Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you think that the difference between the name of Shem Tob and Shem Tov is significant? If not, then what error have I posted?I can refute it... but all you have done is repeated somebody else's error.
The V and B difference only show you don't know the language so I know you are English only and at the mercy of translators and Strong's.Do you think that the difference between the name of Shem Tob and Shem Tov is significant? If not, then what error have I posted?
The doctrine of the Trinity was Christianity's attempt to force-fit monotheism into Elohism. There are many reasons why it's not a good theological description of deity, one of these is that there's no person of the trinity that has a female physical form as would be implied by Genesis 1:26-27.
Non sequitur. The translators and Strong's get it wrong often enough to be a problem. The meaning of the V & B differences goes back to the Sefer Yetzirah.The V and B difference only show you don't know the language so I know you are English only and at the mercy of translators and Strong's.
Another non sequitur. You are apparently unable to find anything relevant from your book to back up your argument.And it is here (above) where you are wrong. You prove with this statement that you have literally no idea how the doctrine developed, which is why I suggested that book.
You're an atheist so I don't expect you to grasp this anyway because the bible, to you, is a joke. But for somebody like @Theo102 it shouldn't be such a stretch. I can post hundreds, literally, hundreds of verses that prove Yeshua was God in the flesh. In fact, I can post so many verses and make so many connections that you'll stop reading because of time. But that's just it, time. I see it (time) as a precious gift from God and I won't spend it on anyone who only wants to argue and take shots at others. So Theo, it isn't that I don't have a response, it is that in my 20 years of forums, I know you are not serious about hearing anything outside of what you currently believe. You are not seeking any deeper truth as related to Yeshua's deity, you are fighting against it which means anything I say will fall on deaf ears so why waste the time? So you can take your little uppity reply of "non sequitur" and keep it with your assumption that I am clueless. I am fine with that.If I were a believer, I could only be a Unitarian. Trinitarianism is--as Thomas Jefferson and his buddy Joseph Priestly (an English chemist and philosopher) believed--"mental insanity."
At least we don't burn trinity-deniers at the stake anymore.
The Murder of Michael Servetus
So Theo, it isn't that I don't have a response, it is that in my 20 years of forums, I know you are not serious about hearing anything outside of what you currently believe. You are not seeking any deeper truth as related to Yeshua's deity, you are fighting against it which means anything I say will fall on deaf ears so why waste the time?
when you finally realize that you are just parroting the ideas of others and have done no study on your own
Frank Turek has a very good analogy on this.
He explains that we can never fully comprehend the nature of God but we can apprehend Him.
Like the ocean, you know it's there and it's vast but we can never fully know what is going on in its depths.
Well who said its not supposed to be completely logical. God who gave us logic would not want us to use it to know him? What for did God give us logic?
If you argue for ignorance then that's what you get.Frank Turek has a very good analogy on this.
He explains that we can never fully comprehend the nature of God but we can apprehend Him.
Like the ocean, you know it's there and it's vast but we can never fully know what is going on in its depths.
Since God is love, this implies (by logic and philosophy) that he has someone to love. Therefore, there are at least two persons of the Trinity. The Bible informs us that there are three.Can we comprehend the understanding of trinity through logic or faith alone?
YHWH doesn't care about persons. Deu 10:17. You are misreading the Bible.Since God is love, this implies (by logic and philosophy) that he has someone to love. Therefore, there are at least two persons of the Trinity. The Bible informs us that there are three.
It's a bad thing because without logic you have no way to distinguish between false inferences and true ones. The doctrine of the trinity is illogical because it is inconsistent with the facts, eg Genesis 1:26-27.I haven't read every reply here, but I would say that it is most obviously illogical, and that's not a bad thing. It just means it does not fit within the human-created categories
Some certainly are...Humans are ignorant.
You mean the one that basically trippled life expectancy?They're ignorant of the broken humanist security model.
Actually, for the vast majority of people.For the predators, but not for the prey.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?