• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What is your disposition on marijuana?

  • Legalize it.

  • Medical uses only.

  • Keep illegal.


Results are only viewable after voting.

WalksWithChrist

Seeking God's Will
Jan 5, 2005
22,860
1,352
USA
Visit site
✟53,730.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
morningstar2651 said:
We've tried making alcohol illegal before. It was called "the prohibition" and it was quite possibly the single greatest thing America did to support organized crime.
That's exactly the point I was making.
 
Upvote 0

WalksWithChrist

Seeking God's Will
Jan 5, 2005
22,860
1,352
USA
Visit site
✟53,730.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Harlan Norris said:
If one is for absolute freedom, that one doesn't realise that there is no freedom without the law.Just chaos. Every man for himself.Not the kind of world I want to live in.You won't like it either.
This thread isn't about absolute freedom at all. It's about the opinions on the legality of *one* substance. You want to talk about absolute freedoms, start another thread. The law, as we see with pot, is wrong. The law we have doesn't help families. People are obviously going to smoke pot whether it is illegal or not. Tax it and regulate it so that gangsters don't peddle it anymore. It's not rocket science...we learned this lesson with prohibition.
 
Upvote 0

WalksWithChrist

Seeking God's Will
Jan 5, 2005
22,860
1,352
USA
Visit site
✟53,730.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
I'm confused. You're saying pot use is increasing while it is illegal?
We've talked about this on another thread as I recall...pot isn't addictive. I smoked during my teens and early 20s and was never addicted. During some periods I smoked once a week or maybe not at all. I suffered *no* ill effects. Ever. It'd be nice if you could at least acknowledge this.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Peacebestill said:
At least you'll never get glaucoma.

link
 
Upvote 0

susanann

Senior Veteran
Nov 5, 2005
4,432
178
✟28,020.00
Faith
Christian
WalksWithChrist said:
I'm confused. You're saying pot use is increasing while it is illegal?
.


Pot use HAS increased in use since it was made illegal.

Pot use has increased greatly after 1939, and it now is being used more than at any time prior to 1939 when it was legal.


Illegality has increased its use.
 
Upvote 0

WalksWithChrist

Seeking God's Will
Jan 5, 2005
22,860
1,352
USA
Visit site
✟53,730.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
susanann said:
Pot use HAS increased in use since it was made illegal.

Pot use has increased greatly after 1939, and it now is being used more than at any time prior to 1939 when it was legal.


Illegality has increased its use.
Then it would appear the War on Drugs has been lost.
 
Upvote 0

susanann

Senior Veteran
Nov 5, 2005
4,432
178
✟28,020.00
Faith
Christian
WalksWithChrist said:
Then it would appear the War on Drugs has been lost.


The vietnam war was a huge success, compared to the War on Drugs.

Any way you want to measure it, the drug war has been a dismal failure.

Drug useage, drug arrests, drug convictions, drug imprisonment, drug availability, drug wars, drug related crime, drug raids, drug testing, are all now much higher than before the war on drugs began.

A child today, as a result of the drug war, is now much more likely to be exposed to drugs, be affected by people on drugs, than in the 1960's, or any time period prior to the beginning of the war on drugs.


Not only has the drug war been lost, there is not even any hope of ever getting back to the levels we had before the drug war was started, and no hope of ever getting back our privacy and freedom from being searched, freedom from not being drug tested, etc.


Even if we returned to sanity, some lasting effects might be with us. For example, prohibition caused lots of people to switch from being beer drinkers, to drinking hard alcohol, and even after prohibition was repealed, lots of people kept drinking hard liquor and didnt go back to beer as their main drink. Ditto with drugs. Even if we legalized it, some of the people who got started on drugs since 1970 might continue to use drugs if we made it legal.
 
Upvote 0

Maynard Keenan

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2004
8,470
789
39
Louisville, KY
✟35,085.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

The point is that it is illogical to keep pot illegal while alcohol is legal.
 
Upvote 0

susanann

Senior Veteran
Nov 5, 2005
4,432
178
✟28,020.00
Faith
Christian
Maynard Keenan said:
The point is that it is illogical to keep pot illegal while alcohol is legal.


Depends on how you look at it.

It IS logical, if you consider that the president, the governor, all the congressmen and senators, all the police, all the judges and prosecuting attornies -- all use the alcohol drug.


The people that make and enforce our laws, use a drug that they made legal.

If police and legislators used marijuanna instead of alcohol, then it would be alcohol that is illegal and pot would be legal.


They dont mind making some other drug is illegal, as long as their own drug (alcohol) is kept legal.


That is human nature, the evil of human nature.


Most people are not against all drugs, they are against the drugs that they personally dont use.
Some people use caffiene, others use nicotine, others use alcohol, etc.

They are all drugs.

Caffiene, alcohol, and nicotine are legal - only because too many people in our government use them.
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟35,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Harlan Norris said:
Your position is encouragement.
No, it's not.
You are for pot use.
No, I'm not.
Pot is an addictive drug.
No. it's not.
People that use will chose it over their job, the safety of their children,their marriage,their relationship with their parents.
No, they won't.
How can this be a good thing?
A strawman is never a good thing.
How can this be harmless?
In this case, as most, the strawman is completely harmless.
A man I know of who was diagnosed with bladder cancer,showed me a pamphlet the doc gave him.It stated that 88% of those with that particular type of cancer,were pot users.
Irrelevant.
Clearly it isn't harmless.
Neither is walking down the street.
The law is for our protection and should remain.
So you support a nanny state?
 
Upvote 0

Marek

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2003
1,670
60
Visit site
✟2,139.00
Faith
Catholic
I haven't really been following this thread, so I don't know if this has been said or not, but what about the fact that marijuana is a mind-altering drug? Now I know that alcohol is also, but with one hit of marijuana, one can lose a significant amount of capacity to move or think (believe me, I know). In terms of alcohol, one would either have to take many drinks or drink something very strong. In the case of a very strong alcoholic drink, one could tell that it is strong and take the necessary precautions to not get too drunk. But if someone takes a hit of marijuana, not knowing its strength, they could be severly affected. I believe this is a major safety concern with the legalization of marijuana.
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟35,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Your claims are overstated. Marijuana is not debilitating. Marijuana is widely used, so it's legality isn't an issue in this regard. How many accidents occur because of alcohol compared to pot? There you will find your answer.
 
Upvote 0

Marek

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2003
1,670
60
Visit site
✟2,139.00
Faith
Catholic
nvxplorer said:
Your claims are overstated. Marijuana is not debilitating.
From my experiences, it is. Maybe you haven't tried the good stuff?

How many accidents occur because of alcohol compared to pot?
Though I'm sure there are no good statistics on this, probably not too many. This might have something to do with there being a lot less pot smokers than alcohol drinkers though.

I'm just curious; do you believe that drugs like cocaine, ecstacy, and heroin should be legal? Because if you do, then my concerns don't really apply to your views.
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟35,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Marek said:
From my experiences, it is. Maybe you haven't tried the good stuff?
Sure I have. Maybe I have better control over my mental faculties than most.

The effect from marijuana is determined by the level of THC in the bloodstream. One only needs to smoke more low grade weed to achieve the same effect.

Though I'm sure there are no good statistics on this, probably not too many. This might have something to do with there being a lot less pot smokers than alcohol drinkers though.
No, it would be painfully obvious if marijuana users were causing havoc in society. It would be plastered all over our local news reports.

I'm just curious; do you believe that drugs like cocaine, ecstacy, and heroin should be legal? Because if you do, then my concerns don't really apply to your views.
Switzerland has legalized heroin with positive results. Addiction has not increased significantly, but related crimes such as theft have decreased drastically. Heroin users who previously spent their time stealing and getting high are now working (and getting high).

Cocaine is a truly dangerous drug. I wouldn't support legalizing it for sale, but I would treat abuse as a medical problem, not a legal problem.

I don't know anything about ecstacy.
 
Upvote 0

Mocca

MokAce - Priest of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
Jan 1, 2006
1,529
45
38
✟24,437.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian

Wow, awesome. Would you like to provide a source?
 
Upvote 0

Nightson

Take two snuggles and call me in the morning
Jul 11, 2005
4,470
235
California
✟5,839.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
nvxplorer said:
I don't know anything about ecstacy.

In it's pure form, pretty much no negativ effects. On the street with 10,000 other things mixed in, has a chance of killing you. Anoher drug that would benefit from legalization.
 
Upvote 0

Goatboy

Senior Member
Feb 17, 2006
662
73
The Attic
✟23,681.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Harlan Norris said:
You smoke so damn much because your an addict.

Sad, but true, however I am fighting a long cold war against nicotine and one day hope to be tobacco free (well, except blunts and Cuban cigars).

Now marijuana, I can use to excess or let it pass me by, spend long periods both using and abstaining.

I ain’t addicted to pot.


And what gall you have implying otherwise.
(I mean if you had an actual argument to offer you might have taken a look at my figures instead).


The law has been in effect since the 30s. It's not like it's anything new.In the 60s pot became a cultural phenomenon.Before then it was a non issue. No one I knew even talked about it.The number of dope smokers has steadily increased since then.

Well debatable (it’s not just Americans in this discussion you know), but frankly uninteresting.

Unless your point is that pot should remain illegal because of the sixties.

You might want to try working an actual argument in there somewhere.


Now people are saying to deprive one of pot is like depriving one of air. Just isn't true.

Well one is restricting the right to life, the other is restriction of an individual’s right to self determination.

Who was it you heard claiming that these are equivalents?
 
Upvote 0