• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is there a purely theoretical reason, for humbling yourself?

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Hi there,

So there is science and there is God, and most of the time, people try to separate the two, rather than specify a meaningful objectivity that allows science to be conducted without dictating the metaphysical to people who only want to be moral. But God is humble, and He forebears with scientists and believes alike, never really taking credit for anything, that men would suppose was valuable enough to sell or contemplate.

The question I have then, is: is there a purely theoretical reason, for humbling yourself? Is there something God knows scientifically, about the validity of His stance on the impartiality of truth (such that he does not comment on scientific proceedings)? Could science learn from this?

Thoughts?