Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just like we have no other choice, but to act as bacteria?We have no other choice, but to act as primates.
Just like we have no other choice, but to act as mammals.
Just like we have no other choice, but to act as tetrapods.
Rather: just like we have no other choice but to ack like eukaryotes.Just like we have no other choice, but to act as bacteria?
No, I asked about bacteria.Rather: just like we have no other choice but to ack like eukaryotes.
Rather: just like we have no other choice but to ack like eukaryotes.
... produce mycotoxins?We act as bacteria, in that we reproduce, take in nutrients, produce wastes.......
No, I asked about bacteria.
(I'm about to spring Klebold & Harris on you: my favorite examples of evolutionists acting out their nomenclature.)
Question: Do we have no other choice than to act like bacteria? YES or NO?
I'm so glad to see your shtick hasn't changed since JREF Forums. You spent five times the amount of your reply talking about me as you did repeating your debunked arguments.
I don't know you and don't understand what it is you are referring to.
I direct my replies at the argument and concepts not at the person.
As for debunked? That is a matter of opinion and nothing more.
As for my methodology here being identical to the one at Randi many years ago?
I beg to differ. Judging by the reactions, I am far more efficiently devastating now than I was then at pointing out the inane, evolutionist atheistic inanities and illogical inconsistencies than I was then.
I don't know you and don't understand what it is you are referring to.
I direct my replies at the argument and concepts not at the person.
As for debunked? That is a matter of opinion and nothing more.
As for my methodology here being identical to the one at Randi many years ago?
I beg to differ. Judging by the reactions, I am far more efficiently devastating now than I was then at pointing out the inane, evolutionist atheistic inanities and illogical inconsistencies than I was then.
No need to go to the extreme. The predictive ability is quite clear. Dr. Shubin was able to accurately predict where he and his team would find Tiktaalik. Evolution also predicts a fused chromosome in the human genome, which is also a falsifiable test, one of many that evolution passes with flying colors. Evolution accurately predicts a nested hierarchy in the fossil record, which is also confirmed with DNA.
Using proven liars that admit to intellectual dishonesty on their own site is not going to help your case.
That is untrue. I repeatedly request a rebuttal to my claims aimed at evolutionists but all I get in reply is what you just did.And yet you have done nothing of the sort.
That is untrue. I repeatedly request a rebuttal to my claims aimed at evolutionists but all I get in reply is what you just did.
I witnessed that throwing of a newborn baby in an incinerator as a child myself.Let's not insult the primates.
They do not torture their young, they do not rape them, they do not abort their babies, they do not starve them so they can go party or do drugs, they don't kill them, they have been known to kill, abandon sick or deformed ones as they will not survive. Males will sometimes kill to preserve their own blood line. And only one group has a heavy infant death due to mothers ignoring injured ones or killing them because they have no other way to deal with them, the tamarin monkey. They have twins and can not raise them when there are not enough males to support them. What they do is for the preservation of the species, not for sport, not for inconvenience. Otherwise, mothers have been known to fight to the death to protect their young. We throw them in the garbage--that's a favorite here in Las Vegas.
Untrue! I never receive a direct reply to my requests for a rebuttal to my claims.That's because your claims have been refuted time and again but you still keep coming back with them time and again.
Untrue! I never receive a direct reply to my requests for a rebuttal to my claims.
All I get is what you are doing.
BTW
Here is a very relevant video which illustrates my points:
You see, you folks evade such things. You neve respond directly to any of them. You simply make irrelevant claims.
No, a video is nothing. A video that says that it shows that there is a message in human DNA is fundamentally worth jack. And besides, your claims are also WILDLY off-topic since the thread is about human's evolving from ancestral monkeys. If you're going to make any comment, stick to the OP topic.
Once more it isn't the medium in which the message is conveyed. That is irrelevant and clearly demonstrates that you lack the basic requirement to reason cogently. It is the message itself-the info that is conveyed that either stands or falls on its own merit. If indeed it is bogus, then prove it. Otherwise your reply constitutes only a criticism of the m4dium and leaves the argument which you immediately and mindlessly seek to ridicule totally intact.
If indeed true and God is good, then our image must have become extremely warped in order to allow such things.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?