• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Oct 19, 2002
142
41
Suburban Chicago
✟40,199.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Taken in July, 2003, with a Pentax MX, Tamron 75-300mm TeleMacro lens and 1A skylight filter, on Kodak Max ASA 400 film, and scanned with a HP ScanJet 6200. No editing

L
 

Attachments

  • butterfly1.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 62
  • butterfly2.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 64
Upvote 0

Sonifo

fotographer
Mar 23, 2004
84
7
55
Visit site
✟244.00
Faith
Baptist
Very nice shots, folks!

I would love to take pictures of butterflies. The ones here are so shy and move so fast. I captured one the other day and felt bad so I let him go.

I did take some pictures of a bumble bee that buzzed by me while I was taking pictures of some yellow flowers.

I also got some pictures of these black ants that we seen up in the mountains. Scarey little boogers.
 

Attachments

  • spidermacro.jpg
    64.9 KB · Views: 54
  • antmacro.jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 54
  • bumblemacro.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 52
  • bumblemacro2.jpg
    76.9 KB · Views: 48
Upvote 0

michabo

reason, evidence
Nov 11, 2003
11,355
493
50
Vancouver, BC
Visit site
✟14,055.00
Faith
Atheist
Sonifo,

Those are cool pics. What's going on with the ant in the first one? It looks like it has its head in a spider. And the second ant looks downright mean. I'm impressed that you were able to get good focus on moving targets. I spent about thirty minutes taking a picture of a spider yesterday morning and I don't have a single shot where it is properly focused. In this pic, the thorn and legs at the bottom of the picture are out of focus when the legs at the top are sharp.

I also took another picture of a fiddlehead which was perfectly stationary but even that, I had a hard time focusing. At f/4, the background blur would look very nice but I wouldn't be able to get all of the subject properly focused. This is at f/9 and the right side of the fiddlehead is out of focus though it is parallel to the film plane (I thought). Even still, the background is getting distracting.

I never knew macro photography would be so hard! So many things to pay attention to. Does anyone have any tips or tricks of the trade?

(These were with my 90mm f/2.8 Tamron, BTW)
 

Attachments

  • CRW_2900.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 56
  • CRW_2901.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 60
Upvote 0

Sonifo

fotographer
Mar 23, 2004
84
7
55
Visit site
✟244.00
Faith
Baptist
It is really hard to shoot a macro with all the bug in focus. You have to have one awesome lens to do that. I know a guy who can get so close to a sponge that it looks like something held under a microscope.

I hope to achieve what he does someday. That really isn't a bad shot. I like it. Maybe a bit more lighting. Not sure what to tell you about the f-stop. Did you use your flash? I had to on mine or it would have been way to dark. They have macro lights you can buy that are a ring shaped.

You talk about hard, try taking a picture of a water drop in this up close. It is hard.
 
Upvote 0

michabo

reason, evidence
Nov 11, 2003
11,355
493
50
Vancouver, BC
Visit site
✟14,055.00
Faith
Atheist
Sonifo said:
Did you use your flash? I had to on mine or it would have been way to dark. They have macro lights you can buy that are a ring shaped.
I've been looking at the ring flashes and some off-camera flashes too. I think that might be the answer - at least it gives enough light to use f/11 or something decent. Then there's the problem with too much background, but you can't have everything

Do you use the on-board flash, an external (but still mounted) flash, an off-camera flash, or a ring flash?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Hako

Active Member
Mar 10, 2004
69
0
✟179.00
Faith
Methodist
shooting macro, to get back-to-front sharpness is virtually impossible with a 35mm type camera. The closer you get, the shallower the depth of field.

The only way around this is the use a bellows camera which allows you to twist the lens and film plane independently, and a tiny aperture like f45.

The best thing, is to realize that you are not going to get back-to front sharpness, and use it to your advantage.
 
Upvote 0