yod said:I saw him today at a conference in California and asked someone to tell me about him.
yod said:He's not jewish...but dresses like the High Priest everywhere he goes.
From what I have learned he exposes the difference between the 'Greek' "Jesus" and the 'Hebrew' "Yeshua". Denying the validity of the commonly known "Jesus". And seems to witness the testimony from a Hebrew context. How is this is denying the deity of Yeshua? It's denying the understanding of the Christian "Jesus". Not Yeshua. When I saw him he quite openly and often proclaimed Yeshua. Just not in the typical Christian way.yod said:He does not believe in the deity of Yeshua.
Portland Or. Double Tree Hotel Banquet Hall, standing room only, did not count would estimate 300 to 400? (ten chairs each side about 20 rows back would equal about 400.Child of the Most High said:What city did you see him in and how many people were there?
shimshon said:One does well to understand the difference between rabbinical, messianic, karaite, zionist Judaism. (if i've left out a sect please forgive)
shimshon said:Being from a certain tribe by heritage means nothing today.
shimshon said:This would only be of consequence today for "Rabbinical" Jews who still see the blessing as coming through "physical" bloodlines. And still see the house of Levi as the qualified cohanim that Elohim works through. And if M. Rood is claiming to be from the tribe of Levi falsely expecting it to make him more 'righteous' in the sight of Elohim then he will have to deal with Elohim for that.
Yet, I do not understand it this way. The way of thinking is more along the lines that we are all cohanim now, all who are children of Elohim are a faithful cohanim to him. A KINGDOM of cohanim to the glory of Elohim. If you need Scriptural context I will provide it.
And YES this message IS an insult to most "Rabbinical" Jews, and Christians. It is foolishness to those who are perishing. He places the low in high places and brings the lofty down to the ground. Rabbinical Jews for the most part find Yeshua an insult, why would they find the True message any less insulting?
Child of the Most High said:I was referring to lineage as prescribed in the Torah, and not by the rules of any sect.
B'resheet 49:10 said:The scepter will not pass from Y'hudah, nor the ruler's staff from between his legs, until he comes to whom [obedience] belongs; and it is he whom the peoples will obey.
1 Samuel 2:35-36 said:35 I will raise up for myself a faithful cohen who will do what I want and what I intend. I will make his family faithful, and he will serve in the presence of my anointed one (HaMoshiach) forever. 36 Everyone left in your family (Mosaic covenant cohenim) will come, prostrate himself before him for a silver coin or a loaf of bread, and say, "Please, won't you give me some work as a cohen, so I can have a scrap of bread to eat?"
Tehillim 78 said::68 he chose the tribe of Y'hudah, Mount Tziyon, which he loved. 69 He built his sanctuary like the heights; like the earth, he made it to last forever. 70 He chose David to be his servant, taking him from the sheep-yards; 71 from tending nursing ewes he brought him to shepherd Ya'akov his people, Isra'el his heritage. 72 With upright heart he shepherded them and guided them with skillful hands.
Hebrew 9 said:
Hebrew 9 said:But when the Messiah appeared as cohen gadol of the good things that are happening already, then, through the greater and more perfect Tent which is not man-made (that is, it is not of this created world), 12 he entered the Holiest Place once and for all.
23Now this is how the copies of the heavenly things had to be purified, but the heavenly things themselves require better sacrifices than these. 24 For the Messiah has entered a Holiest Place which is not man-made and merely a copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, in order to appear now on our behalf in the very presence of God. 25 Further, he did not enter heaven to offer himself over and over again, like the cohen hagadol who enters the Holiest Place year after year with blood that is not his own; 26 for then he would have had to suffer death many times - from the founding of the universe on. But as it is, he has appeared once at the end of the ages in order to do away with sin through the sacrifice of himself. 27 Just as human beings have to die once, but after this comes judgment, 28 so also the Messiah, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, i will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to deliver those who are eagerly waiting for him.
Zayit said:We are priests in that we serve him, not out of lineage, but out of love.
David Sterns "Complete Jewish Bible".Child of the Most High said:Shimshon,
What translation are you quoting from?
shimshon said:Yeshua is our Cohen HaGadol. Why would we need men (Levi'im) to continue in this way when Elohim has provided the True way, the fulfilled way, the way it was ment to be. How can we live in the shadows when the light is upon us?
Child of the Most High said:So, what was taught about the Hebrew Matthew?
Zayit said:Son of David through Nathan, not Shlomo
shimshon said:He seems to be a proponent of an original Hebrew Matthew. Yes, he claims the greek is mistranslated. Something I have come to believe within my own studies LONG before I ever even heard of this man. Probably long before this man started his ministry.
shimshon said:And that the greek eroneously entered in "husband" because it made more sense to them. I've not heard this one before. On the front is seems plausible knowing the other misundestandings the greeks laid ontop of the Jewishness of the writings. Threading the eye of a needle with a camle is another. Quite understandable if you knew the context. Completely misunderstood by Grecko/Roman based Christianity.
shimshon said:Again, I am not promoting this as FACT. I am witnessing the information given to me and others at the conference by M. Rood in regard to HIS belief. Do I agree? I have not studied this out fully and STILL reserve my opinion till I have. I sense it has merit, I also know it is to be discerned by the Ruach.
Child of the Most High said:First observation, is Michael Rood a Greek scholar? The answer is no, nor is he a Hebrew scholar, so what does he base his understanding on?
Child of the Most High said:Nehemiah is a Hebrew scholar, but knows little about the NT and is not a believer.
Child of the Most High said:Credentialed scholars emphatically state that the Shem Tob Matthew is copied from a Latin vorlage. This Latin was copied from the Greek, making it a third or fourth generation copy.
Child of the Most High said:The eye of the needle theory is quite easy to disprove using the Peshitta's other renderings as as a proof example.
Child of the Most High said:Let me say this Shimshon. The Jehovah's witnesses, the Way International, and other fringe groups hold the same beliefs on texts that Michael Rood is presenting. This is really nothing new.
Child of the Most High said:I would recommend that you study this one out before making a decision.
Child of the Most High said:There was an interesting discussion about the Shem Tob Matthew and the Michael Rood tour and teachings on another forum. I will try and get you the links.
If you saw him why did you have to ask someone to tell you about him? Are the opinions in your post then based on second hand word of mouth, or actual on hand experiences?
When I witnessed him last week he stated in the begining of the event quite openly that he did 'not' dress like this everywhere but only on his tours and during his events.
How is this is denying the deity of Yeshua?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?