Overview
1) learn how to argue, there are books about it you might of had one your freshman year in enghlish class(thats in HS) i'm beging to wonder if you have graduated that yet even
2) aging no warrant, no reason to prefer
3) no clash, you never address my points you make off the wall statments that have little to nothing to do what i'm saying
4) closed mindness is a good sign of bigtory as a generall rule of thumb
Zaac said:
And you're being treated just like any person who wanted to marry someone of the same sex would be treated.
1) no warrant
2) no reason to prefer, why is that status quo better than what i'm suggesting
3) no clash, this has nothing to do with the nature of homosexuality being a sin
4) feeds orginal point, that the status quo treatment of homosexuals is unfair an un-equatable
Zaac said:
Wrong again. There is no more burden placed upon you than there would be for straight unmarried couples in the same predicament.
1)no reason to prefer
2) no clash
3) feed my unquiness argement and my link to in-equality, you prove the unfair burrend placed on the homosexual couple because you conside the fact that a hetrosexual couple can get married further more at the point where a homosexual couple can't you see the unfair burden placed on the homosexual couple
Zaac said:
What you're proving is that you think I'm a bigot because I disagree with your viewpoint. And by your own definiton, I couldn't possibly be a bigot. You haven't seen me say anything about same-sex couples not being able to get married because I do not like them.
1) no warrant
2) you conside the fact you are closed minded i did not do that for you
3)you attmept to further the status quo which in and of its slef has a discrmatory stance toward the homosexual
4) if you did like them would you let them get married, the answer is obvisluly yes thus proving your dis-like at the very least
Zaac said:
What is with this attempt to present some sort of half-baked legal talk? How is that a violation of equal rights? If no same sex people, straight or homosexual can get married, where is someone being treated unequally?
1) no warrant
2)no reason to perfer
3) its not legal talk when i can prove abuse and all you can do is say no, if you would like to negate the abuse or try to prove me wrong then please do, that was point less of me to say oh yeah, no clash
4) you never tell me what equally means so i have no idea where you are coming from on this one
Zaac said:
You actually haven't said much of anything.
1) i know you haven't said much of anything, its really hard to say anything to you because all you do is say i'm right over and over again using deffer words
2) feeds all my no warrants
3) feeds all my no reasons to prefer
4) heck that really feeds everything i've been saying, becuase you have not expaned on the fact that you agree with Carri on number 4, you might have well of just cut and pasted the comment and just keep hitting control V
Zaac said:
I don't have to provide a definition of equality because ain't nobody been treated unequally.
Gay people can't marry the same sex, and neither can straight people.
1)sure you don't have to proved a counter def, but then don't complain when i use my to referance back to
2) you never show the bias in my def, moreover you never show how my defination hurts any of your points(if you and some that would be good too) or how it hurts and ground that you think you have lost becuase of my def we need def to understand what we are talking about other wise people like you would acctually win arguments and that would be sad.
Zaac said:
That's the way it is with truth. People argue and add to opinions.
1) what are you talking about, i don't even think you know, you don't even know how to construct an argument you just have your opinion and you think your right, you never tell me how you are right, why you are right, just that you are right, that does not work becuase i could say that the world is flat and think i'm right, well you know what i would not be, that is all you are doing, just with people civil right something far more important the the shape of the earth
Zaac said:
If you're not talking about sexual intercourse then stop saying that they can sleep with whomever they want.
As I said, the other sector of society also cannot marry people of the same sex.
1) are you brain dead that is the abuse, that is what is unequal why do you keep help my argument and thinking that you are making a point for your self
2) no warrant
3) no reason to prefer the status quo
4) your above statments condradict each other, if i can sleep with a woman then marry her i should be able to do so with a man, i don't see why that is so hard to understand
Zaac said:
Gosh, you thought I was attempting to argue?
I don't argue about God's Word. As you said earlier , I was very repetitive, as I will always be when it comes to God's Word.
1) no warrant
2) no reason to perfer
3) you talk about God's word but yet you never show me any bible passage that would show me that a Goverment can't allow two people of the same sex to marry if you can do that then you can say you are talking about God's word
4) if you are going to be repetiave you will never win any arugment no matter how right you happen to be
Zaac said:
As far as being closed minded, you finally got something right because my mind is closed to everything that runs against God's Word and of this I am not in any manner ashamed.
no wonder you have no idea:
1) that you are losing this argment with not just me but with about 3 other people
2) that you are just perpuating a cycle of hate on the homosexual comunity that is spured on by the religous right