Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Right here it is:Your question was really not a question.
Are you so committed to disagreeing with me it blinds you to basic grammar?Got any polls that show that 'many' people think that way?
No one is trying to use the fact that you share a common ancestor with chimpanzees to prove anything. Where did you get that idea from?
There are polls available on line, I think the main website is called pewforum if you're interested.
I apologise if I read too much into your post but I got the impression that you were implying that there were reasons for rejecting the TOE that aren't based on religion, a view I would strongly disagree with.
I suppose by philosophy you mean atheism. But the theory of evolution does not "prove" atheism and everybody knows it; it merely offers no objection to it, any more than it does to theism.
Right here it is:
Are you so committed to disagreeing with me it blinds you to basic grammar?
That was a sincere question from my part btw.
That statement is exactly my point. What makes you think thats a fact and not an opinion?
see this thread:
Darwinian Theator of the Mind: AKA Human Brain Evolution
Scofield beat me to it: The gospels with respect to the resurrection.Well, you've got two Gospels that say he wasn't there, and two that say he was. Combine those.
Scofield beat me to it: The gospels with respect to the resurrection.
It's no wonder some people are atheists, isn't it?He is rather awkwardly trying to get the gospels to agree. He really does not succeed.
You have that backward as usual AV.It's no wonder some people are atheists, isn't it?
Not to mention the different accounts of the Nativity between Luke and Matthew - probably written for different audiences rather than any desire for consistency...He is rather awkwardly trying to get the gospels to agree. He really does not succeed. Some more points:
"The different accounts of the resurrection are full of contradictions like this. They can’t even agree on whether Jesus was crucified on the day before Passover (John) or the day after (the other three)..."
Regarding Christianity "the vast majority" of people in the world are atheists.It's no wonder some people are atheists, isn't it?
Serious question:Regarding Christianity "the vast majority" of people in the world are atheists.
And that was a rather foolish demand that Jimmy D showed to be wrong. And you are not being honest. I asked you about the second part of your post. Here is your post in its entirety:
"
Got any polls that show that 'many' people think that way?
Anyway, if you make the point the Bible is inaccurate, so what's it to you some people reject a scientific theory on flawed philosophical ground?"
No, you made a ridiculous demand. Jimmy answered it for you. If you did not understand his answer you should have asked for a clarification. I asked you about the second part of your post. If you need clarification on how Jimmy showed you to be wrong we could discuss that too.
It didn't look that way. In fact it was not a "sincere question". You used a false dichotomy. You should try again.
No need to take a detour quite yet. You really don't seem to have a point.
Don't know don't care, not relevant.Serious question:
Would you happen to know if the vast majority of atheists in the world consider themselves "Homo sapiens"?
I'm assuming they do.
I agree, it's like asking you why you are a Christian?Well, I admit I can't make any sense of that post. Perhaps if you stopped assigning motives or leaping to conclusions you wouldn't think asking a question for clarification a "ridiculous demand".
Well, I admit I can't make any sense of that post. Perhaps if you stopped assigning motives or leaping to conclusions you wouldn't think asking a question for clarification a "ridiculous demand".
Maybe you should at least consider it then.Don't know don't care, not relevant.
Maybe you should at least consider it then.
You show me an atheist, and I'll show you someone who thinks he's a Homo sapiens.
Just as Paul warns.
Just like he didn't warn the priests to abandon their jobs, right?NO, Paul did not make that warning.
Just like he didn't warn the priests to abandon their jobs, right?
My life verse is Galatians 3:26.
Did Paul write it?
Why should I consider a myth? do you give other myths any consideration?Maybe you should at least consider it then.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?