Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, he doesn’t actually say it, he implies it.Jimmy Kimmel Did Not Say Exactly What You Think He Said
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Kimmel doesn’t actually say “this kid” was “one of them.” You could read it a different way: Robinson wasn’t MAGA, and therefore MAGA is out there trying to characterize him as something else. Or even: Who knows if Robinson was or wasn’t MAGA, either way MAGA is trying to score points based on his politics.
Kimmel himself would seem to be of this opinion. In Hollywood Reporter‘s latest story detailing how the suspension went down behind the scenes, Kimmel is said to have been “defending what he said [as] being grossly mischaracterized by a certain group of people.”
He said something wrong and got suspended for a few days. No big deal.Jimmy Kimmel Did Not Say Exactly What You Think He Said
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Kimmel doesn’t actually say “this kid” was “one of them.” You could read it a different way: Robinson wasn’t MAGA, and therefore MAGA is out there trying to characterize him as something else. Or even: Who knows if Robinson was or wasn’t MAGA, either way MAGA is trying to score points based on his politics.
Kimmel himself would seem to be of this opinion. In Hollywood Reporter‘s latest story detailing how the suspension went down behind the scenes, Kimmel is said to have been “defending what he said [as] being grossly mischaracterized by a certain group of people.”
POTUS says more falsehoods than this every day. I think it's more than a bit odd that the right wants to muzzle a talk show host for one comment while it turns its collective head over many more falsehoods and untoward statements made by POTUS. That's a real head scratcher.Yes,! That’s what he did. He implied that Kirk’s assassin was one of the MAGA faithful
You’ve got the wrong person. I think Kimmel should be able to say anything he wants. And I think the broadcasters can choose whether or not to air it.POTUS says more falsehoods than this every day. I think it's more than a bit odd that the right wants to muzzle a talk show host for one comment while it turns its collective head over many more falsehoods and untoward statements made by POTUS. That's a real head scratcher.
Disney, Sinclair and Nexstar are the ones who did the muzzling.POTUS says more falsehoods than this every day. I think it's more than a bit odd that the right wants to muzzle a talk show host for one comment while it turns its collective head over many more falsehoods and untoward statements made by POTUS. That's a real head scratcher.
It's not an analogy; it's just the way a left/right dichotomy works. The objective view is at the center of two opposing subjective equally valid views.Sorry, the analogy doesn't work with politics.
I have doubts that they are equally valid views when it comes to politicsIt's not an analogy; it's just the way a left/right dichotomy works. The objective view is at the center of two opposing subjective equally valid views.
See these dichotomies --> Democracy/autocracy, worker/employer, consumer/supplier, liberal/conservative. <-- These are all political left/right dichotomies, and they all work the same way; The objective view is at the center of two opposing subjective equally valid views.
Kimmel showed the Spirit of Christ when loving others as himself. His words expressed understanding and forgiveness for those who had misunderstood him and slandered him.One thing that stood out in Kimmel's comeback monologe was the lack of an apology which is really all that was being asked of him.
TPUSA responds:
I appreciate the candor. I can see that's the problem. Do you realize that liberal implies 'for change' and conservative implies 'stay the same'?I have doubts that they are equally valid views when it comes to politics
That’s all very interestingI appreciate the candor. I can see that's the problem. Do you realize that liberal implies 'for change' and conservative implies 'stay the same'?
And do you see that these --> 'for change/against change' <- these are subjective views? --> In other words, do you see that people have their own individual subjective opinions and beliefs about when and why we as a country should change direction and when and why we shouldn't?
Okay. But I still need you to answer this question, --> Do you see why these --> Liberal/conservative <-- are both considered subjective views, and not objective views? l will get to what 'equally valid' means, but in order to do that I need to know that you truly do understand why they are both subjective views and not objective views.That’s all very interesting
When it comes to politics, the right thinks the left is wrong.Okay. But I still need you to answer this question, --> Do you see why these --> Liberal/conservative <-- are both considered subjective views, and not objective views? l will get to what 'equally valid' means, but in order to do that I need to know that you truly do understand why they are both subjective views and not objective views.
You talk as if the terms left and right represent two binary personalities rather than actual substantive opposing views with valid interests to a community. I remind you that the ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy.When it comes to politics, the right thinks the left is wrong.
So, you're saying that you think that the left thinks they are the side of 'goodness'?The left thinks the right is evil.
Do you actually believe that nonsense? None of that is of the Spirit of God, it's all lies you're believing and repeating.That's the difference
Well there is a good portion of the right that thinks that abortion and trans ideology are evil, and our president has spouted off before but I still think there’s more of it on the left.Do you actually believe that? None of that is the Spirit of God. The left/right dichotomy is meant for analytics, not accusation and slander.
Yes, but that doesn't qualify as a left/right dichotomy. So don't be deceived, sin entered into all of mankind. Liberals and conservatives alike.Well there is a good portion of the right that thinks that abortion and trans ideology are evil...,
More what? Evil? Like I said, that's not a valid use of a left/right dichotomy. The left/right dichotomy is for analytics between substantive views with valid interests to a society, not back and forth accusations and slander...., and our president has spouted off before but I still think there’s more of it on the left.
Like I said above, a left/right dichotomy is for analytics, and it functions as designed when it's used properly. What you're describing is propaganda.It sounds like the left/right dichotomy doesn’t function in reality
No, I wasn’t saying there is more evil on the left, I meant more of the left think that the other side is evilThat doesn't qualify as a left/right dichotomy. So don't be deceived, sin entered into all of mankind. Liberals and conservatives alike.
More what? Evil? Like I said, that's not a valid use of a left/right dichotomy. The left/right dichotomy is for analytics between substantive views with valid interests to a society, not accusations and slander.
Like I said above, a left/right dichotomy is for analytics, and it functions as designed when it's used properly. What you're describing is propaganda.
Up front I'm going to state that any reasoning based on something false but believed to be true, ends in a contradiction.No, I wasn’t saying there is more evil on the left, I meant more of the left think that the other side is evil
NoUp front I'm going to state that any reasoning based on something false but believed to be true, ends in a contradiction.
Now do you think it's eviler of the left to think the right is eviler, because the right thinks the left is less evil than the right? <--- See the contradiction?
BPPLEE said:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?