Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The believer can produce the fruit of the Holy Spirit.So what benefit is there to a new heart? What can a believer do that an unbeliever cannot?
I don't think you understand how conversations work. I wasn't making an argument. I was challenging yours by using statements that you made.You are still being evasive in what you believe. Tell it to me straight. Break it down to me in a timeline.
...
Here is a little parable I wrote to illustrate the Calvinist perspective on free will.
The "Liver & Onions Parable"
The Reformed Doctrine of Free Will
Suppose you detest L&O. The sight and smell makes you sick.
Just once, to appease a friend that insisted that L&O really is good tasting, you touched your tongue's tip to the L&O and the taste repulsed you.
You are invited to a buffet where a friend suggests you try some L&O. You refuse. He insists that the L&O is wonderful. He takes a bite and smiles saying "Just try it." You say, "No way!"
You freely reject the L&O because of your senses (sight, taste and smell). You do so on this occasion and every occasion it is offered to you. Your action regarding L&O is predictable and certain.
SUCH is the unregenerate person's free rejection of God because his heart and nature is only evil continuously.
===
Now suppose this L&O loather is supernaturally changed into a L&O lover.
God changes his taste buds as well as olfactory and mental responses. Now, at the buffet he asks his friend, "What smells so good?" He is surprised to find that the great smell comes from a plate of L&O! He is further surprised that it really doesn't look that bad now, in fact it looks good. He is salivating.
He grabs a fork and timidly takes a small bite to his tongue for a test. The test becomes a taste -- then he eats a huge serving. L&O has suddenly become his favorite food. From that day on he looks for L&O whenever he can find it and he specifically requests it. He is a L&O lover now.
He freely and predictably chooses L&O after this craving has been placed upon him by God.
SUCH is the response of one who is regenerated by receiving a new heart and nature.
====
BTW, in Heaven... Everyone loves L&O. Nothing else is eaten or even desired. All freely savor the smell and taste of L&O forever and ever. Hallelujah!
People are not MADE to like liver and onions.
They are MADE a "new creation".
This new creation simply loves liver and onions.
The old man still hates liver and onions.
No one can make him like liver and onions.
In fact, no one can make him do anything good at all.
He needs to be put to death.
The jailer asks Paul and Silas what must he do to be saved. Does Paul and Silas say,
"There is NOTHING you can do." "You have to wait and see if God regenerates you first and then you will see whether or not you can come and accept the Lord."?
But was this what Paul and Silas had said to the jailer? No. Most definitely not.
Paul and Silas said,
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house."
....
Please do not take this the wrong way, and I say this in love, but there is nothing further to discuss if you do not tell me what you believe plainly. I have asked you repeatedly to tell me clearly in what you believe in regards to regeneration and free will. But you have refused to tell me.I don't think you understand how conversations work. I wasn't making an argument. I was challenging yours by using statements that you made.
Your question is bogus to the hilt. We know from many verses that we are justified on the basis of faith. Just like salvation; we are saved br grace through faith.Does it say that he was regenerated or justified? If not, it must not have happened, right?
I plainly believe I asked you a question about your post which you are refusing to answer.There is nothing further to discuss if you do not tell me what you believe plainly.
...
But it doesn't say that in the text. That's my point.Your question is bogus to the hilt. We know from many verses that we are justified on the basis of faith. Just like salvation; we are saved br grace through faith.
Did he support his quip with Scripture?As a seminary prof of mine used to say, "God tickles our willer."
The only problem with this parable is that there is no Scripture that teaches that one is regenerated in order to believe, or, as in your parable, to love L&O.
Regeneration changes the human being into a "new creature". And that new creature or creation is said to be "in Christ".
Well, Paul was clear about who is "in Christ". Only believers are that.
So there is no indication from Scripture that one is regenerated in order to become a believer.
But what do you think of Noah being a preacher of righteousness? Did the people in the global flood have the capacity to hear and listen to Noah's preaching and repent and believe in God? Yes, or no?Not hyper Calvinism at all. That is the standard view of Calvinism. It's called Total Depravity. The "T" of the TULIP.
What does this passage teach? Certainly not regeneration, because regeneration is spiritual, not physical.John 11:43 When He had said these things, He cried out with a loud voice, "Lazarus, come forth." 44 The man who had died came forth, bound hand and foot with wrappings, and his face was wrapped around with a cloth.
Lazarus was dead as a hammer when Jesus called him...
11:39 Martha, the sister of him that was dead, saith unto him, Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days.
Well, I believe you are being fuzzy. So until you tell me what I would like to know, I am moving on, my friend.I'm not being fuzzy. I'm telling you that you are incorrect in what you think hyper-Calvinism is, and that you should look more into it. If that's not clear, perhaps that explains why you have difficulties understanding what we tell you.
So what? Not every single doctrine in Scripture is found in a single text. You've made no point.But it doesn't say that in the text. That's my point.
Please explain how Jn 3:3 explains your L&O parable. I don't see any connection. Sorry.John 3:3
John 3:3 is talking about seeing Jesus and or His Kingdom. It is about making sure how we first need to have a changed and new heart spiritually by God in order for us go home to Him and enter into the joy of our Lord.John 3:3
Did he support his quip with Scripture?
Maybe you are just forgetting the discussion
So how does God help us concerning faith?
Yes I know that. I was commenting overall on your use of and emphasis on the word "MADE"It was not my analogy. It was Dr Steve's analogy.
I don't agree that it is the same thing.Same thing. If a person is made into a new creation to like liver and onions and or a person is made to like liver and onions, then that is saying the same thing. They are changed in some way to like liver and onions. The point is that you believe there was some kind of change by God that would over-ride a man's free will to like liver and onions.
In a word --- YES.But please know I am not against the concept of the believer in having a new birth and in having a changed and new nature. I simply believe this new nature is the result of when a person submits to God first. Do you believe a person can submit to God of their own free will? Yes, or no?
It probably needs to be a more nuanced statement than that to be understood.Not denying that the old man needs to be put to death and a person needs a new nature by being born again. This is not a denial of one's free will choice of choosing God in this life. The point comes down to whether or not you believe God just makes some people to be believers and others to not be believers. That it was always in God's hands in who really believed or not. Is that what you are saying? ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?