Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you know, Rick, that I went through 12 years of education, then two more years of college, and not once did I see a peer-reviewed article?
I don't even know what one looks like, or how they come about.
Then you show up demanding peer-reviewed articles from us.
I consider that a form of bullying.
Ain't that a shame?The existence and reaction to this thread does pose the question of why there is no original research being presented and this has the clear implication that Creation Science is not actually a working science.
Business AdministrationWhat did you study at college (just for my own curiosity)?
I am not criticizing that.Do you know, Rick, that I went through 12 years of education, then two more years of college, and not once did I see a peer-reviewed article?
That is the purpose of this thread, to educate those who don't understand what original research is and what the criteria is for passing peer review demands in the physical sciences.I don't even know what one looks like, or how they come about.
Asking for supporting evidence for a claim made in a post is bullying? Wow! Just wow. Then I suggest you to report me to the moderators along with everyone else who also asks for supporting evidence and links to it.Then you show up demanding peer-reviewed articles from us.
I consider that a form of bullying.
So, if you cannot tell me what evidence would convince you, how is it possible to present evidence to you at all?That question is impossible to answer, because I've never been presented with a god-model sufficiently detailed wich could be validated by evidence.
That's kind of the problem with such unfalsifiable, vague, abstract concepts.
And that's talking about some generic "god" entity.
When going into specific religions, like christianity, we can consider the stories and test them against reality to see if they hold up. And i'm afraid they don't. Adam and eve, Noah and the flood, etc.... Those are a done deal. They are definatly false stories and thus not accurate portrayels of earth's or humanity's history.
Allow me to turn your question around though....
What evidence (or lack thereof) would convince you that what you believe, is actually false?
There never will be "poofing out of thin air" in biology. It happened once and now there is no more need of it.There is no "poofing out of thin air" in biology.
But there is in ex-nihilo creationism.
There's a case to be made that this kind of passive-aggressive self-victimization is a form of bullying in its own right, but I've encountered worse examples on these forums. It's best ignored.Asking for supporting evidence for a claim made in a post is bullying? Wow! Just wow. Then I suggest you to report me to the moderators along with everyone else who also asks for supporting evidence and links to it.
So, if you cannot tell me what evidence would convince you, how is it possible to present evidence to you at all?
There never will be "poofing out of thin air" in biology. It happened once and now there is no more need of it.
God took six days to "poof" everything into existence that is needed to exist. And, He saw that it was good and rested.
Then the rule under the Formal Debating Rules, "3. Proper citations must be given." is bullying? Houston, we have a problem.There's a case to be made that this kind of passive-aggressive self-victimization is a form of bullying in its own right, but I've encountered worse examples on these forums. It's best ignored.
There never will be "poofing out of thin air" in biology. It happened once and now there is no more need of it.
God took six days to "poof" everything into existence that is needed to exist. And, He saw that it was good and rested.
So, if you cannot tell me what evidence would convince you, how is it possible to present evidence to you at all?
You don't even know yourself, what is sufficient. How are we to, then, present such evidence.
It is an unattainable quest. You make us jump and jump higher and higher. All the time you have no intention of ever being satisfied. Or better still if you can even be satisfied or by what you would be satisfied.
DogmaHunter needs to learn the difference between creatio ex nihilo and creatio ex materia.There never will be "poofing out of thin air" in biology. It happened once and now there is no more need of it.
God took six days to "poof" everything into existence that is needed to exist. And, He saw that it was good and rested.
And I always found it rather funny that an all-powerfull being required "rest".
If they can't get creatio ex nihilo down, how are they going to get all that other stuff down?Wouldn't it be more descriptive if you called it creatio ex nihilo anticus materia?
I would think you would, for one.Who cares, really?
Indeed, it's absurd; this may not be a formal debating forum, but requesting a citation to support an assertion is par for the course in a science forum.Then the rule under the Formal Debating Rules, "3. Proper citations must be given." is bullying? Houston, we have a problem.
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/formal-debating-rules.2911417/
Yeah, but other than internet forumz, this is meaningless drivel. Those of us who value reality can't be bothered to understand trivial, convoluted myths to satisfy personal egos.I would think you would, for one.
That way, you wouldn't make mistakes like this:
"There is no "poofing out of thin air" in biology.
But there is in ex-nihilo creationism."
Now, I'll admit, there is no "proofing out of thin air" in biology; and there is in ex nihilo creationism; but I don't think that's what the poster meant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?