If evolution were false we would find fossils of both flora and fauna in all layers of sedimentary strata. The fact is, we don't. In fact we find them exactly how they would be expected to support evolution.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The fossil record never supported Darwin theory since his tree of life is upside down and the fossil record is stasis. So I totally disagree and see the fossil is good evidence against evolution.
You were there?The resurrection story was not in the original writings of Mark it was added hundeds of years later so there was definitely no witnesses,
What 500?not only that, does anyone think that 500 people rising up from the dead walking about would not cause someone to write the event down?
How do you know it wasn't written down?or did that kind of thing happen every week then?
No, in truth, some will assume what didn't happen, forgetting that God preserves what He wants written down and leaves the rest to Mother Nature to disintegrate.In truth though believers are not really interested in what did happened or what didn't happen because true or false they will believe what they want to believe anyway.
What if they found something according to their testimony that hasn't evolve in 2 billion years?If evolution were false we would find fossils of both flora and fauna in all layers of sedimentary strata. The fact is, we don't. In fact we find them exactly how they would be expected to support evolution.
Just because someone totally disagree with your view doesn't prove that person doesn't understand. It seem you have a strong bias against anyone who holds a different view than yours.What are you talking about? Clearly you have no understanding of the fossil record. You have to stop reading the garbage at lying creationist sites.
In fact you probably need to learn what scientific evidence is. Then you would not make such an obvious mistake.
You don't need to be there (you can see it today)... believe it or not the oldest manuscript of Mark does not have the resurrection in it.You were there?
Yours is not a view it's a belief.It seem you have a strong bias against anyone who holds a different view than yours.
People do not 'believe' in evolution they accept it.Worldview and beliefs are basically the same thing.
That's because the common people never used them; thus they didn't fall apart with use.You don't need to be there (you can see it today)...
Most of the Doctor Who original copies from the 60's was destroyed. So they had to get copies from other countries but a few of them have scenes that was edited out. So they tried to restore as best they could back those missing scenes . This is an example of the oldest copy doesn't mean it's closer to the original.That's because the common people never used them; thus they didn't fall apart with use.
The common people used the true word of God.
That may be, but it has been shown time after time that sites like Answers In Genesis and ICR are ready to lie for Jesus. Holding those groups in contempt is not bias since they have earned it. I hope you are aware that both of those sites require their workers to abandon the scientific method if they want to work there.Just because someone totally disagree with your view doesn't prove that person doesn't understand. It seem you have a strong bias against anyone who holds a different view than yours.
As it apparently happened after the supposed ascension, what exactly do you think they saw that they forgot to write down?Watch out as that's a double edge sword you have there. I wouldn't want you to cut yourself.
Newton's mechanics still works for day to day situations, even though it is wrong. Geosynclinal concepts of miogeosynclines and eugeosynclines still help understand plate tectonic data.Old technology is replace with new technology yet the old technology still works.
This sentence tells me that you have no accurate understanding of how science works.The more science is based on human opinion the more it has to changes when discovering new facts.
Well, that's odd. Even as an undergraduate geologist I routinely tested the past in the field and in the laboratory.Science can not test the past only the present.
You are on the jury in a trial of a murder. Evidence is presented where in your opinion the defendant is guilty then suddenly one piece of evidence turn the4 tables and you realize the defendant was framed. Evidence doesn't interpret itself which is why the court has juries. The evidence is not what changed.
How life diversified deals with the past without any eyewitnesses so you only got revelation or speculation.
Even forensic science needs eye witness of a crime.
The same in a courtroom where the jury heard the testimony of 500 eyewitnesses.
What if you were one of the 500?If they didn't give conflicting testimony I would be tempted to believe in miracles.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?