Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So [true] science is either supported hypotheses, insofar as it's not?
There's no such dichotomy as proven/unproven?
Instead, it's supported/unproven?
Sceince is the only religion I know that runs on a network of supported guesswork.
Has there ever been a time in the past, where a gue... er... hypoth... er... theory has been "proven" false, then later shown to be supportable?
Should I have said, "assumption"?Except that you used the word "guesswork" there, Poe.
And they feed us just enough "discoveries" to make us look like their craft is legitimate.Reasonable scientists know that the "missing link" is a headline catching pipe dream.
You should refrain from discussing that which you time and time again demonstrate little to no knowledge of. You should visit the theology section more often than not.Should I have said, "assumption"?
(After all, you know what they say about "assume" --- don't you?)
And they feed us just enough "discoveries" to make us look like their craft is legitimate.
After all, they don't want to lose any support.
At least S.E.T.I. was honest enough not to start "finding things" out there when their support came into question.
You're the one not answering my questions.You should refrain from discussing that which you time and time again demonstrate little to no knowledge of. You should visit the theology section more often than not.
Meanwhile --- back to the subject at hand...Now for honest support you cant beat forced tithes, and execution for those who dont believe.
Honest? Here's a book. Its not based on anything but some visions but its all true and if you dont believe it you will go to hell.
Legit? Faith man, faith! If you dont have faith you will go to hell.
I think you're unreasonable. I think that this may or may not be a significant find, but also that regardless it does not 'show us' the mechanics of macro-evolution... Which is the most... awesomely intriguing part of the theory. I've wondered if such macro-evolution and rapid revolution was brought on by hostile and deadly periods in history, such as magnetic pole shifts, solar flares, high relatively corrosive gas in the atmosphere, high amounts of UV radiation, etc...And they feed us just enough "discoveries" to make us look like their craft is legitimate.
After all, they don't want to lose any support.
At least S.E.T.I. was honest enough not to start "finding things" out there when their support came into question.
Conspiracy theories not withstanding.And they feed us just enough "discoveries" to make us look like their craft is legitimate.
After all, they don't want to lose any support.
At least S.E.T.I. was honest enough not to start "finding things" out there when their support came into question.
WOW --- you want "hostile and deadly periods in history" to have occurred so as macroevolution can function?I think you're unreasonable. I think that this may or may not be a significant find, but also that regardless it does not 'show us' the mechanics of macro-evolution... Which is the most... awesomely intriguing part of the theory. I've wondered if such macro-evolution and rapid revolution was brought on by hostile and deadly periods in history, such as magnetic pole shifts, solar flares, high relatively corrosive gas in the atmosphere, high amounts of UV radiation, etc...
I'd be let down if macro-evolution wasn't behind it. I think macro-evolution builds up awe in the Creation without limiting God at all. That is, the wonder involved clearly points to the existence of a Creator.
Our origins are thoroughly Documented and preserved in a Book that tells us not only Who did it, but when He did it, how He did it, where He did it, why He did it, what order He did it in, and even who the eyewitnesses were.You don't understand enough of it to challenge it.
We're not a species --- we're a kind --- humankind.
And eventually isn't the word for it --- it was done in a day.It's not hard to believe because you're taking it on faith --- and your evidence is only stuff retro-fitted to look legitimate.
There is no necessity to interpret Genesis as you have.WOW --- you want "hostile and deadly periods in history" to have occurred so as macroevolution can function?
How romantic are you towards this doctrine?
Then, to top that off --- all this death, destruction, and survival points to our Creator???
No, thanks --- I'll stick with the Documentation.
In order for those events to fully align the way they did in the precise order they did is simply not possible by chance. You would have better odds of winning the lottery jackpot....in all 50 states at once.
.
And I'll be glad to repeat myself here --- I am not a Homo sapien.Again you're wrong. We are of the genus homo and the species sapien. Homo sapiens.
And I'll be glad to repeat myself here --- I am not a Homo sapien.
And I'll be glad to repeat myself here --- I am not a Homo sapien.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?