Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, you did not "set the facts straight". The original claim was yours, which I corrected. The clip is still there for all to see and hear.I just set the facts straight. You can interpret the facts as you wish; but the facts remain.
That is the reality.
If there is no shame in age, why are you all age-shaming? Your actions contradict your words.There is no shame in age, anymore than there is shame in adverse effects of aging, hindering someone from continuing to be effective with their job. Are you suggesting that it is shameful to collect S.S. benefits?
Very true - it concerning to see - to me, he looked very frail.It doesn't look like his security give him a chance to get up on his own. They were pretty quick. And would have done the same for other presidents.
I'm not really concerned about his age. I'm concerned about how his aging might affect his job performance. Everyone ages a little bit differently.Nobody said there is shame in age. What was said was "Maybe the sand man came; and he was just taking another nap."
Another nap, like old people do.
Ageism.
"It's good to see the concern that his political opponents and their constituents have for our aging President."
Every human alive is aging every day. Why would we call the President 'aging', except as an indication he is old.
More ageism.
Does he need a wheelchair?Should it make any difference if he needed a wheelchair?
Yes I did.No, you did not "set the facts straight".
You were mistaken.The original claim was yours, which I corrected.
Yes it is. So is our dialogue for all to read.The clip is still there for all to see and hear.
More Ageism.
- I'm not really concerned about his age. I'm concerned about how his aging might affect his job performance. Everyone ages a little bit differently.
No shame. No shaming. Maybe you missed post #38.If there is no shame in age, why are you all age-shaming? Your actions contradict your words.
Absolutely not. However, he does not need one.Should it make any difference if he needed a wheelchair?
You seem to be mixing apples and oranges here. Congress passes bills. The President signs them into law.His job performance is good. He is getting bipartisan laws passed.
I haven't seen evidence to support this. I've seen evidence to the contrary. Maybe this is why even most Democrats don't want him to run again.He is acting Presidential. He has clear thoughts, and a quick wit.
I quoted it, and there is nothing wrong with his job performance. The real criticism of his job performance from the right is his ability pass his agenda they are against. If one cannot get him on policy, attack his person, his age, his stuttering or accusing his family of being a crime family like a mob boss.No shame. No shaming. Maybe you missed post #38.
Of course you don't. Because his agenda runs counter to yours. I am not sure you could give him credit for anything if you tried.I haven't seen evidence to support this. I've seen evidence to the contrary. Maybe this is why even most Democrats don't want him to run again.
I hadn't mention the criminal allegations, nor his stuttering.I quoted it, and there is nothing wrong with his job performance. The real criticism of his job performance from the right is his ability pass his agenda they are against. If one cannot get him on policy, attack his person, his age, his stuttering or accusing his family of being a crime family like a mob boss.
Sad when one connot see their own shaming tactics.
I did not say you did, unless your name is One. Is that you?I hadn't mention the criminal allegations, nor his stuttering.
He was expecting a handshake which never came his way. Where is the issue?I hadn't mention the criminal allegations, nor his stuttering.
It's moments like these that seriously call into question his "clear thoughts, and a quick wit."
Did you review the evidence? Never say never. Schumer had just shaken his hand moments before. That is the point.I did not say you did, unless your name is One. Is that you?
He was expecting a handshake which never came his way. Where is the issue?
That was a hand gesture, and not trying shake anybody's hand. I am amazed at the continued attempt to make Biden look senile - old - feeble.Did you review the evidence? Never say never. Schumer had just shaken his hand moments before. That is the point.
Who is he waiting for to shake his hand here?:
Wow, you're making fun of his speech impediment now?I hadn't mention the criminal allegations, nor his stuttering.
It's moments like these that seriously call into question his "clear thoughts, and a quick wit."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?