Yes please do. If the issue is an interpretation of evidence then the creationist must have an explanation, a possible falsification, and lots of evidence. I'll be waiting in the wings.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All right. Please outline your theory of how life diversified, the falsification criteria, and what evidence there is for this.
That sounds like a cop out. Technology is simply applied science and if you think technology works from the outset then you do not live in the real world. Technology is subject to exactly the same kind of necessary revision as science and for the same reason: new evidence and improved interpretations of existing evidence.Technology works while science is constantly has to be corrected because it's based on human opinion.
Old technology is replace with new technology yet the old technology still works. The more science is based on human opinion the more it has to changes when discovering new facts. Science can not test the past only the present. Historical science is like a hot air balloon , it's a butch of hot air held together with a thin layer of facts.That sounds like a cop out. Technology is simply applied science and if you think technology works from the outset then you do not live in the real world. Technology is subject to exactly the same kind of necessary revision as science and for the same reason: new evidence and improved interpretations of existing evidence.
If you seriously believe that science is based on opinion, then you have failed to study the matter with any level of seriousness. You owe it to yourself to do so, sooner rather than later.
Lol, eyewitness testimony is your only benchmark for what happened before today? That's quite good coming from someone whose whole belief system revolves around a story without any eyewitness testimony.How life diversified deals with the past without any eyewitnesses so you only got revelation or speculation.
And then there's this little thing called hard evidence...How life diversified deals with the past without any eyewitnesses so you only got revelation or speculation.
We do have eyewitness testimony that Jesus Christ raised from the dead and their testimony impacted the world.Lol, eyewitness testimony is your only benchmark for what happened before today? That's quite good coming from someone whose whole belief system revolves around a story without any eyewitness testimony.
No, you don't.We do have eyewitness testimony that Jesus Christ raised from the dead and their testimony impacted the world.
Ok. Would you like to demonstrate how all hard evidence in favor of evolutionary radiation has been misinterpreted by coincidence?Hard evidence still need to be interpreted. you could have hard evidence you are guilty of a murder but it only take a little evidence to reveal you were set up.
I disagree with your worldview that the evidence fix evolution. (plus that get to the heart of the matter , man's evolution.) I see the emperor naked.Ok. Would you like to demonstrate how all hard evidence in favor of evolutionary radiation has been misinterpreted by coincidence?
Those are not eyewitness testimonies.Yes we do , It written down and again it made a huge impact to the world.
How life diversified deals with the past without any eyewitnesses so you only got revelation or speculation.
We do have eyewitness testimony that Jesus Christ raised from the dead and their testimony impacted the world.
So no reliable account of the supposed 500 witnesses. Paul was not a witness himself.Paul wrote there were over 500 witnesses including disciples.
Strange then that none of them wrote down what they saw.Paul wrote there were over 500 witnesses including disciples.
Sure is, isn't it?Strange then that none of them wrote down what they saw.
Did this story of appearing to 500 happen before or after the story of the ascension?Sure is, isn't it?
Amid severe persecution, where they went door-to-door searching for Christians ...
Acts 8:3 As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.
... everyone had Jesus' resurrection written in their diaries, didn't they?
The answer is in my post.Did this story of appearing to 500 happen before or after the story of the ascension?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?