?
And the Challenger blew up because you were wrong too.
Okay ... so man consists of mass and energy.
Anything else, according to applied science?
In other words, is there a third ingredient? fourth? fifth?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?