Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,066
- 7,423
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you believe in macroevolution, what do you think man will evolve into next?
Sounds like you are describing the allele frequency of the species. Those things can change if the situation/environment changes. That's evolution.85% of the world are followers and 1% leaders. The rest are a threatened species. Followers don't evolve and leaders don't like change.
so basically any genetic gene in the population is evolution? the problem with that definition is that almost every creationists will agree with this situation so basically you are saying that about 100% of creationists also believe in evolution.Sounds like you are describing the allele frequency of the species. Those things can change if the situation/environment changes. That's evolution.
I think man is devolving. We no longer have basic skills, but we are pretty good at having computers do our work for us.
I think man is devolving. We no longer have basic skills, but we are pretty good at having computers do our work for us.
Same thing as far as I'm concerned.
Or making use of the tools available to us.Becoming more reliant on technology is just... laziness.
Or making use of the tools available to us.
A stick and stone are readily available without technology. Golf will never die.
so basically any genetic gene in the population is evolution? the problem with that definition is that almost every creationists will agree with this situation so basically you are saying that about 100% of creationists also believe in evolution.
In fact, young Earth creationists are hyper-evolutionists because they need evolution to create millions of species in only a few thousand years.
That wasn't the point. The point was that creationists must believe in speciation because there are more species alive now than the number of "kinds" which would have fit on the Ark, that's all.why do you think that we cant get so many species in few thousands years? as i said in the past- we have empirical evidence that speciation may take about less then 100 years:
Rapid Evolution Changes Species in Real Time | DiscoverMagazine.com
Watching new species evolve in real time
so lets assume a tipical speciation event= 100 years. under that situation we can get millions of species in a very short time.
thats not pitabread claim: "they need evolution to create millions of species in only a few thousand years". he clearly talked about the time problem.That wasn't the point. The point was that creationists must believe in speciation because there are more species alive now than the number of "kinds" which would have fit on the Ark, that's all.
Well, it is a problem because there is no evidence that such a thing happened--the physical evidence just isn't there--and even more striking that it could have happened during historical times and nobody noticed or mentioned it. But no; Pitabread's point was that creationists not only have to believe in evolution too (and some do and are quite happy to admit that evolution of the "kinds" happened after The Flood) but that it would have to happen even faster than science supposes.thats not pitabread claim: "they need evolution to create millions of species in only a few thousand years". he clearly talked about the time problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?