Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A guy at my church says it's true, but I doubt it is divinely inspired because it makes many far fetched claims. It was also rejected by the early church, similar to the gnostic gospels (which came out in medieval times-after the New Testament was finished-and thus were added after Revelation and couldn't have been true). I've done research on this, and its hard to come to a conclusion.
I have read the other books, including Enoch. I consider them histories and read them as such. I think it is important to find out what was going on back then.Frankly I have had a lot of questions answered that I had about the Bible by reading them.
What lesson did you learn? I don't see how reading these books could any more harmful than reading a novel. If you read them as you would any other history book and not as scripture then it is only knowledge .I personally do not believe in reading these non-cannlical books. I read a few of the Nag Hamadi library years back.
Who were they written by? Did the writer have first hand knowledge and experiences or was it written after?
I learned my lesson in this area.
What lesson did you learn? I don't see how reading these books could any more harmful than reading a novel. If you read them as you would any other history book and not as scripture then it is only knowledge .
Well, when you read a book that has to do with the Bible and adds more to ceratain stories and people, it is hard to read the actual Bible without that knowledge sitting there behind it.
For instance, I believe Enoch was Noah's grandfather or father. So, IMHO reading Enoch would add somethings to the story of Noah and to the context of what the world was like in those days. Since 'in the days of Noah' is used to describe a very pivotal time in Christain history, a time where God saw so much evil in the world that he wiped out most of humanity with the flood, I don't believe that you or I can read that book (which is not part of the Bible) and have it change to some degree the way you understand the actual Bible.
So, I don't read them because they are not the Word of God, which is what the books of the Bible are.
Listen everyone, God works with you on whatever level you are at. If you are comfortable reading extra-biblical texts - such as the Book of Enoch, newspapers, textbooks, internet articles etc. then He will show you revelations through those AS WELL AS THE BIBLE. If you are not comfortable reading extra-biblical texts, then He will show you revelations through the Bible. Point blank. God understands exactly where you are coming from. Point blank. Do whatever you want but don't discourage other people from searching into sources that God has placed on their hearts.
The whole purpose of reading history is to understand the past. Don't you think we need to have an idea of what the days of Noah were like from a historical point of view? The Bible is very vague about those days. But the Book of Enoch colors in (so to speak) and fleshes out the culture, the people,and, the landscape for a more comprehensive understanding of why our Father decided to destroy every living thing upon the face of the Earth in the flood.
Listen everyone, God works with you on whatever level you are at. If you are comfortable reading extra-biblical texts - such as the Book of Enoch, newspapers, textbooks, internet articles etc. then He will show you revelations through those AS WELL AS THE BIBLE. If you are not comfortable reading extra-biblical texts, then He will show you revelations through the Bible. Point blank. God understands exactly where you are coming from. Point blank. Do whatever you want but don't discourage other people from searching into sources that God has placed on their hearts.
To be clear, I am not against historical books at all. I am against the extra-biblical books (non-orthodox Christian texts). Such as the ones found in Nag Hamdi (I know I spelled that wrong)Without historical material, there would be less known about Scriptures understanding. V There is adding and subtracting done in many churches across the world on Sunday's. We shouldn't fear historical books, but the book of Enoch, from my past experience, conflicts with Scripture.
No, not really. The Word tells us what those days were like. I don't mix non-cannonized books of the Bible with the Bible. Enoch is definately another take on the times.
How so in your opinion?I'd say its a part of the Gnostic stuff thrown in to pervert scripture.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?