- Aug 18, 2012
- 25,749
- 21,703
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That one judge is merely attempting to help Comey and James instead of allowing them to go to trial.
On what basis was the case dismissed?
Thank you for publicly sharing the perspectives of the administration.Don't cheer too quickly -
If she always tells the truth in the White House press room, she would be the first U.S. press secretary in history not to lie.She ain't a liar.
If the judge was biased, the case should be appealed to a higher court to seek reversal of the judge's decision.That one judge is merely attempting to help Comey and James instead of allowing them to go to trial.
Such a shame that a once well respected office has come down to this. Bondi should seek her pardon before Trump gets 25thed.Bondi targets James Comey, Letitia James in legal battle: 'Hold... accountable for unlawful conduct'
Attorney General Pam Bondi defends prosecutor Lindsey Halligan and promises legal action after court dismisses cases against James Comey and Letitia James.www.foxnews.com
That progressive liberal judge doesn't know the facts. She made a political decision instead of a lawful decision.
She ain't a liar.
Karoline Leavitt dishes out lies and insults at the White House – Baptist News Global
Infamous for his own trail of lies, Trump has a press secretary following in his wake both as a liar and as a crude name-caller.baptistnews.com BBC ‘100% fake news’, says Donald Trump’s press secretary
Comments by Karoline Leavitt follow allegations that Panorama documentary misled viewers with its editing of a Trump speechwww.theguardian.com
Everyone lies, it is part of our sin nature. Some just lie more than others. Psychologists have studied this enough that most psych tests will have questions on lying. Answer that you never lie may get your pre-employment application thrown out.
The above may show ignorance, hyperbole but perhaps not purposeful lies? Like the BBC is 100% fake news. Anyway, as to the case, from what I read it was quite legal. Not every court is political
A true progressive judge would have likely dismissed to where it can not be tried again. They did a favor to Trump because the insurance lawyer with no trial experience was losing the case.
Here is just one excerpt from google ai on this judge.
"U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie is considered
highly qualified and is widely respected in the legal community for her extensive experience, procedural rigor, and knowledge of the law."
I agree with Keith Gross and Mike Davis.Comey, James Escape Justice For Now Thanks To 'Partisan Judge'
"This abuse of judicial power was aided by the legislative branch," legal analyst Keith Gross told The Federalist.thefederalist.com
Why should they go through a trial, when they didn't do anything wrong. And they are just being harassed because Trump doesn't like them. I think they should sue Trump and his workers for harassment, Terrorizing, false firing and lying on them , especially James Comey.That one judge is merely attempting to help Comey and James instead of allowing them to go to trial.
Too bad for Gross and Davis they literally passed a law, signed by Bush in 2007 that makes their arguments irrelevant.I agree with Keith Gross and Mike Davis.
What law, specifically?Too bad for Gross and Davis they literally passed a law, signed by Bush in 2007 that makes their arguments irrelevant.
Comey lied to Congress.Why should they go through a trial, when they didn't do anything wrong. And they are just being harassed because Trump doesn't like them. I think they should sue Trump and his workers for harassment, Terrorizing, false firing and lying on them , especially James Comey.
I agree with Keith Gross and Mike Davis.
Maybe you can help the prosecution find the lie, because they seem to be struggling on that point:Comey lied to Congress.
28 U.S.C. § 546What law, specifically?
If judges are allowed to pick and choose federal DA's, then judges are overstepping their roles as judges. The DA must be selected by the Presidents and then approved by the Senate.28 U.S.C. § 546
The constitutional framework governing such appointments is rooted in the Appointments Clause, which no less a conservative judicial icon than the late Justice Antonin Scalia called "among the most significant structural safeguards of the constitutional scheme." Congress has long limited the attorney general's authority to make interim appointments. Under 28 U.S.C. § 546, the attorney general "may appoint" an interim U.S. attorney to serve for 120 days. Once that period expires, the authority to fill the vacancy shifts to the district court, which may appoint a U.S. attorney "to serve until the vacancy is filled." This design ensures that the executive branch cannot bypass the Senate indefinitely by stacking one temporary appointment atop another.The text and logic of § 546 make the limit clear. The statute's 120-day clock begins with the attorney general's initial appointment. To allow back-to-back interim appointments would effectively erase the limit, enabling perpetual evasion of the confirmation process that Congress required. The 120-day cap thus marks a deliberate boundary -- one that Congress intended to preserve Senate oversight and the judiciary's backstop role.
I see Comey’s lie right there in that article and I heard his lie while testifying to the Senate.Maybe you can help the prosecution find the lie, because they seem to be struggling on that point:
The Situation: Where’s the Lie?
The government’s response to James Comey’s vindictive prosecution raises one very big and important question.www.lawfaremedia.org
Here the specific text of the question Comey answered in his testimony matters a lot—for a number of reasons. Grassley asked Comey: “have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation” (emphasis added).
It is thus not adequate for proof that Comey made a false statement for the government to show that Richman interfaced with reporters on Comey’s behalf. That fact has never been a secret (Richman did much of this work in the open and on a named basis), and Comey has never denied it. In fact, it was Comey who dramatically announced Richman’s role in Senate testimony that the brief later quotes (see pages 10-11).
Rather, to prove that Comey lied, the government has to show (a) that Richman was “at the FBI” at the time; (b) that Comey “authorized” the press contact; (c) that he authorized Richman to do the contact anonymously; and (d) that the contact concerned the Trump or Clinton investigation.
The article then goes on to do what seems to me to be a very good job explaining how none of the things the prosecution tries to point to in their filing as evidence actually show the aforementioned things required to make Comey's statement false. So, where's the lie?
That said, once again, even if the government had the strongest evidence possible that Comey lied, that wouldn't have any effect on the question of whether Halligan's appointment was lawful.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?