Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
actually, at university, you'd be expected to provide a citation supporting your claim that dolphins and humans are the only animals that have sex socially... so lets not get all high horsed about conforming to the university form guide there boy-o 'cos you just committed the cardinal university sin of failing to adequately reference your text.Ahh, because it's a by-product of sin for one.
Secondly, if you ever plan on going to uni or similar you are going to have to do a lot of work on your ability to reason and put forward an argument. It has already been ponted out that humans and dolphins are the two species that engage in sex socially. Therefore, your references to other animals is irrelevant to the point at hand.
So, how's that list of wonderful people concieved withing a homosexual relationship coming along? It's 'natural' after all.
Bonobos. Consider yourself disproved *smiles sweetly* http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/bonobo/behavDisprove it sunshine.
I have gathered that information from science documentaries etc. You got a problem with it, take it up with the scientific community.
Thank you for supporting my arguement on the perversity of homosexuality and the unnatural state of it. If you had bothered to read what I had posted I said that dolphins and humans are the only two species that engage in sex for reasons other than to procreate. If that's too big a word for you, I'll break it down. Humans and dolphins are the only species that have sex socially, without the aim being to make babies.
Since when has that been a hurdle to you with the dross you put up?actually, at university, you'd be expected to provide a citation supporting your claim that dolphins and humans are the only animals that have sex socially... so lets not get all high horsed about conforming to the university form guide there boy-o 'cos you just committed the cardinal university sin of failing to adequately reference your text.
(P.S. The bonobos would like to have a word with you about their social sex)
There are a large number of other animal species that engage in "if, then" behaviour, otherwise known as "reasoning ability"... most primates, several cetaceans, some canids and other predators, and several avians, notably corvids and parrots.Pull out a dictionary and read it yourself.
Funny, my dog regularly tries to hump my leg. Not only is that gay as he's male, it's kinda like reverse bestiality which I would think is unnatural. He must get some kind of pleasure out of it else he wouldn't do it.Disprove it sunshine.
I have gathered that information from science documentaries etc. You got a problem with it, take it up with the scientific community.
I'm not the one criticising others based on "if you ever go to university"Since when has that been a hurdle to you with the dross you put up?
Well there you go I learnt something new today. Perhaps my example to be teachable will serve as an example? I can live in hope at least.Bonobos. Consider yourself disproved *smiles sweetly* http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/bonobo/behav
Once again you choose to ignore what has actually been said. Use God's characteristics and priciples as a guide. If something is in conflict with God's nature then its not good.Well yeah... but no matter... I'm sure its one of those
"everything on THIS list is condemned, but everything NOT on THAT list is condemned... everything on THOSE lists are OK, and everything NOT on those OTHER lists is OK"... or something.
Then he'll accuse you of not taking it in context, and twisting scripture... and anyway, you aren't a real Christian, otherwise you'd know all this stuff.
I put that forward as a constructive point of criticism as if anyone tried to structure an argument like that they'd get grilled. Better to learn here than get a fail from a lecturer.I'm not the one criticising others based on "if you ever go to university"
its one of those pot vs. kettle things... don't criticise other people for failings you yourself posess.
Oh, and I'll happily reference any claim I have made that isn't personal opinion... just ask.
I thought it was a pretty good 5 second summary of some of the Biblical "logic" that floats around here...Once again you choose to ignore what has actually been said. Use God's characteristics and priciples as a guide. If something is in conflict with God's nature then its not good.
I do seem to recall you having a dig at people attacking the poster rather than the material. How about you take some of your own advice.
"You can safely conclude you have created God in your own image when it turns out that He hates all the same people you do" - Anne LamottWell yeah... but no matter... I'm sure its one of those
"everything on THIS list is condemned, but everything NOT on THAT list is condemned... everything on THOSE lists are OK, and everything NOT on those OTHER lists is OK"... or something.
Then he'll accuse you of not taking it in context, and twisting scripture... and anyway, you aren't a real Christian, otherwise you'd know all this stuff.
Hey.Well praise the Lord that I haven't done that!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?